What shall we say, Veronica? We're looking for the price to make a decisive rejection of the 200 EMA, as opposed to breaking through it (whipsawing), before we can say for sure that there is a trend and we commit our money. 🤓
Tempted to short it $37 if it closes below S2 and the omens are aligned (the blood of the goat, the appearance of the new moon, the taming of the shrew &c) 🤠
Ah but Python is obsolete. Now it's Rust, Go, Dart, F4rt, Poopy Buttcheeks etc etc etc.
Just an endless proliferation of languages, frameworks, la-de-da and cupcakes 😘🤪
Python is complex enough to get my head around. Why do I want to make my life even more difficult by learning a language that requires me to jump through extra hoops to get stuff done?
The Pine editor on TradingView is based on Javascript. Yet another language to learn to get simple stuff done
Well, I do not know how to reliably trade 15 min charts.
When you backtest on historical data, you don't factor in news and events. So trading news events on a minute scale is something you can probably only practice in demo.
Looking at stochastics (14, 3, 3) - they make sense when %D diverges from the price in an extreme area (%D fails to make a new high/low in overbought/oversold when the price does), then you sell or buy when %K crosses below it.
Is that right
Any use for stochastics when %D and %K are not in oversold/overbought zones?
You don't have to be mean. We are all capable of producing charts with indicators lined up and looking good. That's the f*king easy bit. Trying to trade it without benefit of hindsight is a different proposition altogether.
Yes, it's f*king obvious even without Williams %R slapped on top of it