Jump to content

IG Tool Bar issues - can anyone help me understand this?


Guest bjb007

Recommended Posts

Screen Shot 2017-11-08 at 11.07.00.png

I am new to IG and have just received the invite to enter the competition to post on here and I guess I am shooting myself in the foot for posting something negative but this is something I really do not understand can exist.  

 

In short in the UK we pay Stamp Duty and this adds to our purchase price (0.5%) along with the commission we pay IG.   However, for some reason IG do not include this value in the Book Cost.   Consequently the Profit/Loss on your open position does not take these costs into account and so when looking at your Open Position it shows a better P/L position than actually exists?    

 

When I brought this up I was informed I could edit the Book Cost to include all my costs?   This is is not automation as I know it and really annoying.   On my current position with one stock I have have bought 3 times at different prices and each time I have had to re-calculate the book price in order to get the Profit and Loss calculation to work.

 

Please can anyone out there provide me with a solution to this nightmare?   

 

Thanks

Link to comment

Hi,

 

Welcome to IG community. We take the number of shares x the executed price. This is designed to show the real P/L based on the buy and sell price to avoid any potential confusion. The commission and stamp duty are shown on the trading ledger. We are more than happy to take your feedback and pass it on to the relevant team.

 

Thanks,

Claire

Link to comment

How can that be the real profit and loss when you have not taken into account the full cost of the transaction?   You actually have to still calculate if you are actually making any money.    You are saying you have to go to the trading ledger, add up all the values for multiple transactions and then take a look at what the potential sale figure will be to work out your gain?   I am only here because Barclays completely self imploded and now have a system which can not give me an indication of how well I am doing because apparently people only want to know a figure which only gives part of the picture?   I should add that when I joined up I did report this and was told it would be fixed within 2 weeks.   That didn't happen.   Am I the only person here?????   LOL.   Makes me laugh, a sad laugh.....

Link to comment

Hi  

 

I can certainly understand your point of view, however I believe the current platforms layout and logic makes sense. Although factors such as tax and commissions are important to remember when looking at net profits/loses, the layout of the platform supports how we currently have it set up. Let me try and explain the reasoning. 

 

The platform shows the number of shares you've purchased and the direct market average price which you have received. Shares x Average Price therefore = Book Cost. If this book cost figure automatically took into account commissions etc then it wouldn't follow on from the number of shares and average price. Further more it would only include opening commission and taxes and omit any potential closing costs.

 

It would be far more complicated to have book cost = number of shares x average price - commission and taxes on the opening trade, but omit the closing trade costs. 

 

For this reason we quote the book cost as the book cost of the actual asset, and then allow you to take into account the commissions and taxes yourself. You can then edit this forward looking and speculative to take into account potential costs of the closing trade for a true reflection of the net profit / loss of the deal. 

 

I hope that clarifies our reasoning. 

 

EDIT: also don't feel like expressing your own opinion or asking a question would be seen as a negative on IG Community. The whole goal and aim of our forum is to provide an open and transparent area for clients to discuss trade idea, ask questions and submit feedback. All the best. :) 

Link to comment
  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      23,626
    • Total Posts
      97,021
    • Total Members
      44,188
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    caryeetey
    Joined 05/12/23 18:46
  • Posts

    • Every investors top priority in choosing a crypto exchange is security of their assets. Over the years, many exchanges have come and gone due to varying factors. Some packed up as a result of mismanagement of users funds, others were due to security breaches like hacks and some due to harsh bear market condition but in the midst of this, Bitget continue to shine, soar and expand across board with the latest report seeing the exchange protection fund record a new ATH of over $400M in the month of November. No doubt the month of November was quite good for crypto however Bitget protection fund was around $330M four months ago. Very drastic addition in my opinion, while some exchanges seems to be having different issues like lawsuit, hacks and some even packing up due to bankruptcy, it still beat my imagination what Bitget is doing differently to achieve such significant milestone. What are your thoughts about this development?
    • Considering the impact of Lisk LSK to Defi and web3 and the simplicity it provides for developers to transfer skills more rapidly for the building of dApps. Am confident that the token will highly be sought after. I have deposited some of my LSK on Bitget to share from the Airdrop event to celebrate the listing of the token on the CEX.
    • Thanks for sharing @THT I highly doubt that gold will fall below the 1900 level, which is the lowest support level on the monthly time frame. Right now, the current pullback in gold is nothing but a FALSE MOVE to the downside which ALWAYS takes place before a REAL BREAKOUT. This FALSE MOVE can last no longer than 1-3 time units and is simply the REQUIRED movement of markets. Gold is setting up for a major sling-shot to the upside.
×
×
  • Create New...
us