Provaton

Just shows the danger of showing short clips. He did correct the numbers later when questioned during the Q&A. If you had just done a quick search before posting you could have discovered this yourself. Please spend some time checking what you post, as mentioned by somebody else earlier, stuff like this matters.

FALSE https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/no-hospitalised-covid-19-patients-in-nsw-arent-all-vaccinated/ NSW Health director of health protection Jeremy McAnulty misspoke when initially detailing the vaccination status of people in hospital. Dr McAnulty later corrected the record during the same press conference, identifying that everyone in intensive care units (ICUs) in the state due to COVID-19 was unvaccinated – except for one individual who was partially vaccinated. Official stats back this up as well: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20211104.pdf Only 45 fully vaccinated in ICU since June:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-9318-idUSL1N2P21CV "Posts are sharing numbers reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations and claiming that it proves the vaccines have killed people. This is false. Anyone can submit a report into the system and the reports do not imply causality."

This is the real danger of this thread. Unsubstantiated nonsense which could have real consequences. You can't stand anybody questioning anything you write. You resort to insults and never address any points that anybody else makes on "your" thread.

We've all tried that mate, he just ignores it and moves onto the next meme/Twitter post/conspiracy theory/etc.

Nah, conspiracy websites and random Twitter accounts are far more interesting....

Still waiting for the actual report...I've tried to find it myself but to no avail.

So we now move onto the next chart complete with quote from random Twitter account... If you keep them coming fast enough nobody has time to argue against them!

Did you not read my post? I was referring to your quote: "The vaccines are showing extremely poor if not zero efficacy" I made the point that your quoted paper said the opposite.

As soon as anybody argues against anything on Caseys thread the insults start coming....

From the Lancet paper you referenced a few posts back: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext The evidence is in front our your face, in the paper you referenced @Caseynotes but you chose to ignore it.

But where is the actual report @Caseynotes ? The article you posted is from an Italian newspaper, not from an official Italian Government source.

me too. It's very selective, it is the "bottom 40" i.e. the 40 countries with the WORST deaths/100k population. There are 150+ more countries that have a lower death rate....

Reading the full report does not lead to this conclusion. The death and hospitalisation rates are severely reduced to those vaccinated: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf

Thanks, but I think I'll stick with listening to 120 of the worlds leading scientists who published a grave warning about the UK easing restrictions too soon, rather than "Team Sweden Unlocked": https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01589-0/fulltext

Probably also affected by seeing friends and family dying or suffering from long Covid. Seeing a pandemic sweeping across the world and killing millions doesn't help with my anxiety, regardless of any advertising campaign. Maybe because Britain is looking like a laughing stock to the rest of the world as it gears up to open up while cases and variants run rampant?

Rather than posting a randomised chart you could just have posted it in chronological order, or would that not fit your narrative?

I'm not complaining, I'm just pointing out how the numbers in the chart you posted are collected. The chart you posted, at first glance, gives the impression that the Covid vaccines are very dangerous. The danger here is that your post influences somebody from delaying/not getting the vaccine.

Fact Check-VAERS data does not prove thousands died from receiving COVID-19 vaccines: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-deaths-idUSL1N2LV0NY

This video is from 29 December (if you follow the Twitter link to the youtube video) BEFORE the new restrictions.....

Well that took 30 seconds. Your Stockholm population density is correct. However, NY population density is 27,000 per square mile not 5,239 according to the actual City of New York Government website: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/planning-level/nyc-population/population-facts.page Only a factor of 5 out, keep trying.... And you're posting stuff from "Fabulous Mrs Fox" on Twitter, that well known statistician 🤣

I'll try one last time to get my point across, this time without any stats or charts, simply a link to a thread on Reddit with people describing their experiences of getting back into running post Covid. These are the people that aren't in the death stats. You will probably say that they are just "random people on the internet". Well I am part of this community and know several of them in the thread. I also know of two others who are experiencing affects long after recovering from Covid- one still gets out of breath after walking up stairs (was previously very fit) months later and another, a semi-pro singer who literally can't sing anymore. @Caseynotes Keep posting your memes and **** but be aware that you contributing to people taking covid less seriously and ultimately ending up like those in this thread:

Interesting if true. Looks suspicious though. "Contains OS data Crown copyright and database right 2020/21" doesn't look like a usual ONS disclaimer. Can you post a link to the ONS source? otherwise not worth anything, I could knock this up in Excel in 5 minutes....

Just from your posts this afternoon: Sweden: "very little excess mortality in 2020" DISPROVED: Covid: "99.9% survival rate" DISPROVED UK vs Sweden population density: DISPROVED I could go on...

Population per square km: UK 275 Denmark 137 Sweden 25 Finland 18 Norway 15 UK is 10x more dense than Sweden....