Jump to content
  • 0

Volume indicator - IG charts vs MT4 charts


TommyT

Question

The values of the volume indicator in the IG charts  and the MT4 charts are different - they are not the same values and they are not even a scalar proportion of each other

So where is IG getting is volume and where is MT4 getting its volume?

Using the IG Streaming Companion tool  one can see the various field values in the" Chart" data items of the stream 

Comparing this stream to the IG chart I can see that IG chart's volume is equivalent to the stream's LTV - last traded volume

doing the same for MT4 I can see that the MT4 chart's  volume is equivalent to the stream's LTV CONS_TICK_COUNT - tick count

Given that IG's own chart presents the LTV as the volume, it would seem that this is the preferred measure, and I have to agree. On that basis, I would say MT4 is using the wrong value

I would like to use MT4 to trade, but I don't like tick-count-as-volume. Is there anyway via the MT4 configuration or custom code that I can get hold of the LTV volume. Does anyone at IG know if the LTV data in MT4's tick variables so that I might be able to build my own indicator?

 

 

  

Link to comment

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
1 hour ago, TommyT said:

The values of the volume indicator in the IG charts  and the MT4 charts are different - they are not the same values and they are not even a scalar proportion of each other

So where is IG getting is volume and where is MT4 getting its volume?

Using the IG Streaming Companion tool  one can see the various field values in the" Chart" data items of the stream 

Comparing this stream to the IG chart I can see that IG chart's volume is equivalent to the stream's LTV - last traded volume

doing the same for MT4 I can see that the MT4 chart's  volume is equivalent to the stream's LTV CONS_TICK_COUNT - tick count

Given that IG's own chart presents the LTV as the volume, it would seem that this is the preferred measure, and I have to agree. On that basis, I would say MT4 is using the wrong value

I would like to use MT4 to trade, but I don't like tick-count-as-volume. Is there anyway via the MT4 configuration or custom code that I can get hold of the LTV volume. Does anyone at IG know if the LTV data in MT4's tick variables so that I might be able to build my own indicator?

 

 

  

Hi, which asset type are you looking at, FX looks the same on the IG web based platform and mt4.

Link to comment
  • 0
Quote

Hi, which asset type are you looking at, FX looks the same on the IG web based platform and mt4.

 

Casey,

Thank you for your response

I was looking at indices - ftse100 specifically by way of example.

I will check the same for FX and report what I find in that case too

Regards 

Edited by TommyT
include quote
Link to comment
  • 0
6 minutes ago, TommyT said:

 

Casey,

Thank you for your response

I was looking at indices - ftse100 specifically by way of example.

I will check the same for FX and report what I find in that case too

Regards 

I think MT4 can only use tick volume and FX uses tick volume for both platforms but indices are different.

For indices see Ludwik's reply to volume question 2 down.

click on  the pic (link) below.

 

Link to comment
  • 0
3 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

Hi, which asset type are you looking at, FX looks the same on the IG web based platform and mt4.

Casey,

From viewing the IG stream it appears that, for FX, the tick_count and LTV are the same value. This confirms that in MT4 indicators, for both FX and indices, the volumes are equal to the tick_count. 

Ludwig' response explains why FX uses tick count, but indicies can have a better, calculated LTV. Ludwig makes no reference to MT4.

I would infer that IG/MT4 feed had been poorly implemented to used the tick_count rather than LTV. For FX this is trivially equivalent but for indicies, this is sadly deficient. I will not be using MT4.

regards 

Link to comment
  • 0
13 hours ago, TommyT said:

Casey,

From viewing the IG stream it appears that, for FX, the tick_count and LTV are the same value. This confirms that in MT4 indicators, for both FX and indices, the volumes are equal to the tick_count. 

Ludwig' response explains why FX uses tick count, but indicies can have a better, calculated LTV. Ludwig makes no reference to MT4.

I would infer that IG/MT4 feed had been poorly implemented to used the tick_count rather than LTV. For FX this is trivially equivalent but for indicies, this is sadly deficient. I will not be using MT4.

regards 

The data that brokers provide for free is always going to be limited compared to subscription providers and MT4 has additional limitations being a third party platform.

Research has shown that tick volume data is relative to real volume data but at end of day it's a case of how much we are willing to pay and what level of accuracy we require. 

Link to comment
  • 0

 

On 25/09/2021 at 09:28, Caseynotes said:

The data that brokers provide for free is always going to be limited compared to subscription providers and MT4 has additional limitations being a third party platform.

Research has shown that tick volume data is relative to real volume data but at end of day it's a case of how much we are willing to pay and what level of accuracy we require. 

Casey,

Thank you for all your input on this - much appreciated.

As "free" streams go IGs is quite good. I make the assumption that the integration into MT4 uses this stream, as the correlation to tick count is so exact. I just wish MT4 took advantage of better features of the stream. Perhaps my assumption is wrong and MT4's feed is generic which is independent of the underlying broker

There is some rough correlation between tick volumes and trade volumes but it is far from a linear scalar and diverges even further at higher volumes, when the market is more volatile. For this reason I disregard it

I have looked at other feeds and the best I could discover in terms of content was dxFeed, though like many other similar broker-oriented feeds it is too expensive for me given the base+exchange increment price structure. Of the free or "inclusive" feeds, I think there are none better than IG's so I will happily use the IG feed, though I will be using the REST access. The sample app is very useful once one sorts the 3rd party package updates.

Regards Tom

Link to comment
  • 0
34 minutes ago, TommyT said:

 

Casey,

Thank you for all your input on this - much appreciated.

As "free" streams go IGs is quite good. I make the assumption that the integration into MT4 uses this stream, as the correlation to tick count is so exact. I just wish MT4 took advantage of better features of the stream. Perhaps my assumption is wrong and MT4's feed is generic which is independent of the underlying broker

There is some rough correlation between tick volumes and trade volumes but it is far from a linear scalar and diverges even further at higher volumes, when the market is more volatile. For this reason I disregard it

I have looked at other feeds and the best I could discover in terms of content was dxFeed, though like many other similar broker-oriented feeds it is too expensive for me given the base+exchange increment price structure. Of the free or "inclusive" feeds, I think there are none better than IG's so I will happily use the IG feed, though I will be using the REST access. The sample app is very useful once one sorts the 3rd party package updates.

Regards Tom

You're welcome, am fairly certain that all mt4 markets use tick volume which is number of trades but no indication of the size of trades but think that MT5 is upgraded to include real volume though not sure where that data might come from. If coming from an exchange then presumably there must be a subscription charge. IG are working towards providing MT5 but no time frame as yet.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Recently, U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty from Tennessee spoke at the Bitcoin conference, stating his efforts to push for Bitcoin-supportive legislation to promote freedom and opportunity. This year, cryptocurrency has become a key battleground in the election campaigns. It remains to be seen whether future policies on cryptocurrency will improve.
    • The digital landscape is undergoing a profound transformation as attention, once a freely given commodity, is increasingly recognized as a valuable asset. Layer3 is at the forefront of this revolution, pioneering a new economy where attention can be owned, traded, and monetized   This innovative approach empowers individuals to monetize their engagement, providing unprecedented control over personal data. Simultaneously, advertisers benefit from transparent metrics that optimize campaign performance. Content creators are presented with diverse revenue avenues beyond traditional advertising, while the overall ecosystem experiences a more equitable distribution of value.   The implications of Layer3 extend across various sectors. Social media platforms, for instance, can leverage this technology to revolutionize user engagement and monetization strategies. Tokenomics play a crucial role in driving Layer3's economy, incentivizing participation and rewarding value creation. While challenges such as data privacy and market volatility exist, the potential benefits of Layer3 are immense   Anticipation is building as its native token $L3 is on Bitget Pre-market as users await its listing on the exchange. This milestone is expected to significantly increase the token's visibility and accessibility, potentially driving substantial growth and attracting new investors. As the countdown begins, the crypto community watches with keen interest, eager to see how Layer3 will perform in this new chapter.
    • I've been exploring the world of play-to-earn gaming recently, looking for something that's not just about endless grinding but actually offers a fun and rewarding experience. OGC really stood out to me because it combines gaming with a sense of community in a unique way. OGC isn't just a game; it's a platform where you can play, earn, and even help shape its future. You're not just a player; you're part of a community with a voice. The idea of earning crypto while playing games is exciting, but what makes OGC special is its focus on community involvement. Your feedback can directly influence the development of the game, which is a big deal. I've also heard that the OGC token is available for pre-market trading on Bitget. While I'm still getting to know the platform and its features, it's definitely something to keep an eye on. Has anyone else tried OGC? What has your experience been like? I'd love to hear your thoughts and any tips you might have.
×
×
  • Create New...
us