Jump to content

Where to next for the FTSE 100, DAX 40 and Dow Jones Industrial Average?


Recommended Posts

With ongoing worries about the state of the global economy where are equity indices headed?

IndicesSource: Bloomberg
 
 Axel Rudolph | Market Analyst, London | Publication date: Thursday 07 July 2022 

Minor equity market recovery seen despite global recession fears

As US markets opened up again after Independence Day on Monday, European and US equity markets swiftly sold off on global recession fears, driven by soaring inflation, reduced productivity and all G7 central banks, except the Bank of Japan (BoJ), expected to pursue their aggressive monetary policies.

Despite the publication of the latest US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) minutes on Wednesday showing that another 50- or 75 basis point (bps) US Federal Reserve (Fed) rate hike in July is in the pipeline, the resignation of the UK prime minister, Boris Johnson as Conservative party leader and much weaker than expected industrial production in Germany, equity markets are staging another minor bounce.

German industrial production only increased by 0.2% month-on-month in May compared to an expected 0.4% and an upwardly revised 1.3% in April, as the ongoing shortage of primary products and supply chain constraints caused by the war in Ukraine and lockdowns in China weigh on production.

The fact that several key ministers in the UK, such as the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, have resigned from Johnson’s cabinet before he was also forced to step down as party chairman on Thursday, had little impact on the FTSE 100. The index continues its recovery rally for now despite Mr Johnson saying that he will serve “until a new leader is in place” with a caretaker government being in charge until a new party leader and prime minister is appointed.

Meanwhile all eyes are on Friday’s US non-farm payroll (NFP) data which is likely to determine at least the next few days’ trends in equity indices and futures. This comes at a time when a recent Bloomberg Economics forecast said the odds of a US recession in the next year stands at 38% and investor sentiment remains at consistently low levels. On the other hand, there are signs that the inflationary bubble may well deflate later in the year as commodity prices continue to slide, with wheat prices for example trading back at pre-Ukraine invasion levels, the question is what conclusion should be drawn on where equity markets are headed in the second half of the year ahead of earnings season.

The technical outlook may have clues as to the ensuing trend in equity indices

While macro-economics and geo-politics determine the long-term business cycle, technical analysis, by its virtue drills down on price and volume analysis and does not focus on the “why” markets move and may thus shed a clearer light on the shorter-term timeframes.

With this in mind let’s analyse the FTSE 100, DAX 40, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average from a technical perspective.

FTSE 100’s bounce continues despite UK prime minister’s resignation

The FTSE 100 opened higher on the back of stronger US and then Asian markets on Thursday and targets its two-month resistance line at 7,252 and this week’s high at 7,289.

However, it will only confirm a medium-term bullish reversal once a rise and daily chart close above the late June high and the 200-day simple moving average (SMA) at 7,362 to 7,366 has occurred. If so, the February to May highs at 7,649 to 7,688 would be back in focus.

Minor slips may find support between the 14 June low at 7,134 and the 1 July low at 7,100 but a drop through the June and this week’s low at 7,012 to 6,966 would put the March low at 6,764 back on the map.

In this scenario further downside is expected to be seen with November 2016, December 2018 lows and June 2020 high at 6,534 to 6,516 being eyed.

FTSE 100 chartSource: ProRealTime

DAX 40 breaks one-month downtrend line

The DAX 40 continues its recovery rally from Tuesday’s low at 12,386, made marginally below its March low at 12,432, and is in the process of breaking through the two-month downtrend line at 12,727 with the 23 June low at 12,838 representing the next upside target, followed by Monday’s high at 12,965.

For a medium-term bullish reversal to gain traction, however, a rise and daily chart close above the 21 and 27 June highs at 13,383 to 13,444 would need to be seen. Only then could an extended rise back towards the late March to June highs at 14,712 to 14,927 unfold.

Minor support is seen at the 30 June low at 12,617 and more significant support at the March low at 12,432 and this week’s low at 12,386. Failure at the latter level on a daily chart closing basis would open the way for the 50% retracement of the 2020-to-2021 bull market at 12,110 to be reached.

A much deeper decline towards the October 2020 low at 11,332 would then most likely also ensue.

DAX 40 chartSource: ProRealTime

Dow continues to gradually advance despite June FOMC minutes pointing to further rate hikes

The Dow Jones Industrial Average’s recovery from this week’s 30,356 low is ongoing despite the publication of the latest US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) minutes pointing to another 50- or 75-basis point rate hike in July with the three-month downtrend line at 31,745 and the late June high at 31,885 remaining in the frame.

Only a rise above the 33,460 early June high would signal that this time round a prolonged up leg is underway with the February and March highs at 35,383 to 35,862 being targeted in this case.

Minor support can be spotted at this and last week’s lows at 30,422 to 30,356 and more significant support at the 29,649 June trough.

Failure there would most likely not only engage the pre-pandemic February 2020 high at 29,568 but also the 200-week simple moving average (SMA) at 29,402 as well as the August 2020 high at 29,198.

DJIA chartSource: ProRealTime
Link to comment

Thank you for the info, above.

And good points made.

Plenty of volatility will remain, time to time, in my view. It seems to be a first that the FED acted fast (though still behind the curve), and the rates were raised. Good for them. Unlike EU central bank with their their own creative accounting practices. It would also be good if the FED stop the constant reporting with double meanings interruptible and instead change to give a decisive, firm "it is this, or that we will do this next. The maybes, wait and see, future says xxx, are not of any help in solving the immediate issues and major problems that exist now. Besides it shows they appear to be uncertain despite all the metrics they have at their disposal. And the market takes over control with a relatively better reaction, or volatility, or a brief period of uncertainty.

We are NOT out of the woods after years of QE which creates many consequences, it gets any central banker into trouble, along with the rest of the world that has been advised to copy and use this theory. We worry about the geo-politics and war but we create our own domestic problems that are far worse in its effects. JUST LOOK AT ANY RECESSION / DEPRESSION THAT EVER HAS BEEN, SERIOUSLY, AND YOU SHOULD THEN SEE WHAT I MEAN. THAT ALSO SHOWS NO CENTRAL BANK EVER ACTUALLY SOLVED THE PROBLEMS AND THE "SOLUTIONS" GIVEN, INTERNATIONALLY, FAILED TO CURE THE CONDITONS. THOSE ARE THE PAST AND PRESENT FACTS.

The market big boys ( other then the users) who pushed up the commodities prices sky high have taken a breather by taking their big profits. It is NOT all external causes that pushed up hugh rises. So these energy prices  may come down FOR NOW. FOR STABILTY THE FED SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS TO NOT BRING RATES DOWN FAST IN MY OPINION. 

A major problem to worry about for the government and central bankers are the key factors that THEY HAVE NOT ADDRESED. IF A FUTURE RECESSION or a DEPRESSION IS TO BE KEPT UNDER BETTER CONTROL with a relative shorter PERIOD THEN WOULD OTHERWISE  BE PRESENT.

As very smart as many central bankers maybe, the ability to actually solve problems is a different trait. I mean that the economic and financial calamities destructive effects can be reduced and the financial world can live through it, without pushing further covert taxes on the average citizens, or by transferring other toxic costs of companies and banks away from them. Otherwise it encourages malpractices and other financial abuses. These often come to attention during bad times. There are several fundamental natural laws that are abused which in turn, eventually, causes a dwindling spiral of problems for all. The funny thing is the FED was designed and set up by a private group of banks ( "The Bankers Club" ) in order to save their bacon in any calamities by them providing the solutions afterwards. If the central bankers are great then  how come they are not in good health? Which factors were allowed to be abused to lead to that?

It seems we have got into the habit of not letting individual companies and banks into taking their own responsibilities to solve their own caused problems, or THEM NOT SEEING THEM COMING. Whatever the external factors that come in their way they should be street wise analysts and executives to work through that, shouldn't they?

 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      19,989
    • Total Posts
      87,951
    • Total Members
      69,142
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Bobminor
    Joined 25/09/22 20:58
  • Posts

    • Hey @pravid17 I hope you're well.  In the leveraged trading industry there are brokers who don't hedge client's exposure and brokers (like ourselves) who do hedge client's exposure.  In a perfect world the exposure of short clients would net off the trades of long clients however this is not always the case. Our hedging model allows us to take an exposure in the underlying market for the remaining exposure which doesn't offset - This way we don't need to hedge every trade, worry about profits of our clients and results in lower costs for hedging in the underlying market (commissions, interest etc.). So say 60% of IG customer exposure in the ASX was long and 40% of exposure on the ASX was short. The 40% would net each other off but there's a remaining 20% of customers who need to be hedged to cover their positions. We go into the market and hedge this.  We make our money primarily through our spreads and overnight funding  with other fees making up a small proportion of our revenue. I would like to remind also that IG is regulated by several bodies globally, including top-tier regulators like the UK's FCA, Germany's BaFIN, Australia's ASIC - This should be quite reassuring from a dealing execution and transparency perspective.  I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other question 
    • A survey from Reviews.org, which featured 1000 Americans, found that as many as 1 in 4 US subscribers may quit the service in the next year.    Jeremy Naylor | Writer, London | Publication date: Friday 23 September 2022  There was an interesting breakdown, but the main reason was affordability. Only 18% said they would move to a cheaper competitor. IGTV’s Jeremy Naylor looks at the numbers. Netflix subscription woes Netflix Inc (All Sessions) could be in for a rough time ahead over the next 12 months if a new survey is anything to go by, which was conducted in the US. Out of the 1,000 adults that took part in this survey undertaken by Reviews.org, around 25% of those that were covered said that they would be cancelling their Netflix subscription within the next 12 months. Now, it says with that 25% of US subscribers to Netflix considering leaving, not to join a competitor, but mostly because of pressures on household bills. This is how it is split: rising cost of subscriptions - 40% inflation - 20% a lack of content - 22% spending more time on the services of others - 18% So you can see, a minority said they were going to other services, such as those provided by Disney Plus or Amazon Prime. The cost of Netflix has risen dramatically this year as its basic plan increased by 11% in January and its other plans by 20% to 25%. Now these were the first price increases for three years, so that itself is relatively new for a lot of subscribers. Netflix share price Let's take a look at the Netflix share price. You can see on the far left hand side of this chart the COVID lows at $290.39. We saw a whacking great increase there of 141% to the top and the record high in Netflix shares back in November 2021. And that was when subscriptions were rising, people were paying more for their services, and it was all humming beautifully. And then all of a sudden people started questioning the numbers of streaming services they were undertaking with some deciding to withdraw from Netflix. All of a sudden the big drops started coming through with profit warnings and sales warnings. We've recently hit a new low of $162.50. Since then there has been a little bit of an increase. We're currently trading at $232.75, but we are down by a margin of 1.75% in today's session, which reflects this news that we could well see a relatively large drop in subscribers for Netflix in the US within the next 12 months.
    • Market data to trade the week of 26 September: Nasdaq; NXT From the economic calendar next week IG technical analyst, Axel Rudolph, picks up on a short trade on the Nasdaq around US inflation data. Meanwhile, despite another light week of corporate data, Axel picks out the chart of Next plc (NXT) as an interesting trade to think about.          
×
×
  • Create New...