Jump to content

Realistic minimum investment scenario - frustrating reality of a small investor


Recommended Posts

With ever changing limits, fees and other artificial obstacles, the share dealing for a small investor on IG platform is becoming increasingly frustrating experience. Can I just ask the IG support and also regular experienced (small) investors, what is the realistic and practical monthly investment that’s even close to viable?

- There’s a quarterly £24 custody fee. In order to a avoid it, you have to do 3+ share dealings in the last 3 months, costing you £24-30, depending on the market. OK, so you basically pay £24+ initially no matter what.
- There’s $0/£3/€10 per deal afterwards, so unless you’re dealing exclusively in US stocks, you’re realistically looking at another £6-€20 per month to avoid higher commission rates - to avoid (understand decrease) the quarterly custody fee.
- Then there’s the lovely “minimum 90 consideration” rule, not very clearly advertised until you try to execute order. Designed to avoid losing money due to all of the above (fair enough), each share dealing has to be above this level.

So to summarise:
- In order to avoid the custody fee, I need to invest roughly £270 every three months (£90 minimum a month), costing me £24 minimum (£8 a month) in the process.
- If I decide to invest in UK, to avoid higher commission rates, I need further 2 share deals a month (at £90 each), costing me another £6. £186 per month, £558 total over a quarter.
- So that’s £294 + £558 = £852 a quarter expenses for £810 investment - minimum to keep the fees at lowest.
- After this initial period, I’ll need £270+£9 each month, £837 a quarter expenses for £810 investment.

Even at maximum optimisation, my investment needs to grow roughly 5% in first 3 months (3% thereafter) just to break even. And that’s after that initial consideration, I have to find those £852 to invest in the first place. Because at the minimum £270 invested just to “avoid” custody fee, the growth would have to be closer to 10%.

Unless I invest exclusively in US stocks, or invest 2x-3x that amount regularly, this is borderline unwise.

Is that a gist of it? The famous IG of today?

Link to comment
Some comments:
 
* £24 per quarter is competitive (ii charge £9.99 per month and also give rebates if you trade)
 
* buying £90 of equity at a time is much too small
 
* if you can find an ETF or IT with similar ideas to your own you can make one annual investment rather than twelve small ones
 
* consider some sort of equity based regular savings plan (not sure if IG offer this)
 
* you may be able to get better value for yourself by using spread betting or CFD (though they come with problems of their own). Try out a Demo account and if you then use a Live account, start with markets offering a Guaranteed Stop.

 
Link to comment

To be honest, if you look around some of the other paid brokers, you'll find IG is probably one of the cheapest out there in terms of both commissions and custody charges. It might be worth having a look at some of the free providers to see if they might be a better fit - I had a brief look around recently and Freetrade looked interesting (though I haven't actually tried it, so I can't comment on whether it is any good or not).

Link to comment

Competitive it might be, yet it can still be way too high.

I understand there are ways around it

- either invest more (I’d love to, but not a realistic proposal these days I’m afraid)
- or invest less often in larger chunks (yet still pay custody fees in the meantime, plus still the money problem)
- or consider ETFs and Smart Portfolio (yes, doing that, but I just want to own some stock outright)
- or use CFDs (great if you have time to be on it, which is not realistic long term)

Yet unfortunately none of that covers the scenario, where I’d like to make a gradual and long term investment into particular stock(s), own it outright and not haemorrhage money in fees in the process.

Sorry for the rant, it’s just frustrating. This business needs heavy disruptors, it left non institutional investors long behind. I’m just trying to justify paying for the platform slowly but surely realising that it brings me no benefits whatsoever, apart from reasonably useful (and finally 21st century) GUI.

Link to comment

If you are looking for lower cost to trading / investing and unhappy with IG, then you should probably look elsewhere. There are some providers out there who offer commission free trading (albeit with monthly account keeping fees) and can offer fractional shares - these may be more suitable for your requirements. 

IG (and all brokers for that matter) are a volume based business and need their account holders to be active to maintain their accounts / platform - they still need to keep the lights on, even when nobody is there.... 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • What’s the average spread like, generally? How does it compare to current conditions? I’ve been using IG for over a decade, and I’ve noticed a growing sense of dissatisfaction, not just from myself but across various forums too. I think they really need to prioritize some core areas—like improving the iOS app and refining the API. While your issue may not be directly tied to the API, in theory, if you know how to use it well, it should offer a better experience compared to the web platform or the standard retail charts. Just my two cents. As for the problem, it’s definitely not about liquidity in these markets. I’d say it’s more likely due to the rise of algorithmic trading over the years. These high-speed algorithms can take advantage of price movements, often leading to short periods of slippage for regular traders as prices shift rapidly. Market orders, meant to execute quickly at the best available price, are more prone to slippage compared to limit orders. Since market orders prioritize speed, they don’t guarantee a specific price. If the market price changes in the short moment between when you place the order and when it's actually executed, your trade will go through at the new price, whether it’s better or worse than expected. This makes market orders riskier in fast-moving or volatile markets. By using the API along with a low-latency server, you can reduce the risk of slippage in some cases. What kind of latency are you experiencing with the API? Avoid using a home connection for this—opt for an affordable VPS, even a $5 one will significantly improve your experience.
    • Cardano’s 3.8% price surge might be from all the updates and partnerships they’ve been rolling out lately. I’ve noticed that every time they release some big news, like a new upgrade or collaboration, there’s always a jump in price. The community around Cardano is really strong too, which seems to play a role in driving things. A few weeks back, I swapped some tokens using https://stealthex.io , and I remember seeing a bunch of people talking about Cardano on forums. Maybe that hype is finally showing in the price. Either way, it’s nice to see some action in the market again.
    • Hi everyone, just a short post at this stage as I want to see if there is any interest in this topic first.  I’ll likely contact IG but wanted to see if there are other thoughts and experiences first as there are several issues I am seeing and it’s a bit complicated, so didn’t want to write some long rambling post. i trade the Dax and Nasdaq indices and use an automated strategy using the API.  I am effectively trying to do a trend trading strategy but on short timescales.  So i set fairly tight stops and then run those trades that leave the area to the plus side.  My win rate is low so have a lot of losers so slippage on stops is quite important to me. i have a database of trades and 5m data going back over 3years now - so have a lot of data to work with. i measured the stop slippage several years ago and it was fine for this method but have re measured it recently as I noticed the losing trades were a bit too large and it seems that the slippage has increased quite a lot for Nasdaq (not then Dax). I am trying to see what is behind this. Anyone interested or tackling similar issues? Thanks David 
×
×
  • Create New...
us