Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Risk Management

Recommended Posts

Interesting short video where Jack Schweger tells a Paul Tudor Jones anecdote with addition input  from AK of Fallible. 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post

Good one @Caseynotes encapsulated many important points in one short clip, and nice to use an example from one of the legends who do all seem to have made the same mistakes retail traders are making.  Also interesting to note that most, if not all, seem to have been on the point of washout at some point in their careers.

I think the point about size of position is very valuable in the context of risk and money management.  Also related to that is the idea of going all in because you are "convinced" of something.  For me the risk mgnt part of this is about assessing how much you are willing to lose to get the potential gains in the context of the likelihood of being right.  When I conduct my analysis and assess an actual trade entry idea off that analysis (which includes Fundamentals assessment) if factor in whether I am going against the trend, have a confirmation that needs my preset rules set (or recognise I am bending my rules based on instinct and set my risk threshold accordingly.  I also have rules about how much of my capital I allow myself to risk on any trade set up (not any trade but the whole set up) and even if I bend trade trigger rules I never ever bend this fundamental money management rule.

A couple of other thoughts:

  1. When I complete some analysis I test it with other related markets and also ask myself what if I'm wrong, what scenarios could exist in direct opposition to the trade idea I am chasing, what would that look like in terms of market price action and in that event what will I do?  The answer to that last is if I see the market behave in a way that is inconsistent with my set up then I scratch as early as possible, sometimes even when I am still in the money.  My biggest losses came when I did not do the above.
  2. When I take trade I have an exit point mapped out and of course a stop placement.  If the trade is initially successful, and mindful that reversals can occur that rigger #1 above, I move my stops to reduce exposure and eventually to break even (BE).  I do not use trailing stops because I don't want to get stopped out by accident when I'm not looking unless at the BE point.  And I never, ever, ever move my stops back away from the market if it is approaching.  Can always seek another point to get back in if needs be.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Ok @TrendFollower I get all that and thanks for sharing.  I guess you didn't include FX in your assessment of markets going down faster than up as these are pairs and therefore relative but fully understand and agree the point, Shorting can be very lucrative very quickly BUT is inherently more risky for at least 2 reasons (at least on stocks): on balance markets go up more days than they go down (which is a corollary of you statement on speed of bear markets); in stocks you also take a hit on any dividends declared.  I would also add that the speed of the bear moves is such that they are harder (and more potentially costly in terms of stop distances) to catch.  Technical analysis can help with this as there is almost always a significant retrace off the first bearish move, if we can identify it correctly (as currently being discussed on stock indices elsewhere).

I assume you were talking about me when you mentioned a point I made in another post.  I agree with you that the trading system, methodology, plan, rules, call it what you will is vital, critical.  You have to have this, have practiced it and proven it and follow it rigorously.  I think risk and money management (and I make a distinction between these 2 different but related aspects) are part of that trading systems.  Where we seem to disagree is that you think technical analysis is something apart from a trading system and for me it is integral and core, along with Fundamentals at long term time-frame levels.  It is fine for us to disagree on this point, especially if you do not use analysis in this way but I just wanted to make the point that people who are extensive users of technical analysis (including some of the Market Wizards you pointed us to) use technical analysis as triggers to enter, locate stops and indeed exit a trade.  Again it is horses for courses, no absolute right or wrong or best here.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Oops! ok my bad @TrendFollower, didn't see the reference to Caseynotes.  But again, just to clarify, the charts, lines and ABCs etc ARE part of my trading system.  They are obviously not part of yours so that's fine for you to have the opinion you do but it is not correct for technical based traders like myself.  That's all I mean to point out.

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks for the responses @TrendFollower & @Mercury I must admit that when I started the thread it was really just as tear off and throw away platform for the video, I wasn't really expecting the Spanish Inquisition but then of course no one ever expects the Spanish Inquisition. I thought the video was well worth a share as it was so punchy and to the point, not covering the hows but simply reinforcing the whys. As has been pointed out many don't really understand how important risk management is til it's too late.

The discussions above reminded me of a number of things on the short selling of stock. One was of the differing horizons between buying and selling, buying you are looking up to a expanding sky, selling is looking down to a fast drop and possibly a box in a hole in the ground. Elon Musk was recently bit ching about short sellers trying to destroy Tesla but that was an exaggeration, short sellers are just gambling on what they see as an over valuation and the likelihood of an imminent correction. Valuation is all about perception and Musk was doing all he could to keep that perception high. I was also thinking back to when I was on a discussion forum at the time Woolworths  stock was falling. As the stock price was dropping the shouts going round were of "I'm buying all get here, price will never be this low again", there weren't many expressing caution. I was wondering just who was left holding all that worthless paper once the final collapse came, did the big players see what was coming and get out leaving the paper scattered throughout the country in the hands of small retail traders, many of them probably did.   

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      12,422
    • Total Posts
      63,139
    • Total Members
      83,828
    Newest Member
    Oadebayo
    Joined 19/09/20 05:01
  • Posts

    • I want to believe that, even if we had viruses for many years and we lived with them like nothing happened, this one is killing more people than it should. At least is what reports are saying. That is why countries are forcing lock-downs. Think about that a lock-down is going to extend the furlough policies all over the world again. I don't think a government want to pay that money out to citizens if they don't have to, and companies are going to have to close business for good if we have a second lock-down everywhere. I agree with the statement that we had many corona-viruses before i.e. common flu, but why now governments are taking these draconian measures to force people into a quarantine? If we had the same dangerous viruses always around why are they now locking people at their homes. Did they not care about people before? I think the virus is way more deadly than they tell us and that is why people are not really that scared of it. If we had all the information that is available to professionals we would be really scared and people would lock themselves without waiting any government to tell them. My wife is Chinese and I get their news first hand. They are not reporting what is really happening since the very beginning and it is really hard to trust the Chinese government  on anything related to this virus. They still have the problem there, they keep locking entire cities down for short periods the minute they see anything. It is not reported here in the news but every week they lock people down at their homes.  This virus is really nasty and if locking people down is going to stop it, let's do it. 
    • I agree with 99% of this - the current strain is virtually exact to a strain found in 2012 by a group of Chinese scientists, then when 6 of them died from exposure the virus was sealed and sent to Wuhan I challenged David Icke  to prove the excess deaths were'nt excess deaths, from the info I looked into I'm satisfied the virus is genuine and I'm probably one of the worlds biggest sceptics  From a lock down point of view I'd of thought the perfect place to test out compliance of mass herds would be the USA - hasn't happened strongly enough for me to be concerned but it shown those that could create such circumstances how compliment most people are.  
    • Corona virus has been with us since forever we just never mass tested before. There are no extra deaths this year than any other and it's the same unfortunate types who die of corona virus every year (over 80's with pre-existing conditions 90% of cases). Corona virus is always circulating in the population most people being completely unaware and asymptomatic, herd immunity is built and the virus mutates or dies out. Tests just show you have been exposed to the virus at some stage which could have been months ago and you were most likely asymptomatic. Vaccines don't work for corona virus because they mutate very quickly which is why there is no vaccine for the common cold (a corona virus). And why flu shots don't work very often because they are based on the previous years dominant strain not the current year's (the mass manufacturing would be too late). Covid 19 has already been mutating and the last studies I saw several weeks ago confirmed that as usual a particularly nasty strain becomes less deadly with each new mutation. Another 30,000 people will die next year from respiratory infections as it's the 5 year rolling average (covid 19 or not), weather it'll be covid 19 next year or another strain no one knows but they will keep the covid ball rolling anyway. So all in all it looks like lockdown til the end of time.      
×
×