Jump to content
  • 0

API 403 Error


protagarusra

Question

Hi guys

I can't quite understand why, when I access the API via my local host it works fine, but when I access it via my hosting provider, I get the following. Any idea?

HTTP error: 403 <HTML><HEAD> <TITLE>Access Denied</TITLE> </HEAD><BODY> <H1>Access Denied</H1> You don't have permission to access "http&#58;&#47;&#47;api&#46;ig&#46;com&#47;gateway&#47;deal&#47;session" on this server.<P> Reference&#32;&#35;18&#46;c56bdc17&#46;1668005887&#46;2224a662 </BODY> </HTML>

  • Like 2
Link to comment

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hi protagarusra,

I am getting the same error. Did you get anything resolved here?

For my Live account, I can login using the API Companion but not through my code. The API companion works with Demo and importantly my code also works in Demo. To try to access Live, within my code, I change the URL, username and password (using those values that work correctly in the API Companion), so really can't see why it isn't working.

Anyone any ideas?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0

Hi guys, 

I've got exactly the same issue, everythings fine when I run in Demo mode. But when I try to run the code in Live (changing the URL, username, pswd and token of course) I get the same error

<HTML><HEAD>\n<TITLE>Access Denied</TITLE>\n</HEAD><BODY>\n<H1>Access Denied</H1>\n \nYou don't have permission to access \"http&#58;&#47;&#47;api&#46;ig&#46;com&#47;gateway&#47;deal&#47;session\" on this server.<P>\nReference\n</BODY>\n</HTML>\n
 
I've had the IG support team on the phone two times now (+ a few emails documenting) and no solution yet... 
 
Using the api companion no problem I can switch between prod and demo without a glitch. Same using Postman (local or cloud) I get no problem authentificating... your problem been solved yet ?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0

Been in touch with support by email but it's a long wait to hear anything back. Over a week ago they passed it on to a developer to look at but I haven't heard anything back yet.
My error message looks to be similar (and likely the same) as yours.
I can login in to live from various sources but not the one I actually need to use. That source works for Demo.
If I use incorrect credentials, I get the same "Access Denied" so it looks to me like it is being blocked from IG's side (but only specific sources/domains/IP addresses).

Link to comment
  • 0

I've pretty much only been using https. IIRC, I tested http a few months back without any noticeable difference.

I updated this thread to point out that something has most likely changed at IG's side to allow this to work. My code is unchanged for several months and I only retested when I was looking at something else and was expecting this to give the same error as before.

Connecting to Demo in the same way worked last December and is still working now. Connecting to Live has worked from other applications; it just wasn't working from where I needed it to.

As it now seems to be working, if I decide to move my code over I have options and a backup strategy already built if this happens in the future.  I just worry that IG may make changes in the future and that the APIs stop working with support not really being interested in resolving the matter. Of course my support call may have initiated some change or bug-fix that I'm not been updated on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 0

Thanks for the news TwoStepsForwardOneStepBack, 

I've re-tested on my side, still the same issue (the error message has changed though). And bug-or-feature, of course I'm using https:// 

IG support has stopped answering emails, maybe I've run out of some kind of support quota... 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • ARTFI's mission to make high-value art accessible through fractional ownership and NFTs is a fascinating concept. Let's explore other projects breaking down barriers in the art world and bringing ownership to the masses. ARTFI offers some unique features beyond just fractionalization: Focus on Blue-Chip Art, their concentration on established artists attracts high-net-worth collectors and increases investment potential. Industry Endorsements, supports from prominent figures adds credibility to the platform. So, is ARTFI your one-stop shop for owning a piece of an iconic painting because they are listed on Bitget? Maybe or maybe not. There are other options, and the art market itself is evolving alongside NFTs. What do you think? Is ARTFI a revolutionary force in art ownership, or just a trendy gimmick? Have you explored any other fractional ownership or art-related NFT projects? Share your thoughts in the comments!
    • Mystiko Network like competitors like Omni are promoting interoperability and scalability in the crypto landscape. However, Mystiko is standing out with seamless compatibility with various L1 and L2 blockchains which they have extended to cross-chain bridges, wallets, DEXs, and other dApps. By eliminating blockchain barriers, Mystiko Network allows users to transfer assets and interact with various dApps more easily. This focus on interoperability goes hand-in-hand with scalability. Plus, their ZK SDK allows developers to build secure and private dApps while reducing costs and simplifying cross-chain transactions. It has successfully raised $29.25 million and have forge backing from industry giants like Samsung Next, Coinlist, Hashkey Capital etc... emphasizes it potential and gives it a firm foothold in the interoperability niche. Mystiko is about to hit another milestone as their token XZK is about to be listed on a Tier1 CEX like Bitget further exposing it to investors! Overall, they are ticking the right boxes and I believe they are a project to watch!
×
×
  • Create New...
us