Jump to content

Debenhams / Mike Ashley


Guest Debbers

Recommended Posts

Guest Debbers

It seems likely to me that what will actually happen here is that Mike Ashley will bid, because aside from anything else, the House of Fraser is not of critical size without combining with Debenhams and is losing money heavily.  As Mr Ashley does not have access to enough luxury brands, so he is having to fill the House of Fraser stores with Sports Direct stock which is badly weakening the House of Fraser brand. He needs to combine Debenhams with the House of Fraser fairly urgently I would say, especially now that Debenhams has signed off the Li + Fung deal which promises a pipeline of decent quality items into its stores.

Equally, I believe he will use a mixture of Sports Direct shares and cash to make such a bid, this being far cheaper for him than using just his own cash or the supposed £1billion warchest he has accrued. It will also allow him to unify the purchase behind one corporate entity and use any tax advantages to the full.

It seems to me that this possibility is being ignored by many writers, yet it seems very likely. The issue of the £220m bondholders is to a degree a red herring in this. It is akin to the entry price to being involved in this bid, as the bond holders have to be paid back in full if he makes a bid, equally if an administration event happens, the bondholders are the first to become indemnified and will simply swap their £220m for equity in the new entity via the administrator. That means the bondholders have to be bought out automatically as a part of the cost of buying Debenhams. Why should Mike Ashely want then to allow Debenhams to go into administration? He would totally lose his equity stake and have to bid for the parts of the group he wants from the administrator in a queue with any other bidders, without preference. That may then be more costly to him that just paying the equity cost now of a bid – say £150m plus the bonds = £370m = bargain price. The banking facility can then be renegotiated afterwards or combined with Sports Directs facility, probably with the same banks, but at a fraction of the cost!

So then it is down to the cost of the equity – a takeover at these share price levels would be very cheap – probably around £100m – 150m plus £220m for the bonds, and plus say another £100m to stabilise Debenhams would mean that the total purchase would cost less than half Mike Ashley’s £1bn warchest. I’d say that would be a bargain for him for such an asset.

Link to comment

It is clear Ashley wants Debenhams and it would illogical not to merge it with House of Fraser. While the Li & Fung deal will help supply luxury brands, Ashley's interest far precedes that deal and he does have other channels. Flannels, its 'luxury' outlet, is performing better than its core business. 

I don't rule out a bid and I agree a cash-and-share offer would offer benefits, including the ability to unify the businesses. But Ashley has waited for firms to fall into administration before and has said he would seek to buy Debenhams if it did collapse, even if it wasn't the "desired outcome". Read the FT article here (https://www.ft.com/content/0f985558-4836-11e9-bbc9-6917dce3dc62

I'd also reiterate that, as cheap as Debenhams is, some rightly question its long-term attractiveness. It relies on leasing property rather than owning it and operates a model that is struggling to keep up with the digital age. While the bondholders may be regarded as a 'red herring', don't forget one crucial advantage of letting Debenhams fail is the ability to renegotiate property leases and other key terms. If he bids, landlords and others are not obligated to negotiate in the same way they would under a CVA etc... 

Link to comment
Guest Debbers

Fair points Josh, but why would Mike Ashley let Debenhams go into administration? His 30% shareholding would become worthless and it cost £120m! That's a lot of money to recover. I do not think he'd be the only one looking to buy the company from the administrators either. There would be a queue, probably including Amazon [the stores would all make decent depots / large showcase shops], Li and Fung [they would surely want to protect this new co-operation and potential sales source] and so on. Even Philip Green could become involved. 

I look at the £120m Mr Ashley has spent so far, and it dawns on me, that if a pre-pack situation arose, he would be a real loser - the debt would be coverted into equity by the administrators as the bondholders would be at the top of the queue in such a situation. Those bondholders / banks would no doubt value Debenhams much higher than it is currently [as they are now doing with Interserve] meaning anyone wanting to buy them would have to pay through the nose. The cost could easily exceed the low amount you would have to bid currently in the open market for them. What's the point of that? Since Mr Ashley has already spent £120m, and needs to buy the bonds for a takeover, which in turn costs a further £220m, he might as well spend the further £120m for a formal bid and take over Debenhams via a conventional takeover bid. Any bid via the administrators following a prepack will probably cost him north of £200m and he can use Sports Direct shares in a takeover to cut the cost.

 

Link to comment
Guest Debbers

Of course the other reason why Mike Ashley is so interested is that he is trying to move upmarket. His son has also been pushing the business in this direction and the Flannels part is seen as a future leader within the current Sports Direct model. The problem is that the House of Fraser purchase has in hindsight been problematic and loss making. It is clearly not a critical size, and is probably unstable financially meaning it is taking up a lot of valuable management time and money. It urgently needs to be combined with a larger entity to give it critical mass. Debenhams does that, and it is waiting to be bought at this price. 

Once it concludes its replacement £150m banking facility with the lenders, and then declines Mr Ashley's loan offer, I imagine he will have to bid. Otherwise, House of Fraser will become more unstable, more loss making, and more of a pointless investment. 

Another key reason for buying Debenhams is also to gain access to its digital offer. Whilst only 20% of its sales are through the internet, that is on a par with the best in the sector such as Next, and the House of Fraser badly needs to compete or become part of that offer. This is a growing side of Debenhams.

Lastly, I take on board completely your comments about CVA's but you must admit the current Debenhams board are unusually relaxed about this issue. I do wonder if deals have already been done behind the scenes as no shopping mall will want to lose such anchor tenants as Debenhams?

Link to comment
Guest Mike Ashley to join

Well, now the Board are agreeing to let Mike Ashley come in and take over for a £150m loan, I guess we can expect a formal takeover from him shortly after that EGM as he will want to exert maximum control on the business. 

At least it will mean that staff's jobs should now be safer, I believe Mr Ashley will invest in the business and now will be able to move ahead with merging the House of Fraser with Debenhams. The back office synergies and deals with landlords should be sizeable.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Apple’s recent stock weakness marks a divergence with other members of the Magnificent 7 and the broader Nasdaq 100. Source: Bloomberg   Indices Shares Apple Inc. Artificial intelligence Price iPhone Written by: Chris Beauchamp | Chief Market Analyst, London   Publication date: Friday 01 March 2024 13:26 AI Efforts in Question Apple's stock fell below $180 on Thursday for the first time since early-November, underperforming the broader market. While the S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq indices posted solid gains, Apple shares slipped around 1%. Source: Google Finance The decline comes as doubts loom about Apple's artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives. Rivals like Microsoft are delivering strong earnings growth tied to burgeoning AI technology. This was highlighted by Tuesday's report that Apple is discontinuing its decade-long electric vehicle project. Back in 2017, Apple CEO Tim Cook called the autonomous car endeavour the "mother of all AI projects." Stock Underperforms Broader Market So far in 2024, Apple shares have dropped 3%, trailing the S&P 500's 7% gain and the Nasdaq's 9% climb. Despite its long-term market-beating returns, Apple has recently lagged the S&P 500 on 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year timeframes, according to FactSet data. After spending most of 2021 to 2023 as the world's most valuable public company by market capitalization, Apple surrendered that crown to Microsoft in January. Microsoft's sales and profit growth have far outpaced Apple's, which posted negative growth in its 2022 fiscal year ending last September. AI Investment Hints but Details Lacking At Wednesday's shareholder meeting, Cook suggested Apple is "investing significantly" in generative AI. He said more specifics will be announced later this year. UBS analyst David Vogt predicts Apple's first major AI launch will come in June at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference. iPhone Sales Weakness Looms In addition to AI uncertainties, expectations for weak iPhone sales growth continue to weigh on Apple. iPhones accounted for 58% of Apple's total revenue last quarter. Some See Positives in Car Project Halt Some analysts see a silver lining in the halt of Apple's electric car plans. It enables the company to refocus AI talent on nearer-term products with greater market potential. To Morgan Stanley, it also shows Apple's "cost discipline." Apple analyst rating LSEG (formerly known as Refinitiv) data shows a consensus analyst rating of ‘buy’ for Apple with 10 strong buy, 17 buy, 13 hold and 2 sell – and a mean of estimates suggesting a long-term price target of $201.41 for the share, roughly 16% higher than the current price (as of 1 March 2024). Source: LSEG Technical outlook on the Apple share price The Apple share price continues to precariously weigh on its $180.30 to $179.25 support zone which consists of the January-to-February lows. A fall through and daily chart close below this area looks increasingly likely and would lead to levels being reached which were last traded in early-November with the 3 November low at $176.65 representing the first downside target. Apple Daily Candlestick Chart Source: TradingView Further down sits the $174.49 August low below which key support can be spotted between the September and October lows at $167.62 to $165.67. Were the $180.30 to $179.25 support zone to hold, though, a rise and daily chart close above last week’s high at $185.04 would need to occur, for a recovery off the support area to gain traction. In this scenario the Apple share price would trade back above its 200-day simple moving average (SMA) at $183.90 and target the 55-day SMA at $188.50. This will continue to favour a fall through support at $179.25 to take place as long as the Apple share price continues to trade below last week’s high at $185.04.     This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
    • PG Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge Daily Chart, 1 March 24 The Procter & Gamble Company, (PG) Daily Chart PG Elliott Wave Technical Analysis FUNCTION: Trend MODE: Impulse STRUCTURE: Motive POSITION: Minuette wave (ii) of {iii}. DIRECTION: Bottom in wave (ii).   DETAILS: As we are approaching ATH at 165$, we are expecting either an acceleration higher into wave (3) or else we could have topped in wave (C) to then fall back lower and continue the major correction.         PG Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge 4Hr Chart, 1 March 24 The Procter & Gamble Company, (PG) 4Hr Chart PG Elliott Wave Technical Analysis FUNCTION: Counter Trend MODE: Corrective STRUCTURE: Zigzag   POSITION: Wave a of (ii).   DIRECTION: Downside into wave (ii). DETAILS: Looking for a clear three wave move into wave (ii) to finding support around the 155$ mark.   Welcome to our PG Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge, your ultimate destination for detailed insights into The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) using Elliott Wave Technical Analysis. As of the Daily Chart on 1 March 24, we dive into crucial trends shaping the market.         *PG Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – Daily Chart* In terms of wave dynamics, we identify a trend function with an impulse structure, specifically a motive pattern. The current position is in Minuette wave (ii) of {iii}, indicating a potential bottom in wave (ii). With the approaching all-time high (ATH) at $165, we anticipate either an upward acceleration into wave (3) or a potential top in wave (C), followed by a downward movement to continue the major correction. *PG Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 4Hr Chart* Here, we explore a counter trend mode with a corrective structure, specifically a zigzag pattern. The present position is in Wave a of (ii), suggesting downside movement into wave (ii). We anticipate a clear three-wave move into wave (ii), aiming to find support around the $155 mark.  
    • The new month kicked off with several stock market indices hitting record highs on Thursday. Japan's Nikkei Average, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq all closed at fresh record peaks. The gains were buoyed by tech stocks like NVIDIA and Advanced Micro Devices. Stock markets are in an upbeat mood after US inflation figures came in line with expectations on Thursday. This helped shape forecasts for the timing of future Fed interest rate cuts. It extended the ongoing global equity rally and also pushed Treasury yields lower. The DAX also reached a new all-time high on Thursday. Europe opens today waiting for inflation data that should indicate inflation is moving back toward the 2% target. This comes after data showed inflation dropping in countries like Germany, France and Spain thanks to lower energy and food prices. The ECB has maintained record-high interest rates since September. Also on the calendar today is the US ISM manufacturing PMI.   
×
×
  • Create New...
us