Jump to content

Cost efficient S&P ETFs? - London Exchange vs US Exchange


Recommended Posts

I am trying to work out what is the most cost effective method of investing in an S&P 500 ETF.  I am not factoring in the actual trade fees (£3 for UK shares and £10 for US) .

All thoughts are appreciated.

I know that the standard VOO , IVV,  and SPY which are traded on the NYSE also have LSE equivalents, VUSA, IUSA, and SPY5 respectively. Im based in London, UK.

 

Is option A or option B more cost effective?

Option A: Purchase VOO, IVV,  or SPY  on the NYSE. I assume I would then incur a currency exchange fee 0.5%, plus be taxed on quarterly dividends. Those returns would effectively incur more FX fee's if I was to reinvest them into the ETF.

Option B: Purchase VUSA, IUSA, or SPY5 on LSE. I read on their respective websites that they are Ireland domiciled but on the LSE, will I be charged an irish stamp duty of 1% or UK stamp duty of 0.5%? I assume this will be my only cost, as the 'management fee' takes into account everything on the ETF side.

 

Are there other differentiating costs that I need to consider?

 

Liquidity:  For ticker VUSA, Market data on IG says that less than 10 people have positions open for this stock. Do I only have access to trade with other IG people, therefore making this stock illiquid, or does IG pair my order with everyone on the stock exchange looking to sell?

 

Finally, is there any glaringly obvious reasons I should chose one provider over the other? I can see that ishares seem to be most popular on IG, and that the mgmt fees are similar (0.07% - 0.09%).

Thanks in advance

 

Edited by BNoble
Spelling
Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      20,022
    • Total Posts
      88,028
    • Total Members
      69,015
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Zeltuan
    Joined 28/09/22 08:19
  • Posts

    • Markets are still firmly seated in a ‘risk aversion’ trajectory, but the progress for that slide has ebbed – perhaps owing to the absence of a dominant fundamental event risk in the foreground. Meanwhile, the pressure from inflation, recession risks and the Dollar’s extreme pressure are unrelenting.        
    • Hi Anda, Thanks for the response. Could I ask you to clarify a few points please so that my understanding is correct: 1) when you say the ETF is not ISA eligible - do you mean specifically the ETFs that I mentioned (IDTG and ZROZ) or do you mean all US Government bond ETFs are not ISA eligible? 2) are you able to share any ETFs linked to US Government bonds that are ISA eligible or point me towards where I can find this out? 3) could you expand a little on what you mean by "we only offer US ETFs to professional traders at this point". What do you mean by US ETFs? Do you mean any/all ETFs specifically linked to US Government bonds (even if they are traded on the FTSE) or does this just include US Government bond ETFs traded in the US, or all US ETFs in general (including those not linked to Gov bonds)? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...