Jump to content
  • 0

The one-to-many relationship EPICs have with instruments


Guest Benjamin

Question

Guest Benjamin

When I first began to use the IG REST API, I believed that EPICs were unique instrument identifiers: that a given EPIC would always correspond to a specific instrument and that this instrument would never change.

 

However, I have recently discovered that this is untrue. For example, there are 19 daily Japan 225 tunnels available, which always have a set of corresponding EPICs of the form BT.D.NIK._.IP, where _ can take a value from 1 to 19. However, the size of tunnel specified by any given EPIC changes. Last week, BT.D.NIK.1.IP was +/-120 points, at the time of posting this it is +/-160 points.

 

This causes issues and opens questions.

  1. Are all EPICs mutable in this way? If not, which are and which are not?
  2. If I would like to programatically pull historical data or open positions on a market such as the Japan 225 daily tunnels, how can I be sure of what I am doing - I wouldn't want to open a position on a 160 tunnel when I thought it was 120?
  3. For the Japan 225 daily tunnels, there are historical prices going back to 2012-05-28; do these data correspond to the price for the EPIC (i.e. a whole bunch of different tunnel sizes), or the price for the given tunnel size, i.e. always 120? If the latter is true, it would be exceedingly useful to be able to pull data for all tunnel sizes that you store, rather than only the ones offered at the present time; however, if this is the case, are you computing prices for tunnels not currently offered, or are days simply missing for this? If they are computed, are these prices likely to be different to live prices (i.e. are live prices affected by demand in a way that unavailable prices are not?). Is what is true for the Japan 225 daily tunnels also true for other markets with one-to-many EPIC-instrument relationships?
  4. What is behind IG's decision to switch to different tunnel sizes in this case, and in others? - the Wall St and FTSE daily tunnels do not appear to switch (have they ever?).
  5. How can I know when switches have occurred?
  6. What else should I be aware of on this issue?

I need to make sure that I am analysing the correct data and opening the correct positions.

Link to comment

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

 

You're correct in that we do reuse some EPICs over the each trading day. For the most part each EPIC will be stable over the trading day so, for instance, if the FTSE ladder 1 is to be above 6500 when it comes on, it will be that all day.  It almost certainly won’t be that day to day and will refer to a different strike price. The only difference is with touches and tunnels. This is because as soon as a binary touch/tunnel is triggered it becomes untradeable which gives us the option to reuse the EPIC for another touch. For instance if FTSE touch 1 is to touch 6500 and at midday this happens, the touch would go offline and we would reuse to the EPIC  to put on a 6550 touch. So from a historical data point of view it’s not very useful information because for half of the day the EPIC will be referring to the 6500 strike and for the other half the 6550 strike.

 

So in relation to your questions, our Binary desk have provided the following:

 

  1. All EPICs will change on a day to day basis and in some cases when a strike has been hit for touches and tunnels they may change intraday.
  2. It's not possible to pull data for a specific tunnel size, as the EPIC for a specific tunnel may be different one day to the next. 
  3. Historical prices will be for each EPIC not each tunnel size and you're correct in thinking there will be days when certain tunnel sizes are not priced, since we only have a limited number of EPICs so use them for relevant tunnel sizes.
  4. We switch different tunnel sizes. If the Nikkei were to be about to open up down 500 points there is no point offering any tunnel before say +/-520 points so that is where we will start. Conversely if the Nikkei were to be in a low vol period and about to open up unchanged we would not feel it worthwhile offering the +-520 tunnel. The FTSE and DOW tunnels will almost certainly have changed at some point in the time frame you mention, but they change less often as the Nikkei often has bigger moves.

I hope that helps!

 

Dan

Link to comment
Guest Benjamin

Thanks for the info , this makes sense. I have a couple of follow up questions.

 

When making trades via the API, I would like to be sure of precicely what is being traded. Is the preferred/only way to check what a specific EPIC corresponds to, to check its name (e.g. "Daily N225 Cash to keep in range -460 to +460")?

 

If they did, do you happen to know when the DJIA and FTSE tunnels changed in the past, and if possible what these changes were? It would be really useful to be able to query what any given historical data point corresponded to specifically.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Guest DanC

Hey Benjamin,

 

Apologies for the delayed response on this. Our developers have confirmed that instrumentName is the only way to check what a specific epic refers to. Unfortunately we don't keep a record of the changes to the tunnels, nor is there anyway to pull this via the API, but our developers have taken note too see if they can make it easier to consume this data via the API.

 

Hope that helps,
Dan

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Recently, U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty from Tennessee spoke at the Bitcoin conference, stating his efforts to push for Bitcoin-supportive legislation to promote freedom and opportunity. This year, cryptocurrency has become a key battleground in the election campaigns. It remains to be seen whether future policies on cryptocurrency will improve.
    • The digital landscape is undergoing a profound transformation as attention, once a freely given commodity, is increasingly recognized as a valuable asset. Layer3 is at the forefront of this revolution, pioneering a new economy where attention can be owned, traded, and monetized   This innovative approach empowers individuals to monetize their engagement, providing unprecedented control over personal data. Simultaneously, advertisers benefit from transparent metrics that optimize campaign performance. Content creators are presented with diverse revenue avenues beyond traditional advertising, while the overall ecosystem experiences a more equitable distribution of value.   The implications of Layer3 extend across various sectors. Social media platforms, for instance, can leverage this technology to revolutionize user engagement and monetization strategies. Tokenomics play a crucial role in driving Layer3's economy, incentivizing participation and rewarding value creation. While challenges such as data privacy and market volatility exist, the potential benefits of Layer3 are immense   Anticipation is building as its native token $L3 is on Bitget Pre-market as users await its listing on the exchange. This milestone is expected to significantly increase the token's visibility and accessibility, potentially driving substantial growth and attracting new investors. As the countdown begins, the crypto community watches with keen interest, eager to see how Layer3 will perform in this new chapter.
    • I've been exploring the world of play-to-earn gaming recently, looking for something that's not just about endless grinding but actually offers a fun and rewarding experience. OGC really stood out to me because it combines gaming with a sense of community in a unique way. OGC isn't just a game; it's a platform where you can play, earn, and even help shape its future. You're not just a player; you're part of a community with a voice. The idea of earning crypto while playing games is exciting, but what makes OGC special is its focus on community involvement. Your feedback can directly influence the development of the game, which is a big deal. I've also heard that the OGC token is available for pre-market trading on Bitget. While I'm still getting to know the platform and its features, it's definitely something to keep an eye on. Has anyone else tried OGC? What has your experience been like? I'd love to hear your thoughts and any tips you might have.
×
×
  • Create New...
us