Jump to content

Initial Public Offerings


Recommended Posts

Hi Dsou

voila! https://www.ig.com/uk/investments/share-dealing/ipos


although there is a lot of evidence that buying in the primary market is not always the wisest idea. Great if you want to get in early on a specific stock but otherwise you can always buy on the first day of trading on the secondary market, eg FOOT recently IPO'd and you can pretty much still buy those at the price they IPO. Additionally, you may not get a full allocation on the IPO - this notably happened at RMG which led to scaled down allocations largely because of the widespread publicity. Again, this last week almost sunk to IPO levels.


If you wait you can allow the market to determine the fair price (look at Snap chat - below)


and unless you are adept at reading listing Prospectuses then buying into IPO can be risky.


How does that help?

Link to comment

Here is an example of a recent IPO that has gone horribly wrong, and resulted in a lot of pain for shareholders. These are weekly bars from the date of listing (June 16) til now.


Look how the badly things have gone here. The shares were actually suspended during October this year, because the company got into severe financial distress, and in this situation shares cannot be bought or sold - your money is, for all intents and purposes, 'locked up'.

The advantage of hindsight here, and of waiting, is that we are able to assess the investment not on the initial IPO prospectus but on the subsequent results announcements that are issued to the LSE. In this case 18 months after listing on the junior market a series of cost increases, pressured margins and amounting debt resulted in a  catastrophic collapse in the share price.

An IPO prospectus will paint a company in the best possible light, it will no doubt will sound attractive, and of course any investor would want to get in at the bottom rung of the ladder of any potential super stock, but patience is a virtue and as demonstrated here, the truth will out eventually.





Link to comment

Thanks James,


Quick thoughts on this. Sabre appears to be an insurance company that is going public, selling motor insurance, having about 325,000 active policies at present, 150 employees, 86% of revenues are derived from motor underwriting policies, the remainder from associated activities.

Key points:

ordinary shares:

250m (250,000,000) 

Profits pre tax:

2016 £63.4m

2017 £44.2m ( ytd 9mth )

Pro rata'd in a linear fashion equates at 2017 F/Y £58.9m

Co intends to pay a dividend, subject to sufficient free cashflow, from June 2018


Expected date of admission, 22nd December 2017


Sales, most recent:

2016 £191.2m


Assets in 2016 as £511.2m - a lot of this amounts to intangibles and stripping this out reduces assets to £353.58m, which is a more realistic figure.


Company is looking to flat with an IPO value c£213m of which £206m will be used to exchange the Topco Preference shares (£206m) - it is worth noting these shares are 99.9% held by certain Mssrs Bell and Morris. So I read this as the owners are floating and will be foregoing a significant stake in Sabre. Upon floating the directors above will be rewarded £12m in shares, so will remain invested to some extent.


Any other views welcomed. On this one I don't have enough cash handy, so probably won't be subscribing. Good luck to all those who do!


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Joined 25/09/22 01:57
  • Posts

    • Hey @pravid17 I hope you're well.  In the leveraged trading industry there are brokers who don't hedge client's exposure and brokers (like ourselves) who do hedge client's exposure.  In a perfect world the exposure of short clients would net off the trades of long clients however this is not always the case. Our hedging model allows us to take an exposure in the underlying market for the remaining exposure which doesn't offset - This way we don't need to hedge every trade, worry about profits of our clients and results in lower costs for hedging in the underlying market (commissions, interest etc.). So say 60% of IG customer exposure in the ASX was long and 40% of exposure on the ASX was short. The 40% would net each other off but there's a remaining 20% of customers who need to be hedged to cover their positions. We go into the market and hedge this.  We make our money primarily through our spreads and overnight funding  with other fees making up a small proportion of our revenue. I would like to remind also that IG is regulated by several bodies globally, including top-tier regulators like the UK's FCA, Germany's BaFIN, Australia's ASIC - This should be quite reassuring from a dealing execution and transparency perspective.  I hope this helps, let me know if you have any other question 
    • A survey from Reviews.org, which featured 1000 Americans, found that as many as 1 in 4 US subscribers may quit the service in the next year.    Jeremy Naylor | Writer, London | Publication date: Friday 23 September 2022  There was an interesting breakdown, but the main reason was affordability. Only 18% said they would move to a cheaper competitor. IGTV’s Jeremy Naylor looks at the numbers. Netflix subscription woes Netflix Inc (All Sessions) could be in for a rough time ahead over the next 12 months if a new survey is anything to go by, which was conducted in the US. Out of the 1,000 adults that took part in this survey undertaken by Reviews.org, around 25% of those that were covered said that they would be cancelling their Netflix subscription within the next 12 months. Now, it says with that 25% of US subscribers to Netflix considering leaving, not to join a competitor, but mostly because of pressures on household bills. This is how it is split: rising cost of subscriptions - 40% inflation - 20% a lack of content - 22% spending more time on the services of others - 18% So you can see, a minority said they were going to other services, such as those provided by Disney Plus or Amazon Prime. The cost of Netflix has risen dramatically this year as its basic plan increased by 11% in January and its other plans by 20% to 25%. Now these were the first price increases for three years, so that itself is relatively new for a lot of subscribers. Netflix share price Let's take a look at the Netflix share price. You can see on the far left hand side of this chart the COVID lows at $290.39. We saw a whacking great increase there of 141% to the top and the record high in Netflix shares back in November 2021. And that was when subscriptions were rising, people were paying more for their services, and it was all humming beautifully. And then all of a sudden people started questioning the numbers of streaming services they were undertaking with some deciding to withdraw from Netflix. All of a sudden the big drops started coming through with profit warnings and sales warnings. We've recently hit a new low of $162.50. Since then there has been a little bit of an increase. We're currently trading at $232.75, but we are down by a margin of 1.75% in today's session, which reflects this news that we could well see a relatively large drop in subscribers for Netflix in the US within the next 12 months.
    • Market data to trade the week of 26 September: Nasdaq; NXT From the economic calendar next week IG technical analyst, Axel Rudolph, picks up on a short trade on the Nasdaq around US inflation data. Meanwhile, despite another light week of corporate data, Axel picks out the chart of Next plc (NXT) as an interesting trade to think about.          
  • Create New...