Jump to content

Unlimited Money Glitch?

Recommended Posts

So we all know a sensibile investment strategy is to dollar cost average into an efficient market portfolio (like the S&P) over time and realise slow / lower risk steady gains over years.

However, what if we used this same strategy but in a spread bet / cfd account. Biweekly / monthly adding to a position at whatever price into the S&P 500 over time, would we make huge gains?

The logic being that (granted economic outlook is highly uncertain at the moment) in 33 of the last 40 years the S&P has increase yearly and averaged returns of 8%. These of course are modest gains usually but would be amplified using a spread bet or cfd platform.

I acknowledge I could be missing something obvious, but I'm pretty sure the S&P will reach 4000 this year, so why wouldn't adding a 1 lot position into the s&p (which usually goes up) every 2 weeks forever work?

  • Like 1
Link to comment

You would be paying a lot of fees in overnight fees. Plus, this is assuming the S&P will move in a straight upward line. However we do know markets hardly ever do that, so what is likely to happen is some major pullbacks along the way. Since your stop losses would have to be far below your entry points to accommodate these pullbacks, the margin requirement to keep the positions open is likely to be extremely high too. And all it takes is one major pullback to hit a lot of your stop losses, causing a large amount of losses in a short amount of time. I agree that in theory it could work but given current market instability the risk seems way too high for the reward. I might be missing something though.

Link to comment

If you use the futures and not the DFBs, you have no overnight funding fees.  However futures get rolled at expiry, when you pay the spread.  The way I understand this is that for example for SPX it's 1 point - four times a year, or roughly 0.1% of your exposure in total, but please confirm with IG client services, there may be an additional spread (like they have when you let contracts expire - see https://www.ig.com/uk/help-and-support/spread-betting-and-cfds/fees-and-charges/what-are-igs-indices-spread-bet-product-details, note 4 ii).


If you're a retail client, you'll have to maintain 20% margin for indices, I think, even with a guaranteed stop.  keep that in mind.  so when it goes against you, even before the roll you'll have to put up capital for every dollar unrealized loss.


Regarding "amplifying" - guess you're referring to leverage, then of course the question is how much, and correspondingly how much the market needs to tank to wipe you out...

As unlikely as it may seem, but there is no certainty that SPX will not drop 100%...  but let's say you rule out anything worse than -50%, then ok, you would need only 70 for an exposure of 100...

...but would be broke and exposure-free with a drop of 50.01%...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Joined 04/10/23 17:01
  • Posts

    • Yeah, there's a 20 in a hundred chances for you to make that kind of ROI these though I'm not completely ruling it out because I'm one of the few that benefitted from PEPE rise to stardom amassing a return of 10x on bitget after it got listed on binance
    • No doubt the impact of FTX crash has created a negative impression among crypto enthusiasts especially centralized exchange users. Of course FTX wasn't the first CEX to crash but its occurrence came as a shock looking at the position the crypto exchange occupies in terms of ranking and being the favourite cex for derivative trading before the sad event. This has questioned the integrity of CEXs and a lot of users have embraced DEX while others opt for a more secure and transparent CEX. Talking about security and transparency as a mechanism to make users have complete trust in the remaining CEXs, two things comes to mind and that's "Proof of Reserve" and "User Protection Fund". This are obviously a good indicator and post FTX development but how effective could this be looking at the numerous crypto currency exchanges out there. Among the top 10 ranking CEXs, only Binance and Bitget has a veriable proof of  users protection fund of $1B and $300M respectively. " Source from Nansen" Although some exchanges like OKX, Huobi and Bybit also claimed to have user protection funds but it is not publicly verifiable which of course raises eye brow about the integrity and transparency of such claim. We can't actually do without CEX because we need it for our daily trading hence the reasons why more effective measures needs to be taken to secure users funds. Though Binance and Bitget seems to be on the right path but it's also important for this CEX to declare their Proof of Liabilities because FTX also did about two audits before it collapsed. A lot of users are still skeptical keeping their assets on CEX due to fear of the unknown but could this development from Binance and Bitget restore trust and confidence back to users?
    • Yes, there are may time-sized cycle. I will bear in mind your data. It is very good. This is going to be an interesting year forward! All the best.  
  • Create New...