Jump to content

Portfolio/stock picker's leaderboard


Recommended Posts

I think it would be beneficial for everyone, including IG, if there was a facility that showed members what stocks were included in the best performing portfolios, members of IG had. Obviously the member A/c details would need to remain confidential, though.

Link to post

E.g. my A/c's been going gang busters lately because I've had the following stocks: Microsoft, CSL, Mesoblast, Nasdaq 100 ETF, Afterpay, Alkane Resources, Nissan Motors (short), Royal Dutch Shell B (short)

Others could benefit and I could benefit from other's good runs, too

  • Like 1
Link to post

not at the mo. not got that far advanced in my trading, yet. My current strategy is working so well, though, I don't think I'm missing much.

But I'm always learning, as it's necessary for constant improvement. And don't we need to be constantly improving in the tight world of trading?

So, tell me, how/what screeners do you use?

Link to post
1 minute ago, SAMMYDAVID said:

not at the mo. not got that far advanced in my trading, yet. My current strategy is working so well, though, I don't think I'm missing much.

But I'm always learning, as it's necessary for constant improvement. And don't we need to be constantly improving in the tight world of trading?

So, tell me, how/what screeners do you use?

you've hit a great patch in the market cycle for longing big stocks, after the up and down of the last 2 years the market finally took off around Oct last year and has been pretty much one way since.

I don't usually trade individual stocks myself preferring instead the indices so I don't use screeners but there are many on  the forum who do and are interested in which ones are best and what parameters to set.

Link to post

Sure. Note that I also short stocks and am making money on two: Nissan Motor and Royal Dutch Shell B.

Whilst the market may be going through a good patch, my stock selection process may be the key. For most trades - stocks, indices, FX, ETFs and so on, there are only a few I trade, that pass my selection process. By following the stategy, I'm winning. The strategy would probably still be the same in a bear market.

I'm talking about what may be the Holy Grail - picking trades that are moving in to profit, and knowing where to place the stop. Having such a strategy that follows the money, but cuts out quick when the trade becomes indecisive, is probably the dream most traders pursue.

If you look at the other trades I mentioned, you'll see they've been on a good profit run: Microsoft, Betashare Nasdaq 100 ETF, Afterpay, Mesoblast ASX (although I've recently exited), Alkane Resources, CSL, and more.

Link to post
4 minutes ago, SAMMYDAVID said:

Sure. Note that I also short stocks and am making money on two: Nissan Motor and Royal Dutch Shell B.

Whilst the market may be going through a good patch, my stock selection process may be the key. For most trades - stocks, indices, FX, ETFs and so on, there are only a few I trade, that pass my selection process. By following the stategy, I'm winning. The strategy would probably still be the same in a bear market.

I'm talking about what may be the Holy Grail - picking trades that are moving in to profit, and knowing where to place the stop. Having such a strategy that follows the money, but cuts out quick when the trade becomes indecisive, is probably the dream most traders pursue.

If you look at the other trades I mentioned, you'll see they've been on a good profit run: Microsoft, Betashare Nasdaq 100 ETF, Afterpay, Mesoblast ASX (although I've recently exited), Alkane Resources, CSL, and more.

That sounds like good commonsense basic trading, looking for stocks that are on the move, entering with a good stop and looking to run as far as possible but getting out early if things become indecisive. Most trading books will recommend the same. Hope it keeps going well for you.

Link to post

Yes, thanks, Caseynotes. You're correct that I look for trending trades and ride them as long as possible. It's necessary to overcome the losses.

I'm not sure that screeners can narrow down completely, what I look for, but screeners may be a good starting point. What's also key  is having a stop strategy that's neither too close, nor too wide.

  • Like 1
Link to post
5 hours ago, SAMMYDAVID said:

I'm talking about what may be the Holy Grail - picking trades that are moving in to profit, and knowing where to place the stop. Having such a strategy that follows the money, but cuts out quick when the trade becomes indecisive, is probably the dream most traders pursue.

 

And what you'll find is that is an infuriating way to trade stocks because you will inevitably get stopped out by price spikes, situations where the price drops to a ridiculous low (or gaps low) before immediately turning again. 

As a bare minimum you should only trade individual stocks using a futures contract and have an extremely loose and distant stop.  Don't bother shorting any big-cap stocks.  Buy call options if you can.  But best of all buy real shares so you can get dividends too.  Buy and hold is the only method that has any realistic chance of success with stocks.

Edited by dmedin
Link to post

It would be infuriating, but not for me, because I have a system that trades stocks unlikely to chop through their underlying MA. So, I ride the moment but have a close stop. Sorry, but it works! As mentioned, if you look at the recent charts of the stocks I highlighted, you'll see this to be true. Yesterday I was stopped out of Microsoft and collected about 140% profit after about 4 days (using CFDs). That's not infuriating. I'm also currently sitting on 500% profit on CSL after about 3 weeks.

Don't short stocks, you say? I'm currently sitting on 60% profit shorting Nissan Motor over two weeks, and 20% profit shorting Royal Dutch Shell B over one week!

What your saying about being stopped out would be correct if any old stock pick was used, but not for the stock picking strategy I use. And not when using CFDs, which supercharge short-term profit taking.

I wouldn't get anywhere near these same % returns on vanilla shares.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      14,313
    • Total Posts
      70,761
    • Total Members
      59,342
    • Most Online
      5,137
      14/01/21 09:51

    Newest Member
    Valiant77
    Joined 01/03/21 10:44
  • Posts

    • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS - Great Barrington Declaration (gbdeclaration.org)
    • Hah, can't believe they censored out the word d@mn.    
    • Interesting chart of Scandinavian all-cause deaths in 24 month periods shows no covid effect at all. The winter of 2019/20 was mild with fewer seasonal deaths than ususal but then the novel coronavirus was released and the deaths that would have occured during winter occured in April instead.  This is why so many countries are showing no real increase in all-cause deaths per year. It also shows that the covid death numbers are fake and are rebranded deaths from other causes. The vast majority of people who catch covid have mild or no symptoms at all, for those with symptoms the infectous stage only lasts 10 days max. From then on you have natural immunity. If you've had SARS-CoV-2 anytime over the last 17 years you will have T-cell immunity, if you have been in contact with covid-2 this last year you will also have covid-2 antibody immunity. Push the myth that covid can be spread asymptomatcally, mass test asymptomatic people with a test that is designed to detect old dead viral RNA that their immune system has destroyed and when the test shows positive pretend they actually have covid. We are constantly in contact with viral material, with an effective immune system we deal with it and don't get sick. Testing people who are not sick you will find old viral material if they came in contact with the virus up to a month previously, same if you apply the test to someone who has died.  Counting these people as covid 'Cases/Deaths' is a fraud and is done to boost the numbers and perpetuate the climate of fear. No return of freedom for you until you're begging for health identity cards, oh - and may as well add finance and energy usage details while we're at it.   .      
×
×
  • Create New...