Jump to content

RV (Macro) And Convergence Trades


Recommended Posts

Long Dax, Short NKY, Long EURJPY.  Stops beyond recent lows/high on 1 hour charts (see picture).  Betting on (temporary) reversal of recent divergence (Dax near lower end of range, NKY near upper end;  this divergence between major exporters performance in spite of weakened EURJPY does not seem sustainable.  Bet is simultaneously also on global markets breakout out of recent ranges in either direction.  JPY weakened previous weak (reversing) - may indicate that reallocation of Japanese investors' from global to domestic stocks (if any..), which could have contributed to relative NKY strength, may have peaked before (of course unless they were mostly FX-hedged).  Japan's Covid advantage may have played a major role as well in establishing the divergence, so have most likely BoJ ETF purchases.  The former should by now be "priced in" - unless Europe Covid situations worsens drastically (relative Dax overnight outperformance may confirm this).  Would expect BoJ to at least not cause itself a significant breakout of NKY to the upside, and instead keep some powder at these levels.  Timing probably not ideal after strong DAX overnight move, guess (some) retracement before/at cash open likely, however also risky to have a one-directional trade open until then, hence rather Dax stop relatively wide.  Rising EURJPY would be strong factor justifying further NKY outperformance - hence long to reduce risk.  Ideally trade should run for a bit, however review after US open (if not stopped out..). 

C_1.thumb.png.144cca443b6762972200a7d4e4b71738.png

 

 

Link to comment

stop on short NKY was hit quickly.  closed EURJPY and Dax soon after for a small aggregate profit.  didn't expect Dax to extend gains that much today.  was unfortunately far too early, as it turned out.  guess with one leg closed so quickly I thought better safe than sorry, or just got nervous.  another one to learn from..

Link to comment
1 hour ago, AndrewS said:

because the two are so highly correlated

That was part of the idea of this "convergence trade".  Both tanked on Monday 21, but then Nikkei 225 more than fully recovered, while Dax did not (see picture above).  Not being aware of a reason that seemed (IMHO) strong enough to justify the extent of the difference in behavior of these recently more similarly moving indices, I positioned for the relative differences of Dax and Nikkei levels to their respective Monday opening levels to converge (in other words, I bet on their rate of returns since that day to approach a more similar value).  One could also say at that stage I considered the relative value of the Dax with respect to the Nikkei 225 as higher than the prices indicated.

The high correlation between the two instruments, if it persists, should cause such a trade to have lower risk than a directional position in either of these indices, because you are hedged against factors that impact both markets similarly.

Of course this doesn't come for free, but as you seem to have in mind, you're also not profiting when both markets move in the same direction - have I understood you correctly?

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, HMB said:

 

The high correlation between the two instruments, if it persists, should cause such a trade to have lower risk than a directional position in either of these indices, because you are hedged against factors that impact both markets similarly.

 

In practice I think such a trade has a higher risk because your exposure is twice as much by going long one index and short the other at the same time. Also there is additional risk because managing the two trades together is much more difficult than managing one trade. Since the two indices are so highly correlated I think it is lower risk to go long the Dax when the Nikkei is coming off support or to sell the Nikkei when the Dax is coming off resistance. The temporary out performance of one index relative to the other is much less of a story in comparison to the strong correlation.

This is the current correlations of the Dax to other indices for the past twenty periods..

GER30H1.jpg.b136103ae57c28066ce930f00baa731a.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
34 minutes ago, AndrewS said:

In practice I think such a trade has a higher risk because your exposure is twice as much by going long one index and short the other at the same time. Also there is additional risk because managing the two trades together is much more difficult than managing one trade. Since the two indices are so highly correlated I think it is lower risk to go long the Dax when the Nikkei is coming off support or to sell the Nikkei when the Dax is coming off resistance. The temporary out performance of one index relative to the other is much less of a story in comparison to the strong correlation.

This is the current correlations of the Dax to other indices for the past twenty periods..

GER30H1.jpg.b136103ae57c28066ce930f00baa731a.jpg

Think I know what you mean - of course, if you compare a combination of  two trades with a notional exposure of e.g. 10000 each with one trade with a notional exposure of 10000, you may lose more with the combination than with the single trade.  I should have stressed this more clearly - thanks for highlighting this.

 

Edited by HMB
Link to comment
On 29/09/2020 at 05:57, AndrewS said:

go long the Dax when the Nikkei is coming off support or to sell the Nikkei when the Dax is coming off resistance

took me a while, but think I understand that, too, now...  yes, I agree, in cases where only one index trades near clear support/resistance, the high correlations may justify taking such turns also as signal for the other index, depending on circumstances.  good point, will keep that in mind 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Wheat Elliott Wave Analysis Function - Counter Trend Mode - Corrective Structure -Zigzag for wave (B) Position - Wave A of (B) Direction - Wave A is still in play Details -  As it appears the decline from 720’4 will most likely continue lower, we have adjusted the previous count. Price is now very likely in wave A of (B) against the 523’6 low. Wheat Elliott Wave Analysis Since late May, wheat has declined over 14% from 720, indicating that the commodity has retraced approximately half of the impulse rally that occurred between March 11th and May 28th. In the medium term, the move from March 11th remains a positive correction of the long-term bearish trend that spanned from March 2022 to March 2024—a two-year trend.   Daily Chart Analysis: On the daily chart, wheat completed a bearish impulse wave from March 2022 at 523’6 in March 2024. Following this trend, a corrective phase was anticipated in the opposite direction. The impulse reaction that concluded wave (A) at the May 2024 peak is part of this larger bullish correction. Given that wave (A) is an impulse, we can expect at least a zigzag structure or possibly a double zigzag if the bullish correction extends over several months. Following the path of least resistance, a simple zigzag structure—wave (A)-(B)-(C)—is highly probable. Currently, the price is correcting wave (A) downwards in wave (B). Provided that the ongoing decline stays above 523’6, an extension higher is expected. However, wave (B) does not appear to be finished yet, as evident from the H4 chart.   H4 Chart Analysis: On the H4 chart, the price seems to be in wave A of (B), which is evolving into an impulse structure. We anticipate a typical zigzag structure for wave (B). The invalidation level at 523’6 should not be breached. If it is, the long-term bearish trend from March 2022 will likely resume, confirming that the bullish correction from March 2024 has concluded.   Summary: Wheat has seen a significant decline since late May, retracing half of its recent impulse rally. The medium-term trend from March 11th remains a positive correction within the context of a long-term bearish trend that lasted two years. On the daily chart, the completion of the bearish impulse wave in March 2024 was followed by a bullish correction, which is currently in wave (B) of a zigzag structure. The H4 chart suggests that wave A of (B) is forming an impulse structure, with expectations of a typical zigzag correction.   Traders should monitor the key level of 523’6. If this level holds, the bullish correction is likely to continue with a potential extension higher. However, a breach below 523’6 would invalidate this scenario, signaling a continuation of the long-term bearish trend.  Technical Analyst : Sanmi Adeagbo Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!  
    • ZkSync leverages zero-knowledge proofs to improve Ethereum's scalability, offering faster transactions with lower fees. Its use of zkRollups positions it as a promising solution for decentralized applications and DeFi platforms. On Bitget, traders can engage with ZkSync, taking advantage of the exchange's features like a user-friendly interface and robust security measures. While ZkSync presents an opportunity for growth, it's important for investors to conduct thorough research and consider the project's long-term potential in the evolving crypto landscape.
    • COST Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge Daily Chart, Costco Wholesale Corp., (COST) Daily Chart COST Elliott Wave Technical Analysis FUNCTION: Trend MODE: Impulsive STRUCTURE: Motive POSITION: Wave 5.   DIRECTION: Upside in wave {iii}. DETAILS: Looking for upside into wave {iii} as we seem to have completed wave {ii} of 5 after successfully completing the triangle in wave 4.     COST Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge 4Hr Chart, Costco Wholesale Corp., (COST) 4Hr Chart COST Elliott Wave Technical Analysis FUNCTION: Trend MODE: Impulsive STRUCTURE: Motive POSITION: Wave (iii) of {iii} DIRECTION: Wave (iii). DETAILS: Looking for upside into wave (iii), knowing we could switch to a more conservative count where current wave (i) and (ii) is wave {iii} and {iv}. Equality of {iii} vs. {i} stands at 900$.   Welcome to our latest Elliott Wave analysis for Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST). This analysis provides an in-depth look at COST's price movements using the Elliott Wave Theory, helping traders identify potential opportunities based on current trends and market structure. We will cover insights from both the daily and 4-hour charts to offer a comprehensive perspective on COST's market behavior.   * COST Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – Daily Chart* In our Elliott Wave analysis of Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST), we observe an impulsive trend characterized by a motive structure. COST is currently positioned in wave 5, specifically in wave {iii} of 5, indicating an upside move. After successfully completing the triangle in wave 4, COST has finished wave {ii} of 5 and is now poised to move higher into wave {iii}. This wave is expected to gain momentum, pushing prices upward as it unfolds. Traders should monitor the progression of wave {iii} closely, as it may present opportunities for long positions, especially if COST continues to show strength above key resistance levels.   *COST Elliott Wave Technical Analysis – 4Hr Chart* On the 4-hour chart, COST is also following an impulsive trend within a motive structure, specifically in wave (iii) of {iii}. The analysis suggests an upside continuation into wave (iii), with an awareness that current wave (i) and (ii) might be a more conservative count as wave {iii} and {iv}. This suggests that if the market confirms this alternate view, COST could target equality of wave {iii} vs. wave {i} at $900. Traders should be prepared for potential adjustments in the wave count and watch for consolidation or corrective patterns that might precede further upward movements.   Technical Analyst : Alessio Barretta Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!  
×
×
  • Create New...
us