Jump to content
  • 0

Microfocus shares

Question

Hi,

I would like to know why my 12 Microfocus shares were sold, then 9 were purchased. The Proceeds from the automated sale have not appeared in my account, not withstanding it was not initiated by myself nor was I informed that this might happen.

I am seeing a discrepancy between what I expect to have lost and what I have lost. The share price has dipped 4.9% since I purchased the shares, I have however lost about 32%.

From an initial purchase totaling £232 at 1858.76 = 12, i now have 9 shares at 1770, the proceeds of the 3 shares at 1770 (£53 or thereabouts) depending on the 30th of April enforced sale price should be in my account should they not?

Can you let me know what has happened here? I know they performed a buy back or something like that, however my expectation here is not that I should lose around ~£70 or so of investment as a result of their activity.

 

Kind regards,

Matt

shares.png

Trades.png

Share this post


Link to post

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Micro Focus has recently undergone a stock consolidation (a corporate action) in the underlying market which we have reflected on your account. 

Depending on your line (US or UK) the following should apply. 

image.png

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Guest Potential New Customer

Out of interest, what sort of notifications do customers receive about pending corporate actions?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
3 hours ago, JamesIG said:

Micro Focus has recently undergone a stock consolidation (a corporate action) in the underlying market which we have reflected on your account. 

Depending on your line (US or UK) the following should apply. 

image.png

Hi JamesIG,

Thanks, relatively new to this and especially new to this behaviour. It never hurts to ask, right.

Understood that the consolidation reflects the incorporation of another into the base, effectively dilution of the stock I guess. Because they've had a decent run of late they, MF, took this opportunity to rebase... Cool, best to learn this stuff with a pinch of skin in the game or you never learn.

Thank you for taking the time to answer.

All the best,

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
12 hours ago, Matt_Stocker said:

Hi JamesIG,

Thanks, relatively new to this and especially new to this behaviour. It never hurts to ask, right.

Understood that the consolidation reflects the incorporation of another into the base, effectively dilution of the stock I guess. Because they've had a decent run of late they, MF, took this opportunity to rebase... Cool, best to learn this stuff with a pinch of skin in the game or you never learn.

Absolutely @Matt_Stocker - the whole purpose of Community is to offer that transparent open space to all clients (and guests!) who have questions. No one can know everything, especially given the number of markets we offer and the multitude of different dealing and trading functionalities and strategies, so its always best to put your questions to the forum. :) Happy trading - shout if we can ever help further. 

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,251
    • Total Posts
      35,940
    • Total Members
      45,954
    Newest Member
    Joe86
    Joined 20/08/19 01:38
  • Posts

    • Hi greetings from Singapore & finally someone started a thread on HSI.   😗
    • I am not so advanced like Mercury here but I could at least understand half of what he is talking about. Yes it did trigger me to consider the possibility of the bullish trend pushing price to 30000 levels.
    • Ah! The $64 million (billion, trillion) question! Where's the inflation? I'm afraid I can only offer my own thoughts on that....there are far better qualified people to be had elsewhere. Here are my personal thoughts/threads however.. QE was used (expanded the Fed balance sheet) to purchase US Treasury debt. Elsewhere same reason. It was intended that it would be rolled over as it matured and sold back to the market. Now there's doubt about that or at least some of it. It could just disappear. You're effectively buying your own debt...nice game, nice game....and if you can do that (with one hand on the money press) then you want it as cheaply as possible. If you're effectively the only buyer, you own the market and that itself drives yields lower. Wash,rinse,spin. Throw in some safe haven moments and you get to where we are today. Throughout the whole of the experiment, and that's what it is because no-one knows how this ends (although I expect badly) it became clear that the elites are getting richer...they were the ones with the assets after all. For assets include everything...stocks, property, antiques, paintings, wine etc. Everything Trump has in other words!. Their pay (board level) also got a huge boost in my opinion from performance related share prices due to unprecedented share buy backs - this is on going because credit has never been so cheap. Your pay almost certainly didn't increase. In fact in real terms it went backwards. Lots of studies support that thesis both in US/UK/Europe. The policy is now driving rates well below zero. Just when you thought rates can only go up from here (2016 low) they actually went lower and bonds were and still are the place to be! Wish I had bought Reagan's long term debt. I think this will continue and it links in with my thoughts about Japan the past two decades. Keeping rates below inflation (and they all do) effectively forces you to do your consumer bit and that was the justification/hope/smoke screen, take your pick!. We'll grow our way out of it - scenario 2 a few posts back. The wealth divide is a real concern now and they know it. In consumer led economies, if the consumer had access to that increased money supply and provides it with some velocity (i.e. gets it moving around the economy) THEN you get inflation. You don't have access to it.........yet. Assets are being held up by funny money. Any whiff the central banks (i.e who now ARE the market) will dial back causes immediate stock market roll overs. Draw your own conclusions. The other thought is simply this. Think of deflation as air leaving your tyre. You're pumping like mad to get it back in but however hard you try the tyre is getting flatter! The hole's too big. Deflation wins.....or if you manage to stabilise the pressure then stagnant growth at best. Possibly stagflation 70s style. Get the plaster on and whey, hey! Hyperinflation here we come. Hold gold. Just my penny worth!...and apologies for the length.
×
×