Jump to content

Screening for Institutional Buying


Recommended Posts

I saw this article sometime ago (published June 2017) and thought to keep it to check on the progress of the recommendations. They came from a set of screener parameters designed to identify institutional buying of company stock.

Below are the charts to date of the companies recommended by the screener 1 year ago (June 2017). See link for screener specifics.

https://www.nasdaq.com/article/how-to-uncover-institutional-buying-cm806030

2086577050_JohnsonJohnson(AllSessions)_20180702_12_19.thumb.png.ea5b5905d5a2fb925c46169849ed433f.png448601207_NantKwestInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.394e9127ab3af8152b810f94b1f888dd.png979602540_DelekUSHoldingsInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.7c7fe7712aae88257719a970d74c588c.png2084426418_AbbottLaboratories_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.8502081cbcb0bad478eecfe18446f336.png436349077_WinnebagoIndustriesInc_20180702_12_20.thumb.png.38abed7199573797b185898ab64e28c0.png

Link to comment

so the parameters are

• Current Price greater than Price from 1 Week Ago
• Price from 1 Week Ago greater than Price from 2 Weeks Ago
• Price from 2 Week Ago greater than Price from 3 Weeks Ago

• Weekly Volume greater than Weekly Volume from 1 Week Ago
• Weekly Volume from 1 Wk Ago greater than Weekly Volume from 2 Wks Ago
• Weekly Volume from 2 Wks Ago greater than Weekly Volume from 3 Wks Ago

• Zacks Rank less than or equal to 3
• Price greater than or equal to $5
• Average 20-day Volume greater than or equal to 100,000 shares

Is there an easy method to look at these things? How do you do it? Charts seem to show varying degrees of success. Do you think the method works?

Link to comment

Hi @247trader,  the results are very good, 4 of the 5 had 6 months of gains from the June start date and 2 of those 4 the gains continue to date while the other 1 of the 5 had a ballistic 1 month gain before collapsing.

The top 6 on the screener list can be gleaned from a chart, the Zack's Rank is not so important (from article), don't include low priced stock (7) and the last one can be done roughly as it's just there to ensure sufficient liquidity to be able to get in and out.

I thought it looked relatively simple and performed very well over the sample of 5 picked stocks. Coupled with a moving average trailing stop all 5 would have made good gains.

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • It is obvious that the crypto market is majorly manipulated by whales, they decide bull or bear. Imagine after reading charts but the market fails to obey the structure. This mostly affect traders’ self-esteem and get frustrated. Few months ago, I took SMC classes since I was told it has over 85% accuracy but my first trial was frustrating. Anyway, with consistency and determination I am getting better. Newbies are always on the wrong side of this manipulation and what you keep hearing from influencers is DYOR. I wonder if after researching your trade went your way.   Many enthusiasts have now shifted their focus to airdrop hunting which is time -consuming and unreliable sometime. Sometime, I wonder if financial inclusion and decentralization are achievable. How do you guys keep up with all this negative vice in this industry and still make any dime from trading?
    • NEAR Protocol has launched a significant upgrade, known as "Nightshade 2.0," on its main network. This update is aimed at enhancing the scalability and usability of the blockchain, marking a notable step forward in NEAR's development. Introduction of Stateless Validation One of the standout features of this upgrade is "stateless validation," a concept that has been widely discussed by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. The NEAR Foundation, which supports the blockchain, highlighted this feature in a recent press release. Stateless validation allows NEAR validators to operate without maintaining the state of a shard locally, significantly improving the efficiency and scalability of the network. NEAR's Position in the Crypto World Despite ranking as the 25th largest blockchain by DeFiLlama, NEAR Protocol remains a focal point in crypto tech circles. This attention is partly due to the credentials of its founder, Illia Polosukhin, who was a top engineer at Google, specializing in AI systems, before venturing into blockchain technology.  A Core Component of NEAR's Evolution The Nightshade 2.0 upgrade is integral to NEAR's ongoing efforts to incorporate "sharding" into its core design. Sharding involves splitting the blockchain into smaller, more manageable pieces, enabling the network to process more transactions at a lower cost. Ethereum, a prominent blockchain, has its own roadmap for sharding and recently implemented proto-danksharding, the first iteration of this concept. With the new upgrade, NEAR's sharding implementation will enhance the network's transaction throughput by five times. According to Bowen Wang, the head of protocol at NEAR, this upgrade also reduces the cost of operating validators, making it easier for more people to participate in network validation and thus improving the network's decentralization. A Milestone in NEAR's Development Nightshade has been a part of NEAR's roadmap for years, with its first version introduced in 2022. The original concept was outlined in a white paper published by Polosukhin in 2019. Nightshade 2.0 represents a fundamental reworking of NEAR's sharding approach and is a significant milestone in the protocol's evolution. Current Market Performance At the time of writing, NEAR Protocol (NEAR) was trading at $3.87, reflecting a 3.57% increase over the last 24 hours. This uptick in price is likely a response to the successful deployment of the Nightshade 2.0 upgrade, signaling growing confidence in NEAR's future prospects.
    • Do you mean daily check-in the app could earn me 1 SOL? please how do i participate?
×
×
  • Create New...
us