Jump to content

Stochastics with Bollinger Bands

Recommended Posts

Saw this idea on a Youtube video.  I've been interested the concepts behind Bollinger Bands and Stochastics but didn't find them to be useful separately.

Do you think it's worth testing this strategy, using them together?

1) Sell when upper Bollinger is rejected and %K drops below %D from an overbought position

2) Buy when lower Bollinger is rejected and %K rises above %D from an oversold position

3) Sell when %K drops below %D on a bearish candle when the Bollinger Bands are narrow (breakout; does not require overbought)

4) Buy when %K rises above %D on a bullish candle when the Bollinger Bands are narrow (breakout; does not require oversold)


Link to comment

Put your stop above the previous high (where upper Bollinger Band was rejected) / previous low (where lower Bollinger Band was rejected) / beneath bullish/above bearish candle (when you are trading a breakout)

When placing your TP look for a 1:1.5 relative to the stop loss.


Edited by dmedin
Link to comment
46 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Looking much better with 200 EMA as a filter.  Still using stochastics as indicator of when to take a position :D 

yes, think of the ema as a slow oscillator and the stoch as a fast and so wait til they are lined up and going in the same direction, ema is the trend indicator and stoch is the trigger indicator.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
On 25/08/2020 at 12:26, dmedin said:

Per Tradingrush.com suggestion, only long when above 200 EMA and only short when below 200 EMA?  In which case, is the stochastic indicator redundant?


Does it mean that we shouldn't open BUY trade when the entry point is below 200ema and no SELL trade if above 200ema? Can you please calrify a bit more please?


Link to comment
2 hours ago, supshin08 said:

Does it mean that we shouldn't open BUY trade when the entry point is below 200ema and no SELL trade if above 200ema? Can you please calrify a bit more please?


Yes, you're right.

My original intention was to try and find a use for the Bollinger Bands. 

You know that there are two approaches, selling/buying bounces off the outer bands is one; selling/buying breakouts from narrow bands is another.

But if you just follow every signal the Bollinger Bands gives you, you'll lose a LOT of money.  Hence it needs a filter.

Some filters I've seen mentioned are using stochastics; waiting not just for a bounce but for a move back above/back below the 20 MA; determining the trend using a higher time frame; and using the 200 EMA.

They all need to be tested, tweaked, optimized to see which works best.

I'm kind of leaning into thinking BB isn't great for making trading decisions, but other people seem to be able to make use of it.

Edited by dmedin
Link to comment
  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Joined 25/09/23 22:13
  • Posts

    • The cryptocurrency industry has grown rapidly in recent years, with the total market capitalization now exceeding $500 billion. However, the industry still faces a number of challenges, including security and on-chain efficiency which is one of the biggest challenges in the cryptocurrency industry, because in recent years, there have been a number of high-profile hacks of cryptocurrency exchanges & wallets, and traders are faced with high cost of on-chain transactions. All of which summed up to make cryptocurrency trading less efficient. In order to address these issues, exchanges are seen taking up the responsibility of solving the problems and I've seen Bitget, a leading cryptocurrency derivatives exchange, recently partnering with Cobo, a leading provider of digital asset custody and security solutions. This partnership is aimed at enhancing the security and efficiency of cryptocurrency trading, which will allow users to seamlessly execute cross-exchange transactions, enabling users to capitalise on arbitrage opportunities without having to deposit their funds directly on exchanges. This could significantly reduce on-chain transaction gas costs and make crypto investments more efficient and cost-effective. Developments like this, if it could be capitalised on would take away bad players from the industry, make crypto a safe place and increase its adoption, but how wide would it cover for the whole users in the crypto space and even Bitcoin?
    • Stock Market Report S&P 500 - NASDAQ 100 - RUSSELL 2000 - DAX 40 - FTSE 100 - ASX 200. Elliott Wave Analysis Summary: Elliott Wave (iv) of  c) of 4 Flat Correction for US Indices and DAX. Trading Strategies: Once Wave (iv) has reached its 38.2% retracement level, short term traders can start to look for short trade setups into Wave (v) of c) of 4. The longer term Video Chapters 00:00 SP 500 (SPX)  11:01 NASDAQ (NDX) 12:39 Russell 2000 (RUT) 14:20 DAX 40 (DAX) 19:37 FTSE 100 UKX (UK100) 23:18 ASX 200 (XJO) 29:08 End Analyst Peter Mathers TradingLounge™ Australian Financial Services Licence - AFSL 317817 Source: tradinglounge    Access Trial    
    • I think bitget will be the obvious option cos binance that use to be a good option isn't finding it rosy atm with regulatory bodies and speculations around the health of the exchange aren't friendly to feel safe with them atm
  • Create New...