Jump to content

Mifid 2 and pro experts? Please help


Recommended Posts

Good evening I wonder if anyone can help my situation as I feel lost.

So I have been with IG a year or so lost and won all retail and still use to today, my issue is with another provider of CFD but more electing as a pro.

So I elected as a pro a year ago ticked a few boxes back then not really knowing what they were back then and the pro status was given within a day, no checks nothing.  The issues then started as I had preset bet sizes which stupidly I didn’t noticed and lost some money which me wondering how this was possible as it was different to my IG experience.

I since then complained to no help as they say they made the right checks under mifid 2 but what checks??

 

They said that they ID me using databases they have, I get this might be possible but under Mifid you have to satisfy certain criteria to be accepted as a elected pro which all I done was tick some boxes, they said they did make checks and sent me a screen show of my linkedin which shows I worked in accounts but no the financial sector or had bet sizes etc.  They then mentioned I was a director on companies house again its not related.

So with all this frustration I went to the Financial Ombudsman which took ages but today they are agreeing with the CFD provider that checks were made?? Surely being a pro cant be a simple as a few tick boxes online and a job in accounts can it!?

Please if anyone has any ideas I have emailed back for the FO but feel Ive been told to shut up as the easy route as its quite complex or the sector is but mine just seems really stupid!  Perhaps it is that a few tick boxes and me working in finance and I can be explored to lose a lot, which if the case lesson learnt and ill just carry on with my IG retail as I have been doing as feel safer and tbh IG have always been good and no sneaky issues like this.

 

Thanks in advanced to any mifid and mifid 2 knowledgeable people out there.   

Link to comment
53 minutes ago, FDtoday said:

So I elected as a pro a year ago ticked a few boxes back then not really knowing what they were back then and the pro status was given within a day, no checks nothing.

Here's another example of what happens when you don't regulate the financial sector properly.

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, dmedin said:

Here's another example of what happens when you don't regulate the financial sector properly.

 

Esma fined a few companies for this and I gave FO examples, I under stand the ruling a lot now but at the time there was a lot of letting down I was happy to accept retail losses but FO seem happy with how mifid was carried out which to me feels so bad fo suffering how hard Esma come down on the ruling change it if it was that easy it would make a mockery of the whole catagory.  If I’m wrong I’ll admit it but feel off to me I do know of another that the losses were huge but haven’t reached out as I want to know how the mifid checks are meant to be carried out as the cob guide doesn’t state how

Edited by FDtoday
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      19,992
    • Total Posts
      87,954
    • Total Members
      69,143
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Someuser
    Joined 26/09/22 02:10
  • Posts

    • Stocks: AAPL, AMZN, NVDA, TSLA, GOOGL, BRK.B, SQ, META, NFLX, ENPH, MSFT, JPM. Elliott Wave  US Stock Bear Market: AMZN, AAPL, NVDA, TSLA, GOOGL, BRK.B, SQ, META, NFLX, ENPH, MSFT, BAC, JPM, GS. Elliott Wave Technical Analysis  Stock Market Summary: Elliott Wave Count: Wave (ii) or (iv) depending on the stock. Analysis US Stocks: Tesla TSLA, Amazon AMZN, Nvidia (NVDA), Apple AAPL, Microsoft MSFT, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK/B),Block, Inc (SQ), Meta Platforms, Netflix (NFLX), Enphase (ENPH), Alphabet GOOGL. XFL Finance Sector ETF, JPMorgan JPM & Bank of America BAC, Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) Stock Market Trading strategies: The market is still trending lower in the medium term. Continue on the short side of the market and short the corrective rally today.  Market News: The Fed will save the stock market and cut interest rates if a deep recession occurs next year, JPMorgan said./ Some U.S. firms wait to issue bonds in a bet rates will come down Video Chapters 00:00 SP500 00:58 Apple (AAPL) 07:03 NVIDIA (NVDA) 08:28 Amazon (AMZN) 10:50 Meta Platforms (META) 12:01 Netflix (NFLX)  14:42 Enphase (ENPH) 16:18 Tesla (TSLA) 20:30 Alphabet (GOOGL)  22:59 Microsoft (MSFT) 32:58 Block Inc. (SQ)  34:37 Banks JPM, GS 43:15 End. Thanks for supporting! Analyst Peter Mathers TradingLounge™ Australian Financial Services Licence - AFSL 317817 Source: tradinglounge com  
    • Theory: OMXS30 falls +-6% from 1818 points (24 SEP 2022) to 1703 Theory: OMXS30 falls +-6% from 1818 points (24 SEP 2022) to 1703 ------------------- Leo Olsson 24 SEP 2022 23:00 (CEST) Topics   Fall below the support line of 1871 points (strongest) MACD intersects signal line from above RSI trending down Next support line is at 1703 points, price is chasing support CBOE Equity Put/Call Ratio is lower than our last bottom on March 12, 2020 Ratio between the high point, 2470, on 3 JAN 2022 and the 1703 point                                                                                                                                                                                  is percentage-wise identical to the ratio between the high of 1870 points,                                                                                                                                                                            17 FEB 2020 and the low of 16 MAR 2020 (Corona, Approx. -30%)  Macroeconomic changes: interest rate hikes Other: MA 50 slips above MA 200 Benefits for long term savings: 1703 is the bottom reached?   _________________ Passed the support line at 1871 points The price fell through the support line at 1871 points. May indicate that the market is not satisfied with the price "only" falling to the 1870 line with the circumstances (macroeconomic changes, further down). Today's Equity Put/Call Ratio is longer than the last top on March 12, 2020 Source: Chicago Board Options Exchange The Equity Put/Call Ratio has been historically good at predicting bottoms and tops for the market. Right now, today's Put/Call Ratio is 0.2 units from the peak on March 12, 2020, which may indicate that a bottom has not been reached. This hypothesis is formed in conjunction with the fact that the price of the OMXS30 has crossed the support line and then not shown support for a new trend to occur.   The ratio between the high point and the point 1703 is percentage-wise identical to the similar event  Left: Previous event Right: Potential repeated event White Line: New Support The market likes to repeat itself. On 17 FEB 2020, the OMXS reached a new ATH only to fall sharply shortly after. The difference between the high of 1870 points, 17 FEB 2020 and the bottom quote 16 MAR 2020 (Corona) has about identical percentage ratio between the high point, 2470, 3 JAN 2022 and the point 1703, Ca, -30%.   MACD intersects signal line from above MACD 12 26 9 managed to cross the signal line from below but quickly thereafter MACD cut the signal line from above suggesting a bearish signal of continued decline.  RSI trending down White highlighted After the RSI 14 reached 50.00 it fell down, it is trending down and gives a bearish signal of continued decline.  The next support line is at 1703 points (Price Target) As the price crossed the support line at 1871 points, it is not unreasonable if the price is chasing a support to which it can fall back in troubled times and uncertainty. The particular support of 1871 is selected as a profit target for a short position from today's levels until then (1817 - 1703). The potential for the price to fall below the set support line at 1703 is entirely possible if the theory is correct. How the "newly set" support line can be positive for long term trading is discussed later.     Macroeconomic changes: interest rate hikes The one percentage point increase in the key interest rate on 20 Sep had a negative impact on the stock market for reasonable reasons. This macroeconomic change supports the claim of a continued decline. Benefits for long-term savings If the price falls to the support line 1703 and shows together with continuous volume and trading that 1703 is an active support line for the OMXS30 that is not broken, it can give a wonderful signal that a bottom has been reached. Cash intended for long-term savings can be invested in the index with the conscience of timing the market.  Other      MA 50 slips above MA 200 MA 50: Blue MA 200: Pink The MA 50 sliding above the MA 200 gives us neither a buy signal nor a sell signal but it guarantees that the MA 50 will most likely fall through the MA 200 and signal a downtrend.    
    • Hey @pravid17 I hope you're well.  In the leveraged trading industry there are brokers who don't hedge client's exposure and brokers (like ourselves) who do hedge client's exposure.  In a perfect world the exposure of short clients would net off the trades of long clients however this is not always the case. Our hedging model allows us to take an exposure in the underlying market for the remaining exposure which doesn't offset - This way we don't need to hedge every trade, worry about profits of our clients and results in lower costs for hedging in the underlying market (commissions, interest etc.). So say 60% of IG customer exposure in the ASX was long and 40% of exposure on the ASX was short. The 40% would net each other off but there's a remaining 20% of customers who need to be hedged to cover their positions. We go into the market and hedge this.  We make our money primarily through our spreads and overnight funding  with other fees making up a small proportion of our revenue. I would like to remind also that IG is regulated by several bodies globally, including top-tier regulators like the UK's FCA, Germany's BaFIN, Australia's ASIC - This should be quite reassuring from a dealing execution and transparency perspective.  I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other question 
×
×
  • Create New...