Jump to content
  • 0

Margin requirements


gatehill

Question

I currently have two spread bets on individual shares, both with guaranteed stops.

The sum of the current loss on them plus the margin is below my total funds so I am being asked to top up my account  even though the guaranteed stops are well covered by the cash in my account.

I don't understand this - can somebody please explain?

Link to comment

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
17 hours ago, gatehill said:

I currently have two spread bets on individual shares, both with guaranteed stops.

The sum of the current loss on them plus the margin is below my total funds so I am being asked to top up my account  even though the guaranteed stops are well covered by the cash in my account.

I don't understand this - can somebody please explain?

Hi, this has come up before and if I remember correctly the reply was that when the new margin regulations from ESMA came out in early 2018 brokers originally thought as you but when they sought clarification from ESMA the regulator ruled that only market stop orders could be used for the margin calculation not a brokers guarantee stop. 

Link to comment
  • 0

Thanks for your response, Caseynotes; so what's the difference between "market stop orders" and "brokers' guarantee stops" as far as the average punter like me is concerned? After all, surely my contract is with the broker so if they are offering a guaranteed stop, is that not legally binding?

Link to comment
  • 0
16 minutes ago, gatehill said:

Thanks for your response, Caseynotes; so what's the difference between "market stop orders" and "brokers' guarantee stops" as far as the average punter like me is concerned? After all, surely my contract is with the broker so if they are offering a guaranteed stop, is that not legally binding?

a market order sits in the market while a guaranteed stop is a broker guarantee. Any order that sits in the market can be jumped over (slippage). I would think the guaranteed stop is legally binding but couldn't say what would happen if a broker went bust after a black swan event.

That's one of the main reasons I stick with IG, they have a long track record of surviving black swan events, many brokers don't, some very big ones have fallen very suddenly.

Recently someone wrote on the forum how different brokers operate and how the good ones don't take the other side of a punters bet but rather match A book to B book and then hedge the rest. They correctly sited the broker Plus 500 who recently had a major profits drop due to their punters 'getting it right' in the recent oil turmoil. You really don't want to be with a broker like that, doesn't matter how 'cheap' they might seem, ultra low spreads or whatever.  

Link to comment
  • 0
8 hours ago, gatehill said:

Thanks, again, for your response. I'm not inclined to add funds (the minimum on line is £250, but I believe you can add less over the phone.

not sure about the phone, I think the min is more to do with using a card. same for withdrawals to a card, but if you have an established link to your bank account there doesn't seem to be a minimum withdrawal amount.

Link to comment
  • 0

Via the bank could well be less, but it says it takes up to three days, which I find surprising. Cards and PayPal its £250 minimum, but when this arose some months ago, I'm fairly certain they told me it could be less over the phone. However, as my shortfall is under £20 at present, I shall ignore it and trust the market (and my positions) turn more positive shortly!

I appreciate your input over the last few days. Looking at the some of the rest of the forum, there is a lot to learn, and you have obviously helped a lot of people!

Link to comment
  • 0
3 hours ago, gatehill said:

Via the bank could well be less, but it says it takes up to three days, which I find surprising. Cards and PayPal its £250 minimum, but when this arose some months ago, I'm fairly certain they told me it could be less over the phone. However, as my shortfall is under £20 at present, I shall ignore it and trust the market (and my positions) turn more positive shortly!

I appreciate your input over the last few days. Looking at the some of the rest of the forum, there is a lot to learn, and you have obviously helped a lot of people!

I always withdraw to my bank account and though it says up to three days it always seems to be a near instant transaction, I've certainly never noticed any delay. There may be a delay on the first occurrence for security checks or if the transfer is international. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Silver Elliott Wave Analysis Function -Counter-Trend Mode - Corrective Structure -Double Zigzag for wave B (circled) Position - Wave (Y) of B Direction - Wave (Y) of B is still in play Details - After violating the last update, we have a new outlook on daily and H4 that better fits the current price action. A lower extension is now expected for Silver. Silver Elliott Wave Analysis: Extended Decline and Bullish Outlook Overview: The decline in Silver that began on May 20th is continuing to extend lower and is expected to persist before finding significant support. Despite this downturn, the year-long trend remains bullish and is anticipated to resume once this corrective phase concludes. The emerging chart pattern suggests a further decline towards $27 in the coming days or weeks.   Daily Chart Analysis: Two key observations can be made on the daily chart: Bullish Yearly Trend: The trend for this year has been bullish, leading to a breakout from a prior 13-month sideways price action. This indicates strong underlying bullish momentum. Corrective Decline: The current decline from April 19th, 2024, is identified as corrective. Therefore, the expectation is that the bullish trend will resume once this corrective structure concludes.   To determine when the corrective structure will finish, it’s important to identify the emerging pattern. Early analysis suggests that the price might be forming a double zigzag Elliott wave corrective structure, labeled as waves (W)-(X)-(Y). Wave (W) and wave (X) completed on June 13th and June 21st, respectively. The price is now breaking down in wave (Y), which could extend to $27 or lower. Meanwhile, the year-long impulse is labeled as wave A (circled) in the primary degree, and the double zigzag pullback should complete the corresponding primary degree wave B (circled). Following this, wave (C) is expected to push the price to a fresh 2024 high.   H4 Chart Analysis: The H4 chart provides a detailed view of the sub-waves within the double zigzag structure. The price is currently in wave A of (Y), which is expected to be followed by a minor corrective bounce for wave B. Afterward, the price should continue lower for wave C, completing wave (Y) of B (circled). This pattern aligns with the broader expectation of a corrective phase before the resumption of the bullish trend.   Summary: Current Decline: Silver’s decline from May 20th is expected to continue towards $27 before finding support. Bullish Yearly Trend: Despite the current downturn, the overall trend for the year remains bullish. Corrective Structure: The decline is forming a double zigzag Elliott wave corrective structure. Daily Chart Insight: The trend is expected to resume higher after the completion of the current wave B. H4 Chart Detail: Sub-waves show a minor bounce expected before a further decline to complete wave (Y) of B. In conclusion, while Silver is currently experiencing a corrective decline, the long-term bullish trend is anticipated to resume once this phase concludes. Traders should watch for a potential bottom around $27 and prepare for a renewed bullish impulse towards new highs in 2024. Technical Analyst : Sanmi Adeagbo Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!  
    • Honestly, L2 scaling solution projects are now increasing by the day. Should we worry about that? Absolutely, not. Why? Because it reduce overdependence on one solution and increase adoption. Also, focusing on different aspect of scaling is a good thing; for instance, Blast focus on staking ETH and stablecoin reinforces security on their network and Ethereum mainnet which increases users' confidence in blockchain and crypto.
    • Well, price performances are always a reflection of either of 2 factors: 1. constant hype by influencers/KOLs 2. whale trading activities 3. imrovement of tech or expansion of utility/usecase to accommodate needs of users For BGB, I think it's rather the last 2 basically from the recent expansion of its ecosystem where the token is used for several high-end events like launchpad, poolx etc.
×
×
  • Create New...
us