Jump to content

FTSE100 - Daily Analysis


Chanakya

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 263
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Could be  but there is strong support at about 5850ish which coincides with the Fib 62%.  Based on the profile of the FTSe it looks to me like the market has turned into a wave 3 down, hopefully the first of several, but the restraining factor so far has been the US markets.  If they catch a bid back up, very likely in my view, then the FTSE will be dragged back up.  However, as mentioned previously, I don't see the non US markets making fresh all time highs.  We really need to see the US markets make the turn (whether with fresh all time highs or not) before we can get excited about the prospect of a sustained Bear market.  With Gold almost certainly confirmed as in a Bull rally (see Gold post from this morning) and commodities tipping back into a possible wave 4 final Bear phase things are set well.  Now all we need is those pesky American optimists to wake up and smell the coffee!

 



Link to comment

FT poll of polls has the 2 sides neck and neck but if you only look at online polls (i.e. exclude telephone polls where they do not give a "don't know" options) then Leave is ahead.  This is interesting as conventional polling wisdom has it that when you do not give a don't know option people tend to go with status quo.  The open question is whether these people would also vote status quo, make their minds up at the last minute or neglect to vote.

 

All-in all it is too close to call.

 

https://ig.ft.com/sites/brexit-polling/?ftcamp=traffic/sem/tactical_brexit/uk_google/essence_sem/auddev

Link to comment

You guys seen the pretty reliable V-shaped patterns in FTSE over the past 8 months? 5/8 of those months we have seen the market sell-off heavily and bottom out in the middle third of the month (11-20th). Another one to come this month?

 

 



Link to comment

Hi  I don't know anything about Vs so can't really comment.  You chart did remind me that I wanted to relook at the FTSE100 in the context of US markets achieving new all time highs and to try and make better sense of the moves on the FTSE 100 since the 2015 highs.  It has always bothered me that the moves had not fitted into any obvious pattern, being a bit choppy as your Vs demonstrate.

 

Looking again at the big picture charts I am much happier with a count to the Feb 2016 low as a large scale wave 1 rather than assuming we are already into a wave 3.  That would mean mean the current rally is a wave 2 retrace rather than a motive wave up to fresh all time highs (note: this may well not be the case for the US markets, in fact almost certainly they are in a motive wave up to all time highs).  However the recent retrace highs, that initially looked like the Wave 2, is more likely to be a Wave A of the A-B-C retrace because that wave fits a 1-5 profile better than an A-B-C.  That would mean the move down to 15 June low was a Wave B and now we are in a Wave C, which is usually a strong wave, as we have seen so far.  I expect a retrace of the initial move up to complete a 1-2 pattern followed by a strong wave 3 up with the wave C completing in or around the monthly resistance level of 6750, which coincides with the Fib 76.4% off the all time high in 2015 and a possible touch on the Weekly tramline.  Whether the small retrace happens before or after the Brexit results we shall have to wait and see.  Getting in coul dbe  a bit tricky around Brexit of course.

 

 

Link to comment

It could go up or it could go down, no question.  If you are day trading then I fancy we may see a bit of risk being taken off the table as the vote/results loom and doubts set in.

 

If hedgeye.com is correct about Remain being priced into GBP (don't know how they know that or think that other than judgement but on this topic for sure they are closer to the market than I) then it could follow that it is also priced into the FTSE.  As such a Remain result should not move the market too much, a bit of a relief rally perhaps, and then a return to the big picture trends.

 

Obviously a Leave result would most likely have a big impact to the downside.

 

The the polls neck and neck it seems like the markets are siding with the bookies rather than the polls and assuming that fear of change and "better the ***** you know" sentiment will win out.  the contrarian in me wants to go the other way but with neck and neck polls this could really go either way.

 

If you held a gun to my head and asked for a prediction I'd have to say Remain will edge it but any rally will be short lived.  This is actually a better result for me as it gives a decent change to get in of post euphoria reversals.  A Leave is a catalyst for a big and quick drop that will be hard to take advantage of.  Would have to wait for a retrace.

 

As such I am out of the market until the result and the subsequent overreaction and then I will reassess my long term projections as back to business as usual.  Well central bank manipulations as usual...

Link to comment

Agreed  and it is impossible to gauge what is or is not priced in, hence my default to technicals and sentiment indicators in the big picture.  I can't justify a trade right now but it is important to keep analysing for scenarios so you have a plan once the Brexit thing is settled.  My comments regarding upside vs downside were more to do with GBP rather than FTSE100 in the context of Brexit.  I see upside on stock indices still but not that much and once this current rally tops out (possible fresh all time highs for the US large caps but falling short of that for other markets) then the big drop must surely be on.  This is all Brexit aside.

 

My guess is for a Remain vote but narrowly not the 70/30 of the bookies and IG binaries.  A close vote means the issues is not dead, just like the Scottish independence vote (BTW, does anyone else think the SNP remain position is hypocritical and self serving?).  It also puts the wind up the establishment almost as much as a Leave vote and we have already heard senior politicos in Europe saying that regardless of a remain vote things will have to be looked at to address the Leave side issues.  It retains uncertainty over the future of the EU because, just as in Scotland, Leave will not pack it in after a close vote and other countries might be encouraged to ask for their own referendum.

 

Therefore any Remain rally dividend will be short lived in my view and the economic picture has not changed, nor has the fact that all assets everywhere are in a massive bubble.  Only a massive Remain win can negate this, can anyone see that happening?

Link to comment

Brexit or not the FTSE 100 looks set for a retrace down at or near 6,300, which  called a little while back.  For me the EW count looks right, could be a small further leg up yet but we are in the resistance zone about the 6,300 mark and bigger picture this fits will a wave 1 up turning point so a wave 2 retrace before a strong rally in wave 3 - Brexit Remain vote as a catalyst?  Could bee worth a Short but only if you get out before the vote results.

 



Link to comment

Likely some risk off consolidation unless there is some dramatic poll suggesting a big swing to Remain.  At neck and neck anyone betting on Remain has to be sweating it as a result against them will be much more dramatic that a result against anyone with a Leave position.

Link to comment

Yes, panic over?  Well maybe for the moment, on Brexit at least.  Slightly different story on FX, although we are getting a retrace just now.  I am waiting for a retrace on stocks before seeking a Long position.  I prefer to trade the US large Caps if going Long, European markets are weaker and subject to volatility until the end game shows the Bear is fully under way.

Link to comment

Will be interesting to see whether the Carney/Osborne planned response to Brexit was all bluster or will be backed up by real substance.  For my money they have to do something, even if it is just symbolic, or they will look like they have no plan at all.  Injections of capital into the banking system and lower rates are likely but how far will they actually go?  Surely lower rates hurts GBP in theory, do they want a lower pound or do they not, this is unclear to me.  Can't see anything they do quelling the uncertainty, only time and a trade deal with the EU and other major countries (especially on services) will do the trick and that will take years.

 

Interestingly GBP seems to have started off the day a bit stronger after a small retrace late last night and over night but stock indices are retracing down, before the next next up in my view.

Link to comment

Is a FTSE 100 retrace back down about to start?  If we are to see new all time highs on US large Caps and an associate bounce to a big picture Wave 2 (purple on charts below) turning point then the FTSE100 should be in a Wave C up.  A likely place for a retrace would be in the area of the Wave A (pre Brexit vote high).  My current EW count suggests that this is not Wave 3 of Wave C yet but a smaller internal count, although clearly it could be the bigger wave 3.  A strong retrace down would suggest the latter, which would then be followed by a final wave 5 to the top of the rally (possible top of the US market).

 

You can see the congestion zones on the 4 hourly and a zoom in on the hourly chart shows Neg Mom Div on the likely turning point.

 

Anyone got a view on the short term and bigger picture on the FTSE at all?

 

 

Link to comment

Sod law  but the reason is the Carney speech at the BoE.  He didn't say much apart from the usual "we will do what it takes" stuff but that seems to be all it takes these days for the bulls to take another huge swig of coolade.  Coming out of thee speech is a MSM assumption of more QE and a reduction in interest rates however I heard him give a nod to the detrimental affect of zero rates on bank profitability and stability, I wonder...

 

In any case GBP dropped and regardless of what he does this is the prevailing trend, at least until we get to USD parity.  As for the stock market, I still see a short term dip, US led followed by another charge up. 

Link to comment

I think its better to stay away from FTSE100 until brexit settles down, because it moving up and down without any pattern or logic...

I will personally try to focus on GBP/USD and try to catch the last ride all the way 1.25 and then 1.20 hopefully.

Also, I am following Long Gold and Short Crude opportunities...

Link to comment

Interesting  you positions seem to suggest that you seek to find a trend and follow it?  This is a great strategy as it has often been said that "the trend is your friend".

 

However there is an addendum to that saying and it goes like this, "until the bend in the end..."

 

We have discussed Oil elsewhere, and actually you are looking for the turn there but check out my Gold post and take care on that one in the short to medium term, it could be in for a strong retrace.

 

Regards the FTSE, I am inclined to agree it is hard to trade it but no more so than any other stock index just now.  I don no think Brexit is a big deal for anything except GBP (and probably FTSE250) and that was happening anyway owing to fundamentals (see Brexit thread for a lot more thoughts from people on that topic).  I expect the current retrace that we are in to continue to a short while and then the next leg of the rally to take hold.  FOMC minutes released yesterday basically said USD rate rise on hold until they see whether or not last months disappointing NFP data was a one off or something else.  If we get another poor NFP on Friday then all take of a rate rise is off the table andin fact talk of further stimulus will then come back on the table.  This would have two impacts in my view:

  1. Rally in FX crosses against the USD (probably relatively brief and then other factors will take over again)
  2. Rally in stock indices as fears of rate rise dissipate and hopes for more Fed and BoE stimulus are rekindled 

Personally I prefer to trade US large caps under this scenario as there are drag factors on European stocks connected with the political uncertainty and, in the case of the FTSE, mining, property and banking stock.

Link to comment

Hi  ,

 

With all my respect, If it is come to US QE, I cannot even think about where EU, UK economy and GBP will be...

I think very hard times wating for UK while Brexit negotiations (EU needs to make an example). Loosing banking passport rights, EUR clearing business and maybe single market access (Winter might come)...

 

Cheers!

Link to comment

HI   I'm not 100% sure what you are saying but I would suggest that Brexit (fact and negotiations) is a distraction.  In any case we cannot analyse for it as we don't know what will happen.  We also don't know what will happen to the EU.

 

Whether Brexit was in or out makes no different to my long term assessment.  All that out does is bring the UK and EU economies and political uncertainty into sharper focus and that is the beginning of the end of this Central Banker (fraudulent in my view - if not legally then morally as very many ordinary people are going to be hurt badly) bull market.  I am extremely Bearish.

 

Having said that I don't think the central bankers, their political taskmasters and their big business paymasters (commonly referred to as the global elites, and not in a respectful way) will "go quietly into that good night".  So I anticipate containing poor economic data (possibly starting with NFP today and certainly in Q2 earnings season) followed quickly by central bank stimulus and the associated rally we have come to expect from such actions.  After that the air gets too thin and reality dawns that this is all a massive political ponzi scheme and the watch out!

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      19,501
    • Total Posts
      86,847
    • Total Members
      68,751
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    keasmarof
    Joined 09/08/22 12:10
  • Posts

    • It is still a wonder to me that Central banks do NOT get it, and perhaps industry. Yes, wage increase pressures are present. That SHOULD BE EXPECTED. Yes, companies have reasons to increase their prices. That too IS EXPECTERD. WHY? PRIMARY FACT: Central Banks have FAILED TO CONTROL INFLATION. THERE IS NO GETTING AROUND IT WITH JUSTIFICATIONS. Taking up various "toxic debts" of banks and companies does not solve excess money printing (now called QE). This only transfer's somebody else's debts onto the government side with no exchange in return, and then getting general bond holders to pay part of it by charging negative interest rates. The culprits who CAUSED THE TOXIC DEBITS go scotch free and it encourages them to maintain such bad practices. It is ODD no central banker thinks of things like this that is SO important. So remind me, what are they professional in? Governments are supposed to take care of the general population's financial welfare, not private industries. Handle the excess money printing, you handle the inflation. Interest rates having to shoot up is a sign of past mishandlings, e.g., using ultra low interest rates ever so long incorrectly. It IS because of this that purchasing power of the currency is lost. It is BECAUSE OF THIS that individual wages and price increases need to take place, rightly, to keep up with the increase of the cost of living. Yet governments and central banks worry about wage increases and price increases as a menace. And they try to limit wage increase. Price increases occur but then their customers cut-back on spending as they cannot afford as much. This IS AN INVERSION in thinking by officials. It develops a vicious circle. The primary source of the problem is out of mind, yet it has been so well known for decades. SIMPLE BASICS ARE NEGLECTED, OR JUST MISUNDERSTOOD. THIS APPLIES TO ALL CENTRAL BANKS, who seem to be copying each other in actions. Mervyn King, ex-UK central bank chief seems to be the only one who has some understanding on the problems of central bankers. It is understandable the the BoE wishes not to head into recession or reduce significantly the GDP by attempting to control interest rate increase. But that is misguided in my opinion. WHY? Rates level manage the Macro-economics, loans, savings and mortgages level control. It is the individual company's operating condition that is neglected. Each company may be responsible for it but they (some) can act poorly, cut corners, use creative accounting, unethical practices, no cash flow, huge debts, not growing organically, non-profitable, taking too huge a risk, etc... IT IS THIS AT THE MICRO-ECONOMIC LEVEL THAT THE HEALTH OF BUSINESSES ARE NOT GUIDED. When a plane is in operation, takes off and fly's it is in good hands, with good control. When "things" go wrong and the plane is out of control we have bad control (for whatever the reason). Similarly the ECONOMY IS IN BAD CONTROL . Governments and bankers think Marco economics will "solve" everything  --  it comes out in the way they operate. Letting companies borrow until they have the highest debts ever in history is just one sign of 'bad control'. No banker would over loan a household individual more than he / she can pay back. And oh, they are always made to be paid back. Individual companies can over burden themselves with huge debts yet continue as nothing is wrong, no alarms, no worries. That is, until some economic trigger brings it down and cause an expected domino-effect. But bankers are clever there are government subsides, tax-relief, and transfer toxic debts relief plans in existence, then "all should be well"!!!! REALLY? HISTORY TEACHES US DIFFERENTLY. WHAT IS WRONG? For one, you make the taxpayer pay for others loans, costs, expanses, etc... call it what you will. So industry does not pay its own way as a private industry.  Industry then goes back to the same old bad practices. Then, later, they wonder why the average GDP now is not as good as prior to previous recession!!!!! HEY, HAVE YOU NOT REALISED THAT YOU CHOCKED OFF THE BASIC FOUNDATION THAT INVESTING IS BASED ON.   -----   SAVERS AND INVESTORS. The thinking is something like this: No, we  have to have these existing plans. WE GOT TO KEEP SAVERS SPENDING, SPENDING SPENDING ANY WHICH WAY WE CAN FORCE THEM. WHY, IT IS THE DEBTS WE BUILD-UP  -- IT IS TOO MUCH AND HAVE TO PAY THEM OFF SOMEHOW -  WE GOT TO MAKE THEM PAY....... AND GROW THE ECONOMY OUT OF THIS MESS. BESIDES BANKERS WANT THEIR LOANS PAID, AFTER THEY COLLECTED HUGE INTEREST PAYMENTS OVER A LONG PERIOD, AND SO ADVICE GOVERNMENT HOW TO "SOLVE IT". After all these years we are no better off. And all end up suffering. The western countries, at least, are living beyond their means. THIS IS THE DWINDLING SPIRAL. IT HAPPENS OVERS DECADES.  
    • Hi All, Thanks for your posts.  IG will be booking preference shares on a 1 for 1 basis. Thank you - Arvin
    • Still no response by email or on here, can't get through to anyone on the phone. I would say poor communication from IG, but its literally non existent.
×
×
  • Create New...