Jump to content

Please close leveraged positions on affected share markets by 29 March


BTG

Recommended Posts

I know some of this has already been posted on other threads but thought it would be useful to repost for those that have missed it or didn't receive an email from IG. Surely this kind of information should be visible on the IG website or in the blog posts. Really frustrating as a lot of these restricted securities are actually liquid ETFs, I've closed my affected positions (at a loss) to avoid the 100% margin change this Friday. Really disappointing that these changes are communicated at such short notice. Part of the appeal of the IG spread betting account for me is access to small caps which others don't offer. 

List of securities: https://www.ig.com/content/dam/publicsites/igcom/uk/210219_IGM_UK_Affected Markets - Non TT.pdf

From email: 

"We constantly review the products we offer in line with client demand. We have reviewed associated returns across our 12,000 leveraged share markets and decided to withdraw around 900 small-cap shares for spread betting and CFD accounts. These markets will continue to be available for share dealing – find out how to open a share dealing account below.

The list of affected shares that will be withdrawn from spread betting and CFD accounts are listed in this PDF. Please read on for details about the process, but in summary:
 

1. We are increasing margins so that all positions on these shares will have a margin requirement of 100% at 3pm on Friday 26 February
2. Please close positions by Monday 29 March 2021, from which point we will start to close any remaining open positions
3. You will still be able to buy the majority of shares outright using our share dealing service


What happens next?

For a small subset of the affected markets (listed as ‘set 1’ in the PDF), margin requirements are already at 100%. For the remaining markets (listed as ‘set 2’ in the PDF), margin requirements will increase to 100% from 3pm (UK time) on Friday 26 February.

You have until Monday 29 March 2021 to close your open positions on affected markets, from which point we will start to close any positions still open. Positions will be closed as soon as practical from this point, while ensuring that all reasonable steps are taken to obtain the best results for our clients. This action is taken in accordance with Term 28(3) of the latest version of the applicable customer agreement governing your account(s) with IG.

We encourage you to review your exposure and consider how best to manage your position(s). Should you wish to maintain your existing position(s) with IG in the short term, please ensure that you have enough money on your account(s) to cover the new margin requirements.

We understand that you may need time to decide what to do, or to seek alternative exposure. Nonetheless, we urge you to close your position(s) before Monday 29 March to ensure that you have discretion over the closure.

Can I invest in these markets via share dealing?

Yes, most of them will remain available via share dealing. While you won’t be able to transfer existing leveraged position(s) from a spread betting or CFD account to an IG share dealing account, you can use an IG share dealing account to buy the majority of affected shares outright."

  • Like 2
Link to comment

My previous comment was deleted or not approved by moderator for some strange reason, perhaps too critical.

Can someone please help me to understand the rationale/logic/etc here...

The only reasoning supplied is as such:

We constantly review the products we offer in line with client demand. We have reviewed associated returns across our 12,000 leveraged share markets and decided to withdraw around 900 small-cap shares for spread betting and CFD account

1. Client demand-- some of these stocks have been among the top traded shares recently including MercadoLibre and 6/10 of the HotCopper Top 10 most discussed stocks list. So perhaps its not client demand

2. Associated returns? Not sure what this means-- can anyone inform me. IG doesn't make enough money off them?

3. Small-cap shares-- These are not all small-cap shares and includes BYD (645 billion market cap)

 

 

 

Link to comment

I assume it is due to your second point on associated returns. Most of IG's revenue comes from OTC leveraged products (SB/CFD), the majority of this is from FX and indices and only a small proportion is on stocks. This is because there are a limited number of FX pairs and indices and therefore they can achieve 80-90% internalisation and provide tight spreads but still make good returns with low external hedging costs. Compare this to equities where they have a huge range of single name stocks available and therefore a much lower rate of internalisation requiring them to incur higher costs to hedge against the street. They can't maintain the same rate of profitability unless they increase spreads which puts off punters. Only IG know client demand but I presume the list of 900 securities have low turnover and high hedging costs although some of the ETFs surprise me. 

Also given what we have seen in the last month, broker margin requirements will have increased across the board and therefore it doesn't make financial sense to tie up capital which could be used elsewhere. Unfortunately I predict this reduction in less profitable sectors will continue as IG look to aggressively expand into other regions and primarily the US. I've reviewed other spread betting providers and no one comes close to offering the same range of UK and US stocks so I'll be sticking around for now. 

Link to comment

That list that was removed was basically everything I was trading.

It seems like they tied too much capital for "low" returns on their end.

They are using the pareto principle, concentrating on the 20% of products that make 80% of their money.

But for me, without those stocks I'm not going to be profitable. Which means I will just stop trading on IG.

I think I'm one of those who spend the most on fees on IG, for this year alone I spent more than 10K on fees.

The real issue here is retailers (us) we are buying tons of stocks and holding them for too long, which means the capital is blocked and they don't make fees.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Joo said:

That list that was removed was basically everything I was trading.

It seems like they tied too much capital for "low" returns on their end.

They are using the pareto principle, concentrating on the 20% of products that make 80% of their money.

But for me, without those stocks I'm not going to be profitable. Which means I will just stop trading on IG.

I think I'm one of those who spend the most on fees on IG, for this year alone I spent more than 10K on fees.

The real issue here is retailers (us) we are buying tons of stocks and holding them for too long, which means the capital is blocked and they don't make fees.

That's a hefty amount of fees to be paying, is that on a normal dealing account or spread bet/cfd? 

I don't think long holding periods would be an issue as brokers would normally just lend the stock back out. 

Link to comment
8 hours ago, BTG said:

That's a hefty amount of fees to be paying, is that on a normal dealing account or spread bet/cfd? 

I don't think long holding periods would be an issue as brokers would normally just lend the stock back out. 

CFD. But let's say you buy a stock with 10x leverage, IG has to buy that stock with 10 times more money than what you have. That money has to come from somewhere. If you hold for a long time they are just blocking money waiting for you to close the position. Retailers have started to hold positions for much longer periods of time now.

Link to comment
On 25/02/2021 at 19:08, Joo said:

CFD. But let's say you buy a stock with 10x leverage, IG has to buy that stock with 10 times more money than what you have. That money has to come from somewhere. If you hold for a long time they are just blocking money waiting for you to close the position. Retailers have started to hold positions for much longer periods of time now.

I would assume they also utilise margin and also have the ability to lend the stock back out again for a fee

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      16,577
    • Total Posts
      79,190
    • Total Members
      65,044
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    frumudana
    Joined 28/11/21 10:53
  • Posts

    • Wow, anonymous random person on the internet who has done his "own research" knows better than the medical and scientific community including the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Advisor.
    • The new variant seems to have a higher rate of transmission and a lower infection fatality rate than delta, this is the normal progression for a virus (spreads more easily but causes less harm). It has clearly been in circulation for some time but only now been sequenced. Already found in the UK, Europe and Australia. Even highly mutable viruses like flu should only come up with new dominant strains every couple of years or so but with covid it’s more like 6 months. This is a strong indication of vaccine ADE where the viral evolutionary process speeds up in response to a mass vaccination programme and is why the vaccinations should have been targeted to the vulnerable only. Reminder that the covid infection fatality rate is similar to flu, yes people do die of flu but we never locked down, switched off the health service and forced an experimental drug on everyone. Sweden did none of these things and had no more deaths in 2020 than normal. Vaccine ADE also causes the suppression and derangment of the natural immune system so in time people will become dependant on vaccine boosters and upgrades. At some point the high rate of mutations will throw up a variant that is more deadly not less. All previous trials for mRNA vaccines were halted due to vaccine ADE. They knew this might happen. The misleading info govt continues to put out is being highlighted more and more hence the panic over ‘conspiracy theories’ and anti-vaxxers. Be very sceptical of the official narrative and question the road the govt is leading you down because currently you are watching the destruction of western democracy and the Chinafication of the western world – yes really. Govts admit that the vaccines don’t prevent covid transmission. So why do govts insist on vax passports? There’s absolutely no justifiable, rational reason. The vax passports are part of a bigger picture than just covid. Many are obliged to get vaccinated just to stay in a job but start the critical thinking process anyway, it’s not too late.   But but but ... How did we ever manage to eradicate smallpox then ?????   1. A sterilizing vaccine 2. No animal reservoirs 3. Focused quarantine for positive cases 4. A public health establishment worthy of trust 5. International cooperation 6. Centuries of work Zero covid is a dangerous utopian fantasy. (Jay Bhattacharya @DrJBhattacharya) Eradication of Covid Is a Dangerous and Expensive Fantasy - WSJ
    • haha, Patrick Vallance - ‘the reason this one is worrying is the combination of transmissibility and the potential for some degree of escape from vaccines because of the changes.’ They haven’t even tested it against the vaccine but they know in advance the vaccines wouldn't work. Some degree of escape haha, total you mean, as said, only cooking the books allowed Delta to look like the vaccines still worked - a bit. Don't comply, stop swallowing this never ending stream of utter garbage.        
×
×
  • Create New...