Jump to content
  • 0

IG's platform intraday volume


Guest s&p

Question

Hello,

I noticed that the level of intraday volume on IG's standard platform is different from other sites so how representive is the volume compared to the market as a whole?

Is IG's volume made up of just CFD's or the whole market?

Cheers

 

Link to comment

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

It depends. 

For shares the volume displayed would be that traded on the primary underlying exchange ( so, for example, with BARC it would be volume traded on the LSE, but not BATS, Chi-X etc).

For other exchange traded products ( index futures, commodities, etc.) we'd use, broadly speaking, the volume traded in the front month underlying from the relevant exchange. So currently for the Germany 30 DFB we show volume traded in the Eurex DAX Sep18 (GXU8), and we'll move between contracts (so to DEC18, MAR 19, etc) as usual on expiry. 

With FX the OTC nature of the market means it's not possible to calculate, and therefore display, traded volume for the overall market. Our indicator shows the number of changes (ticks) in our aggregate bid/offer, which gives you a rough idea of volume.

Link to comment

@Ludwik Chodzko-Zajko IG

Would appreciate a bit more clarification on this.

If we consider CFD/shares only

For example Netflix at the end of trading on Aug 10th 2018 shows as 2182376 on IG CFD platform. However, the volume shown in Yahoo Finance is 4,337,481

Why is this ?

 

 

 

Link to comment

Brokers and platforms calculate volume in different ways depending on asset class and which exchanges they are traded on and many assets are trades on more than one exchange, as was mentioned above.

The important aspect of volume is the profile of the volume chart, that must be consistent and give as true a representation of the relationship between time periods as possible.

See the trading view vol verses the IG vol below, the profile matches though the numbers and colours of the bars don't, this is quite common. It is the profile that is important.

nflx.thumb.PNG.45f9cf3b8de36d646a727978e0824d29.PNG 

Link to comment

Hello @Caseynotes. I Understand what you are saying but I have a particular discrepancy where the volume profiles are quite different.

This is shown in the attached image for Kier Group. The one on the left is from the IG share dealing platform chart and the one on the right is from Investing.com. One can see that while the volume profiles are broadly similar there are big differences between the two for the last day which was 14-Jun where IG is showing a volume of just over 1.3M and Investing.com is showing a volume of just over 11M. 

757562349_KierVolumeComparisoncropped.thumb.png.d2d6380ce7e96f464a26bf2d9fa87b90.png

I don't know which one to believe. Or are they both correct?

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Portuma's innovative approach to in-game advertising and Play-to-Earn (P2E) has sparked significant interest in the gaming and blockchain communities. Portuma's blockchain integration simplifies ad implementation for game developers and enables transparent transactions.  Its Win-Win Ecosystem aims to benefit all participants. advertisers gain reach, publishers earn revenue, and players get rewarded. While Portuma is a strong contender in the P2E and in-game advertising space, it's not the only player. Other projects are exploring innovative approaches to monetization, engagement, and rewards.  With its listing on Bitget, Portuma is poised to revolutionize the monetization of in-game advertising. But is it the ultimate solution, or just a stepping stone in the evolving P2E and in-game advertising landscape? Have you explored other P2E or in-game advertising projects? Do you think Portuma is a revolutionary force or a stepping stone? Share your thoughts in the comments!
    • Portuma's innovative approach to in-game advertising and Play-to-Earn (P2E) has sparked significant interest in the gaming and blockchain communities. Portuma's blockchain integration simplifies ad implementation for game developers and enables transparent transactions.  Its Win-Win Ecosystem aims to benefit all participants. advertisers gain reach, publishers earn revenue, and players get rewarded. While Portuma is a strong contender in the P2E and in-game advertising space, it's not the only player. Other projects are exploring innovative approaches to monetization, engagement, and rewards.  With its listing on Bitget, Portuma is poised to revolutionize the monetization of in-game advertising. But is it the ultimate solution, or just a stepping stone in the evolving P2E and in-game advertising landscape? Have you explored other P2E or in-game advertising projects? Do you think Portuma is a revolutionary force or a stepping stone? Share your thoughts in the comments!
    • LinqAI is making waves by offering versatile AI tools and fostering a decentralized future through Web3. LinqAI offers some compelling features that set it apart such as focus on Web3 Integration like deep commitment to integrating AI solutions with the decentralized future of Web3, limited supply token with a focus on revenue sharing and incentivizing long-term holders (similar to a UBI model within Web3) and Pre-Built AI Tools like Marketr, Engagr, and Analyzr offer specific solutions for marketing, customer service, and data analysis. So, is LinqAI the ultimate solution for AI-powered business solutions with Web3 Integration because it got listed on Bitget? It's a promising contender, but the market is evolving rapidly. What do you think? Is LinqAI a game-changer for AI-powered business solutions and Web3 integration, or just an interesting concept? Have you explored any other AI for business or Web3-integrated projects? Share your thoughts in the comments!
×
×
  • Create New...
us