Jump to content

786Trader

Members
  • Content Count

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

786Trader last won the day on May 10

786Trader had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

13 Good

About 786Trader

  • Rank
    Occasional Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I agree with you Mercury, the President likes to appear to be standing up for the "little man" and blame any woe on someone/something else, but especially the educated, professionals in finance and/or anyone who does not share his ever changing opinions. Fine politics, true enough. Not so great economics. He could very well see the adjustment many of us feel is due, falling on his watch. Worse still before the election, (Warren would give him **** hell were it so). You are correct in suggesting he will be the first to loudly blame the Fed and probably threaten it's very existence and try and rebuild it in his image. (Not a good idea, but great politic). All very funny were it not really happening...... Have a great weekend.
  2. Powell seems to be reluctantly listening to Trump, with Trump wanting super low interest rates releasing even more cheap money into the system. The connect between low unemployment and inflation has shifted, as so much of the employment is very low paid or low paid, meaning one works but has no money to show for it at the end of a week/month, bringing very little potential for growth for the majority. The majority are now employed, but poor. Looks good for employment figures but bears little resemblance to the reality on the ground where most mortals live. There is a sense of foreboding in the economy. A feeling that all is not as well as it would appear. It could be the unease that the President seems to inculcate generally, or the more likely being an adjustment is due. Next year is an election year and Trump's ace (correctly or not) has always been the economy. He needs the economy to motor on unimpeded. However, Trade wars, Oil wars, migrant bashing and his general unpredictability (lunacy?) has stifled what should be a simple job of managing an economy that by nature grows. Point being, unemployment numbers are no longer as relevant as factors for growth as the numbers themselves no longer reflect the income and positive income coefficient of the working populace. The working majority are working poor living on minimum wage, who have not had the benefit of inflation plus wage increases year on year, while living with commensurately higher cost of living increases over the last decade. Strip those numbers out and there is a clearer but not necessarily prettier picture of the state of play in the USA and other OECD economies.
  3. There is never a dull moment in the lumber market. Have been sitting on a considerable drag on my numbers with Lumber, as it wobbled and dropped to the 30000 mark. I called Lumber at 34000 May 2019 and was left scratching my head trying to understand what exactly is fair value. However, Lumber is slow to grow, until it's not. Upshot being Lumber has quietly grown 35% over the last month, turning red numbers green. I know Crypto's have bulled higher but Lumber has recovered it's value. And some. Perhaps overly so, as most markets tend to over compensate, both positive and negative. The timing of which still serves to confuse, which must be on account of my novice status.
  4. Coining it? Dull it aint. Bitcoin that is. 10% swings, often in a day. Pumping up the price and deflating it like a giant balloon. Price doubled in 3 months. But then again it did lose 70% of it's value in 2017. Definitely not a one way bet. Stability is not the watchword with blockchain currencies. Plus there is little or no rhyme or reason for the swings. Even if there are fewer and less frequent coins being created. Volatility is blockchain's friend. $10 000 BTC, (again?) why not? A $4000 BTC again why not? Glad it's not vegetables or ice cream though. Though it is in China (certain veg) atm. New currencies... so do you trust the ledger?
  5. Wont be bullish on gold till it breaks out of $1350 ceiling. A concerted break above 1350 is a strong bullish indicator. Anything less is flirtation/divergence and gold will settle back down below 1300. A firm breakout above 1350 then the upside is $1500+. That's my trigger anyway.
  6. Look for the Dow to trend down unless Powell drops interest rates, as cost of trade war will slowly erode any remaining gains from tax cuts. Dropping of rates will affect $ and bond value. Uncertainty regarding itchy twitter fingered POTUS and who he is going after next in relentless pursuit of narcissism. Recent experience with Mexico suggests a man who cannot be trusted and who considers himself a master dealmaker (rich coming from an ex bankrupt) without even the basest of understanding of the art of negotiation. Which is a shame. Dow bias is negative late 19 to 20-22. Bearish sentiment it maybe, and have made plays to that effect. Would like to be proved wrong. (even if I lose a bit of money).
  7. Regarding UK European vote, new prime minister and Halloween. Brexit party is a reworking of UKIP which took 25% of the vote back in 2014 and less than 2% 2019, but without the obvious racist bias. Tory vote disintegrated due to inability to get a deal, which still looks nigh on impossible as cooperation and compromise are profanity and anathema to the 2 principle parties. Brexit party wants a hard Brexit (WTO rules) and has no creditable plan for the future barring bland paper promises and rhetoric. Tory party see the success of Brexit party and want some of that populist vote so will vere toward the cliff that is hard Brexit. So it will come down to a binary choice come Halloween: Brexit without a deal (10% tariffs and all) or Revoke article 50. The May deal negotiated with the EU being dead as a Dodo. There is still time for an election and a referendum (the results of which will be disputed by whomever loses). In short; more chaos, division and uncertainty. Then we look at the shy and reticent President Trump and witness his weakness for tariffs again. Not content with 25% on China he is now threatening Mexico with escalating tariffs which will please all of those vehicle manufacturers no end, having just completed the new NAFTA, well more NATA without the "free". His penchant for tariffs knows no bounds. Blaming immigration or foreigners for ones ills is classic psychology. He wants America to go back to the 50's of his youth it would seem, even if most the youth of the 21st century have no interest in going back to a time they never knew. Old man thinking. Combine that with some old fashioned Gun Ship diplomacy in the strait of Hormuz and we have the potential for genuine uncertainty/war in the middle east again. The markets will love that. What is the correct strategy? Considering the fundamentals of the global economy are in pretty good shape were it not for inconveniences such as trade wars, unnecessary tariffs and potential oil wars in the gulf and the world's most powerful leaders being complete narcissists. Strategy#1: buy low, sell high. How low will the Dow go? That depends on how determined administrations are to appear completely **** minded, atm they are very determined...
  8. @ mindthegap Did not agree with much of the linked you tube video. Thought he was full of it to be honest. BS with a sprinkling of useful truth. He may have been to Asia but completely failed to understand them. Foxconn make Apple devices in China because there is no way Apple could make them as well, as quick or as cheaply in the US or even Mexico. For example. So either prices go up or Apples margins go right down. Plus everyone is paying more for anything made in china, including simple items like shoes. Not inflationary at all. Ever considered China may do to Apple what Trump has done to Huawei. Trump is a bull in China's shop. And we will all have to pick up the tab.
  9. Interesting postulation. The big bear? Not quite so convinced. For mostly obvious political reasons to do with supply and demand. Brent to $28? Not anytime soon. WTI crude an unlikely maybe, but Brent ? I am wholly unconvinced. The markets are not over supplied. Demand is as strong as ever. Not to mention sanctions on Iran and Venezuela. Saudi will not continue to sell oil on the cheap, even if Trump tells them to, though the Russians will with their current batch of chlorinated crude. A $28 Brent implies a Dow @18000 or less or vast reserves newly discovered. A market adjustment where the Dow rocks down to 20K late 2020 is a solid maybe, but oil? Graphics tell a story, but the giant big bear has not convinced me. Personally, I can see oil increasing through political tension and the strong possibility of actual conflict. The strait of Hormuz controls 30% of global supplies. Support at the $68 mark is considerable.
  10. 😁Quite correct a compromise should be the order of the day. Whether and when are closer to market concerns. President Trump tends to see these sort of negotiations as win/lose,rather than give and take (based on previous evidence and behaviour). My point being he doesn't accommodate compromise gladly and his advisers have an uphill struggle selling him the concept that compromise is a win. He is pragmatic when pushed, though and that could be his saving grace. President Xi is more inscrutable and opaque as is common in the East, though sports a healthy pragmatic streak himself, so face saving compromise may well win out. But not necessarily. Media circus is also valid, though that is how we receive most of our information and is filtered accordingly. "Sudden Death raised a smile.🙂 Have a good weekend.
  11. @TrendFollower US debt to China is $1.1 trillion. China hold $2.1 trillion in US govt bonds and treasuries. However, total US debt is aprox $22 trillion= all the assets held by all US pensions and investments. China, newer on the scene to creating debt has been making a fair go at creating debt mountains themselves, currently $34 trillion and counting, so need an ever expanding economy to cover their costs. Ergo China needs an export surplus and higher value exports at that. For the US and China it is a case of both of them wanting their cake and eating it. How does the hand get played out? That's the trillion dollar question. Xi has the advantage of time. Trump the advantage of financial clout (he's their biggest customer). However, the poker analogy is not really fair as the results are not binary, more quantum than binary. There are no big winners from an escalation of the current situation and the downsides are far from desirable. If this were to become a matter of attrition, Xi would win as Trump would run out of time and fail to be re-elected on the back of poor economic performance. Though Xi himself would hardly be sitting comfortably on his golden throne in Beijing either for the same reason. Who will blink first?
  12. As the trade war of words and tariffs rumbles on ominously, what was initially a match between President Trump and President Xi has embroiled the worlds markets in a game they did not need or want to play. Flirting with unnecessary turmoil and genuine recession was obviously a possibility when Mr Trump initiated this fight, thinking perhaps no one would dare call his play, but Xi also has an ego and is the head of a totalitarian, nominally communist state of 1.4 billion souls and not subject to the checks and balances of elections every four years. Making him an equally formidable adversary. When Dragons and Tigers fight a draw is the best outcome. Personally, I agree that the current trade agreements with China need adjustment. China is now the second largest world economy, no longer an economic novice and needs to accept that it has changed. With that change come responsibility. However, in order to facilitate change in the East one needs to understand the mindset. Unfortunately, Trump is subtle as a sledgehammer, somewhat devoid of the notion of tact or what the Asians call Face. Telling people what to do, then threatening them is not model diplomacy, not exactly art of the deal. As a consequence we are where we are, looking at a potentially turbulent June. Volatility is a traders friend so its going to get mighty friendly, with the only certainty being the price of oil. Which is another story, though esteemed President Trump has had significant input regards the price of oil too. Stormy weather ahead. Great for traders with Iron constitutions. The problem with high stakes poker is the stakes can quickly get too high.
  13. Ironic, perhaps that this time the market shakes and falls (equities and commodities) that the new trend for growth is more bizarre and abstract: Crypto. Something that exists only in the ether (pardon the pun), is not tangible or even easy to spend and only exists in code in the cloud. So as the markets wobble and bend in the world of men, the best investment right now is one that is not real. How does that make sense? I must be old fashioned, believing money represents time and energy exchange for the real, and such energy should not be stored but needs to keep moving, the physical manifestation being cold hard cash, exchanged for commodities, goods or services. But I am still having difficulty with concept Crypto, barring it being a wheeze to generate instant virtual currency as substitute for the physical paper stuff, just much more of it, without the backing of ,say ,Gold. Am I making sense? I find myself trading on something that exists essentially only in the abstract, yet has value because we put a price on it, but the it of itself only lives in the virtual. I was wandering if this is more symptomatic of the general madness that seems to be afflicting our planet and minds here in 21st century or if it's just me.
  14. Both. Depending. Have gone long and short on oil, gasoline, FX and especially Wall street ( most every time it reaches a new high). Have had less fortune with Lumber which seems to react in it's own sweet way, which I blame on the Chicago weather. Generally am looking for a swing. Then take the money and run. Have found stop losses set too conservatively are triggered easily when volatility is there. So approx 20% + or -, is the stop, which seems huge but has worked for me so far. Go to go as have duties that need attending to...
  15. Decided to try this Spreads and CFD's as an experiment, experience and alternative to the sweet 1.5% on offer with ISA's. I had a strategy, still adjusting. I have a plan. But having no experience is a bit of a handicap. I detached myself from the money so it was no longer personal. I have had enormous fun and learned more about the global economy in 4 months and 10 days than the 25 years I have been reading the economist, running a small property business or talking with my very cautious banking friends (all of whom advised me not to spread or trade CFD's ). Opened a demo account and a real one. Despite being clobbered in the lumber markets ( attracted to the volatility) oil, gasoline and tracking the Dow have more than bailed me out. Have I won every week? Not on your Nelly! Did I take it personally when trades did not work out due to impatience, greed or poor timing? To begin with yes. Patience and belief have become my friends, even if the belief has come down to **** minded instinct on occasion. Result? A profit of 38% in real money and 25% including margin or 37.5% without in demo after 4 months. Too much information is worse than not enough so have taken what makes sense. Have traded out of all my positions when Wall street hit 26671, with the exception of Calls on Wall street June 19 (26500), call on Footsie @6725 May and a call on June USD/GBP @1.3100. Still long on oil, though have regularly taken profits. Am still learning about calls and puts so will ride them out or cancel at close. If one is to enter this with intention of it being one's sole income, then you will need at least £50k as your base and not be upset if you lose it all. Do not be obsessive about it either, remember to enjoy life. Don't take losses personally, see them as part of the process. That's about all I can think to say on the subject for now. Save I am enjoying this far more than I imagined I would, but maybe that's because I am in profit.
×
×