Jump to content

Staying Bearish on Stocks: Top Trading Opportunities


Recommended Posts

Jul 4, 2022 | DailyFX
James Stanley, Senior Strategist

Staying Bearish on Stocks: Top Trading Opportunities

It’s been a rough year for stocks but I don’t think that the low is in just yet. Maybe something along those lines happens in Q3, some type of bottoming effect, but I’m not anticipating as such from where we’re at now.

The Fed has shifted and at this point, that seems fairly obvious. What makes me retain a bearish approach towards equities is how there’s still so much ‘buy the dip’ mentality showing around global markets. And while the Fed has already made some inroads towards tighter policy, we still have yet to see any significant response with inflation which means the Fed is going to have to keep hiking until something begins to shift. And at this point there simply is a lack of evidence suggesting that this may be near and, if anything, there’s evidence pointing in the other direction with impact still set to show from the lockdown in China and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

The effects of higher rates are also likely to bring a larger toll on emerging markets, which could, in turn, bring additional impact to US equities that like to sell products and derive revenue from these economies. Combine that with an expected pinch in Europe as inflation scales higher and there’s not a lot of optimism on the horizon for equities and at this point stocks are still quite overvalued compared to historical norms.

I’m going to retain my bearish stance on US equities into Q3, specifically looking at the Nasdaq and S&P 500. But, even the Dow brings some bearish potential into Q3 as prices have, so far, tested but not broken below, a critical set of supports straddling the 30k psychological level.

DOW JONES

There’s a major spot of support on the Dow Jones chart running from a Fibonacci level at 29671 up to another Fibonacci level at 30,109. In between those two, we have the 30k psychological level so this is a big batch of support on the Dow Jones chart.

And, just as it did in early 2021, this spot has so far helped to cauterize the lows as bulls have provoked a bounce. This has so far led to a mild bounce and that bounce may continue for a little while but, there’s resistance overhead at 31,393 and then another confluent zone around 32,500 that could prove as problematic for bears.

I think the support zone around 30k could give way in Q3. The next confluent support zone on my chart is around 27,459, which is a little over 10% away from current price, as of this writing.

DOW JONES WEEKLY CHART (2018-PRESENT)

Staying Bearish on Stocks: Top Trading Opportunities

Chart created with TradingView, prepared by James Stanley

S&P 500

For my Q2 top trade, one of the big sticking points in the S&P 500 was a confluent zone of support that was previously tested in Q1 but, by the end of the quarter, hadn’t yet given way. This confluent zone was between two Fibonacci levels at 4186 and 4211. It finally gave way in April before showing up as a resistance test in late May.

There was another confluent zone between two Fibonacci levels a little bit lower that ran from 3802-3830. This zone came in as support in mid-May and was broken-through in early-June. As of this writing, it’s coming back in as resistance.

At this point, the trend seems fairly clear and lower prices seem likely. The bigger question is timing as I’m writing this with a little more than a week before the end of Q2. But, this bounce may run for a little while longer as there’s still some open gap running above the 3900 level.

For Q3, I want to look for price to move down towards 3500, which is around the 50% mark of the pandemic move. This would be a loss of approximately 7.5% from current price and given the backdrop, it seems a reasonable support target. There is another more important zone, however, and that’s down around 3200. There are two Fibonacci levels straddling that price and that’s about -14.3% away. It would be a bit aggressive for a move in a single quarter but I’m not going to rule it out – instead, I’ll merely mark that as a support target that I think can come into play by the end of the year.

S&P 500 WEEKLY PRICE CHART (2018 – PRESENT)

Staying Bearish on Stocks: Top Trading Opportunities

Chart created with TradingView, prepared by James Stanley

NASDAQ

The Nasdaq continues to show a more developed bearish trend and I think this will remain the case through Q3. While the S&P 500 is currently finding resistance at the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement of the pandemic move, the Nasdaq is finding resistance at the 50% mark of its own move around that same period of time. And while the S&P 500 has drawn down by as much as 24.32%, the Nasdaq has given up as much as 34% from the high set last November.

And this makes sense: With rates moving higher, the riskier tech-heavy index has become more vulnerable. And as rates continue to jump funding to companies will become more difficult and this is something that can continue to negatively impact higher-beta issues that populate the Nasdaq.

The next spot of support on my longer-term Nasdaq chart rests in the zone from 10,500-10,750, the former of which is the 61.8% retracement of the pandemic move. That’s a little under 10% from current prices and seems a reasonable support target for Q3. Should the move continue to develop, which given the drivers, it can, then a 10k print can’t be ruled out from the equation.

NASDAQ 100 WEEKLY CHART (JUNE 2018 – PRESENT)

Staying Bearish on Stocks: Top Trading Opportunities

Chart created with TradingView, prepared by James Stanley

 

DailyFX and IG.jpg

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      19,501
    • Total Posts
      86,847
    • Total Members
      68,750
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Stevie-U
    Joined 09/08/22 15:09
  • Posts

    • It is still a wonder to me that Central banks do NOT get it, and perhaps industry. Yes, wage increase pressures are present. That SHOULD BE EXPECTED. Yes, companies have reasons to increase their prices. That too IS EXPECTERD. WHY? PRIMARY FACT: Central Banks have FAILED TO CONTROL INFLATION. THERE IS NO GETTING AROUND IT WITH JUSTIFICATIONS. Taking up various "toxic debts" of banks and companies does not solve excess money printing (now called QE). This only transfer's somebody else's debts onto the government side with no exchange in return, and then getting general bond holders to pay part of it by charging negative interest rates. The culprits who CAUSED THE TOXIC DEBITS go scotch free and it encourages them to maintain such bad practices. It is ODD no central banker thinks of things like this that is SO important. So remind me, what are they professional in? Governments are supposed to take care of the general population's financial welfare, not private industries. Handle the excess money printing, you handle the inflation. Interest rates having to shoot up is a sign of past mishandlings, e.g., using ultra low interest rates ever so long incorrectly. It IS because of this that purchasing power of the currency is lost. It is BECAUSE OF THIS that individual wages and price increases need to take place, rightly, to keep up with the increase of the cost of living. Yet governments and central banks worry about wage increases and price increases as a menace. And they try to limit wage increase. Price increases occur but then their customers cut-back on spending as they cannot afford as much. This IS AN INVERSION in thinking by officials. It develops a vicious circle. The primary source of the problem is out of mind, yet it has been so well known for decades. SIMPLE BASICS ARE NEGLECTED, OR JUST MISUNDERSTOOD. THIS APPLIES TO ALL CENTRAL BANKS, who seem to be copying each other in actions. Mervyn King, ex-UK central bank chief seems to be the only one who has some understanding on the problems of central bankers. It is understandable the the BoE wishes not to head into recession or reduce significantly the GDP by attempting to control interest rate increase. But that is misguided in my opinion. WHY? Rates level manage the Macro-economics, loans, savings and mortgages level control. It is the individual company's operating condition that is neglected. Each company may be responsible for it but they (some) can act poorly, cut corners, use creative accounting, unethical practices, no cash flow, huge debts, not growing organically, non-profitable, taking too huge a risk, etc... IT IS THIS AT THE MICRO-ECONOMIC LEVEL THAT THE HEALTH OF BUSINESSES ARE NOT GUIDED. When a plane is in operation, takes off and fly's it is in good hands, with good control. When "things" go wrong and the plane is out of control we have bad control (for whatever the reason). Similarly the ECONOMY IS IN BAD CONTROL . Governments and bankers think Marco economics will "solve" everything  --  it comes out in the way they operate. Letting companies borrow until they have the highest debts ever in history is just one sign of 'bad control'. No banker would over loan a household individual more than he / she can pay back. And oh, they are always made to be paid back. Individual companies can over burden themselves with huge debts yet continue as nothing is wrong, no alarms, no worries. That is, until some economic trigger brings it down and cause an expected domino-effect. But bankers are clever there are government subsides, tax-relief, and transfer toxic debts relief plans in existence, then "all should be well"!!!! REALLY? HISTORY TEACHES US DIFFERENTLY. WHAT IS WRONG? For one, you make the taxpayer pay for others loans, costs, expanses, etc... call it what you will. So industry does not pay its own way as a private industry.  Industry then goes back to the same old bad practices. Then, later, they wonder why the average GDP now is not as good as prior to previous recession!!!!! HEY, HAVE YOU NOT REALISED THAT YOU CHOCKED OFF THE BASIC FOUNDATION THAT INVESTING IS BASED ON.   -----   SAVERS AND INVESTORS. The thinking is something like this: No, we  have to have these existing plans. WE GOT TO KEEP SAVERS SPENDING, SPENDING SPENDING ANY WHICH WAY WE CAN FORCE THEM. WHY, IT IS THE DEBTS WE BUILD-UP  -- IT IS TOO MUCH AND HAVE TO PAY THEM OFF SOMEHOW -  WE GOT TO MAKE THEM PAY....... AND GROW THE ECONOMY OUT OF THIS MESS. BESIDES BANKERS WANT THEIR LOANS PAID, AFTER THEY COLLECTED HUGE INTEREST PAYMENTS OVER A LONG PERIOD, AND SO ADVICE GOVERNMENT HOW TO "SOLVE IT". After all these years we are no better off. And all end up suffering. The western countries, at least, are living beyond their means. THIS IS THE DWINDLING SPIRAL. IT HAPPENS OVERS DECADES.  
    • Hi All, Thanks for your posts.  IG will be booking preference shares on a 1 for 1 basis. Thank you - Arvin
    • Still no response by email or on here, can't get through to anyone on the phone. I would say poor communication from IG, but its literally non existent.
×
×
  • Create New...