Jump to content

How to use Commitments of Traders data


Recommended Posts

Recently we have touched on an interesting and oft little know resource that technical and fundamentals traders alike leverage.  The US Commodity and Futures Trading Commission issues the positions "commitments" of traders on the exchanges covering a wide range of markets (see link below).

https://www.cftc.gov/MarketReports/CommitmentsofTraders/index.htm

Now traders will use this in different ways, as with everything in trading there are likely to be several different approached.  Here is how I use COT data within my trading methodology.  Note that I am a long term swing traders so I am looking for major trend changes to enter high probability/low exposure positions.  Note also that a big part of this strategy for anyone doing it is to be contrarian when it makes sense (i.e. bet against the herd at the end of the trend as they pill over the cliff!).

I am using Gold to illustrate this as I have been actively using it to inform my Gold trading, especially when I went Long in Sept  & Nov 2018 (see my Gold and Silver Rally thread for the history on that one if you are interested)

The bottom line on this is quite simple.  When the the Non Commercials are heavily net one way or the other, based on historical swings and peaks and this occurs where my technical analysis is showing a turn I get ready to go the opposite way.  most of these Non Commercials are trend followers and have to be in the market, where as retail traders can sit it out and wait, this is our one big advantage.  The chart below shows annotations of where the Non commercials have been peak Long when the market turns down and vice versa.

Food for thought.  PS I use the combined Futures and Options data set.

XAUUSD-Weekly-211218COT.thumb.png.5a7c88b2c2f2140fcf5e02414bc96adf.png

 

 

Link to comment

Here is the COT assessment of the S&P500.  It isn't as clear cut as Gold, which is not surprising really.  The Miners clearly know more about the Gold industry, especially supply and demand, than anyone else so they drive the market and the Financials are left to respond to events that the Miners obviously know about first.  Also when it comes to commodities the players are generally few and powerful (Miners, Oil companies and cartels etc).  When it comes to Stocks futures the commercials and many and varied so the playing field is more even, maybe even tipped towards the Financials.  Certainly this seemed to be the case during the 2007-09 credit crunch crash when the Net COT positions were heavily Bearish at the 2007 top and switched heavily Bullish at the early 2009 bottom (not shown on the chart below).  However since then things have been more mixed with Financials Net longs peaking early in the Bull trend as traders got nervous about the whole trend and everything seemed to hang on Central Bank policy perhaps?  Non Commercials were net evenly split between Bullish and Bearish at the Wave 1 (Purple) turn and were Max Bearish when the market went Bullish at Wave 2 (Purple) .  They did better at Wave 3 (Purple) being very Bearish but actually didn't max out net Bearish until the Wave B (Pink) point.  This is not that surprising as many people including myself, thought this was the end of the Bull.  The Commercials were almost still as Bearish when Wave 4 (Purple) turned Bullish, perhaps showing that the majority of the Non Commercial Professionals though this was the end.  Nice to know I was in such good company back then...

After that though it seems that euphoria overtook all market players and we began to hear why this time it would be different.  Economists came up with the concept of ZIRP and NIRP as the new normal.  MSM were awash with articles extolling the virtues of high dividend stocks and companies were borrowing heavily at low rates to fund M&A and share buy backs at crazy prices.  Non Comms were net max Bullish for the rally at wave 3 (pink) and again net max bullish at wave 5 (Purple) the recent Oct top, and I believe the All time high and end of the Bull.  It is this COT story, together will my well documented assessment (see other threads) leads me to believe the end has already come for the raging Central Bank Bull, a Bubble that will doubtless be the subject of many an academic thesis I am sure.

SPTRD-Weekly_221218COT.thumb.png.34ac514c4bf0f424eb72160b6132d6cf.png 

Link to comment

COT data can be very interesting and insightful. I believe it was brought to my attention by Community actually... possibly casey?

Anyway, the following on DailyFX I find very clear and may be interesting to some. https://www.dailyfx.com/forex/education/trading_tips/daily_trading_lesson/2018/12/12/the-predictive-power-of-the-cot-report.html

there is also a Podcast on it as below

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/trading-global-markets-decoded/id1440995971

Stitcher (to listen live in the web browser if you're at work or something): https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/trading-global-markets-decoded-with-dailyfx

Soundcloud also useful: https://soundcloud.com/user-943631370

Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/listen?u=0#/ps/Iuoq7v7xqjefyqthmypwp3x5aoi 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • In a world where gaming is one of the most used forms of relaxation, a good number of projects have evolved to give gamers an immersive experience alongside passive earning opportunities to earn from. Through time, there has been a plethora of crypto gaming projects. With AxieInfinity being its progenitor, we have witnessed expansive growth with how certain projects have extended its tentacles. Currently, one of the projects that has caught my eye is $NADA. The project is one of the pioneer gaming models on the Hedera Blockchain Network. Primarily, it seeks to be used in blockchain based NFT mobile games where the latter and metaverses are interconnected seamlessly. Most of the games it is associated with have considerable pedigree in the global market. In a bid to let users earn seamlessly, NADA looks to allow players earn tokens through game play thus projecting gamefi. In the exactitude of real world use-cases, the token can be used for purchasing in game items, et al. Deducing from all of its features, it is incredibly worthy to note that the token has good use cases and tokenomics. In recognition of this, reliable platforms like Bitget have expressed intent to list it along a significant number of activities to earn from, depositing the token is even opened on there already. Conclusively, I'll love to hear your thoughts on this new model? 
    • Blockchain and gaming complement each other nicely. Their fusion has enabled real rewards for gamers, something that traditional games don’t offer. What’s more, BlockchainxGaming effectively manages the ownership and transaction history of game characters, items, etc, enforces property rights, promotes transparency, stability, reliability and improves fun. As blockchain and NFT-based games continue to drive the game market's growth, the hunger to play more and earn more deepens. Nada Protocol is proposing a blockchain technology and ecosystem with customized structure that will fuse with the global mobile game market and NFT blockchain game market, satisfying game players’ cravings with a more immersive mobile game experience where they can own and trade the items they earn from the game. NADA focus seems to be centered around creating a fun blockchain gaming ecosystem that adds the value of economic activity to the pleasure of gameplay. One of the most significant of its core features is a buzzing marketplace where users can conveniently find the items they want and trade them with other users. Much of the activities in Nada marketplace is controlled by NADA token, a reward-type token built on the Hedera network, and currently building up liquidity to list on Bitget. What’s your thought on this fast-growing game and its chances to carve a niche for itself in the competitive gaming world?
    • Thanks very much, @KoketsoIG. I hadn't discovered the drop down menus - it all makes much more sense now! It's odd about the E1 contracts - it must be a new change, because I'm in the UK and I currently hold some of the E1 positions that I opened a few weeks ago. Anyway, at least now I understand what's going on. I'll try not to bother you with too many questions as I get used to the new platform! Best wishes, Cate
×
×
  • Create New...
us