Jump to content

EA's


Guest EA-trader

Recommended Posts

Guest EA-trader

The trading industry is very good at marketing software, offering it to brokers, who in turn offer it to traders.This suits the brokerage model, in creating more spread income and more trading clients , but this model is not sustainable for the long term.The people who designed these gadgets, are not traders, they never made any money from trading , the industry carries on it's insanity of creating more analysis paralysis for traders. Already traders are bombarded with so much useless analysis, from over 50 indicators free on platforms(if these were any good ,why offer them for free,in any case one indicator does the job of 50 indicators).In the end ,we end up with more and more information, none of it used .

 

This is very much like IG offering a map to the trading gold, in the trading gold rush, but if you knew where the gold is , you would not be selling or giving this map of technical analysis for free.

 

The gold for IG and it's clients,in the future,is automated analysis tools and expert advisors , that software to use the automated analysis, which is executed by clients at I G.

 

The software is EAS or expert  advisors, eas can be programmed with indicators (another analysis tools), they can be programmed with japanese candlesticks patterns and price action settings.The expert advisors will automatically use the analysis of price action, candlesticks and indicators, all this analysis is already available,

 

IG should really look at providing about 20 expert advisors free to their clients, the clients just have to load them on their mt4 platforms, and start generating spread income , and if the designers of the eas are any good ,the clients are likely to benefit..

 

The industry is good at selling books ,software, maps and doing the same thing ,over and over again,expecting different results.Your intentions are good, but will your clients use your new analysis? Are you not just re-inventing the wheel?

 

Here is an example chart of all the analysis, a trader needs to look at support,resistance,trend lines,channels ,candlesticks  and an indicator.In fact I can even desig an indicator, it reads price action and tells the client ,it is high probability.

 

The second image ,with the bottom indicator, is reading price action, it is a price action indicator.I only use custom indicators (indicators made specially for me by me).The trend lines channel indicator, is also a custom indicator.These analysis tools are already giving me enough information ,to trade.

 

Buy them ,give them to all your clients, see the results.CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCIGPA.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Guest EA-trader

This is a real live example of automated trend scalper.It places trades,based on price action analysis and indicators, these are programmed into the EA.The Ea scalps with the trend.All a trader does,is load the EA and it trades for me.

 

 

automated.jpgautomatedprofits.jpg

 

The EA uses automated analysis and does everything automatically ,places the trades  and even requests funds withdrawal,like an ATM ea

 

 

.ATM.jpg

Link to comment
Guest EA-trader

It depends on what criteria of past information ,you use.I tend to use current strength of  instrument, rather than call it past..I look no longer than 7 to 60 days, but mainly today's present set up.

Link to comment
Guest Bemused

I'm using the MT4 platform to trade through IG and I have a few automated algo's trading the US30 futures. A few of the EAs have similar entry triggers and I've started noticing that I'm getting hit at very different entry points across these EAs. For example, 2 EAs will enter a trade but they will trigger 2-3 sec apart. There are no errors in the executing, simply triggering a trade 2-3 secs apart when they should be equal. The differences are well beyond the standard of error i expect.

 

Does anyone have an idea why this is the case?

 

 

Also, can anyone explain why the demo data offers significantly different outcomes to the live data feed. The differences are immediate as per the last 24hrs of historical data. I'll run last nights trades through the demo account and the differences are so extreme the results are rendered useless.

Link to comment
Guest Bemused

They've actually sent the signals 2 & 3 secs apart when technically on this setup they should have been identical.

 

Which is strange because the formula and code are identical and there are no errors recorded. They simply traded apart.

 

Could the pricing feed from IG have latency issues across different charts within MT4?

 

I have been hit at the same time previously and both EAs traded in and out as expected.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      23,068
    • Total Posts
      95,500
    • Total Members
      43,686
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Mac
    Joined 04/10/23 03:34
  • Posts

    • Introduction: Following the demise of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) landscape underwent a significant transformation that raised questions about the legitimacy and security of such platforms. As a result, consumers are now demanding greater transparency and protective measures from exchanges to regain their faith. The post-FTX CEX landscape is examined in this paper, with a focus on significant exchanges' actions while also noting important trends. After FTX failed, consumers demanded more openness from CEX, which brought credibility once again into the spotlight. Proof of Reserves (PoR) gained popularity as exchanges tried to convince users that their assets were secure. Although PoR by itself does not ensure solvency, Bitget, OKX, Binance, and other CEX were forced to adopt this approach. Additionally, it became crucial to provide protection funds to give users trust, especially in the event of losses or breaches. Binance upped its protection funds from $735 million to $1 billion, underscoring their dedication to protecting user funds, while Bitget expanded their fund from $200 million to over $300 million. Bitget Shines in the CEX Landscape: Bitget distinguished itself by growing its derivatives volume at the time of FTX's collapse, showing resilience in a challenging market. This exchange's ability to adapt and thrive post-FTX demonstrates its strength in the CEX landscape. Binance retained its dominance, maintaining stable trading volumes despite the FTX fallout, but still faced with regulatory challenges in some regions, forcing it to close its services there. Other exchanges, like OKX, also managed to maintain strong derivatives businesses. However, there was a slight decrease in spot trading volume, with DEX trading remaining relatively stable.   Trends, Legal Landscape, and the Road Ahead:  Most CEXs experienced a decline in derivatives trading volume post-FTX, except for Bitget, which increased its trading volume slightly. This growth highlights Bitget's ability to capture additional volume in a challenging environment. Regulatory challenges, especially in the US, pose significant hurdles for CEXs. Compliance with KYC and AML measures is important, as inadequate safeguards can harm an exchange's reputation. CEXs that actively contribute to the ecosystem gain favour and trust from users. In conclusion, as successful exchanges will continue to adapt, innovate, and prioritize user trust in this evolving and competitive cryptocurrency landscape, which exchange do you think will stand out strong in the coming years? https://research.nansen.ai/articles/decoding-the-cex-landscape-an-in-depth-analysis-of-2023-h1
    • Kinda like the features of this product, it’s quite easy to navigate through and has less complexities. This should be every traders flex 
    • Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge Daily Chart, 4 October 23, NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD) NEOUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Double Corrective Position: Wave (Y) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave ((B)) of Flat Wave Cancel invalid Level: 5.96 Details: The corrective of wave (Y) Likely move down to 5.94 NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Trading Strategy: A decline below 7.08 makes the triangle complete at 7.68, also the price below the MA200 Line, Overview still is a downtrend, and the price move to wave ((5)) which a last wave before change a trend NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is below the MA200 indicating a downtrend, RSI is a Bearish divergence. TradingLounge Analyst: Kittiampon Somboonsod, CEWA Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here! Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge 4H Chart, 4 October 23, NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD) NEOUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Triangle Position: Wave (E) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave (4) of Impulse Wave Cancel invalid Level: Details: Weve 4 may be complete and the ptice decline again in wave 5 NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Trading Strategy: A decline below 7.08 makes the triangle complete at 7.68, also the price below the MA200 Line, Overview still is a downtrend, and the price move to wave ((5)) which a last wave before change a trend NEO/U.S. dollar(NEOUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is below the MA200 indicating a downtrend, RSI is a Bearish divergence
×
×
  • Create New...
us