Jump to content

Filling in your deal ticket


Recommended Posts

Filling in your deal ticket

If you want to trade now you can select the ‘Deal’ tab, fill in your size, and select one of the following:

 

  • Current price or better: This default trade option will open your position at the current price or better if the market moves in your favour.
  • Points through current: This gives you more control of your execution by allowing you to trade through the current price, up to certain tolerance as defined in your deal ticket. This is useful in reducing order rejection in a volatile or illiquid market, or if you trade in larger size.
  • Market order:  If you want to increase the likelihood of being filled, irrespective of price, you can select Market Order.

 

2017-08-29 14_11_35-IG Trading Platform _ Spread Betting.png

To increase the chance of successful execution, the IG deal ticket will default to accept partial fills. If you use this feature, IG will only partially fill a trade as an alternative to outright rejection, and you will never be partially filled if an entire fill is possible.

 

We also offer a range of stops and limits so you can exit your open position at specific price levels. These include trailing stops which will follow your trade if the market moves in your favour, and guaranteed stops that will always be filled at the exact level you select (even if the market gaps over the level you selected). Regular stops are available too.

 

If you want to trade when the market gets to a certain level, use the order tab:

 

A stop order, once triggered, will be filled at the prevailing market price, however this could be a less favorable level than you selected.

 

A limit order will give you control over your entry point, but your entry level must be placed at a more favorable level than the current market. Once triggered your entry level will always be the price you selected or better.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi - if you are on a CFD or spread betting account you can use the advanced dealing options to get partial fills on MM and SETSqx stock. If you are dealing on a regular share dealing account or equivalent then these options wouldn't be available as you can only deal in your full size via the 'RSP' or 'Get Quote' functionality. 

 

I hope this clarifies things for you. 

Link to comment

Thanks for you reply James.

 

I just heard the latest news from IG dealing desk that IG no longer support partial fills feature on MM stock on spread betting and CFD. It did work on my spread betting and CFD accounts before but failed last two days.

 

It is business decision that was I was told. If it is so it is realy a bad news for investers/traders....Not sure if it is temporary change or pemanent.

 

Regards,

Kev

 

 

Link to comment

Thanks for your reply - I believe there may have been some confusion on the specifics of this query. To clarify, 

 

CFD and Spread Betting: Partial fills are possible on SETSqx stock.

Share dealingPartial fills are not possible on SETSqx stock and this isn't available on the deal ticket. 

 

There are other reason an order maybe rejected, however this would require a more in depth discussion on a case by case basis. As an example if there is a large market movement or volatility and you are requesting partial fills, but the price has already moved, you're still going to be rejected. It would be best to call in this instance. 

 

In this instance it's better to use different deal conditions (such as market order or points through current). 

 

Link to comment

Hi,

 

From what I am understanding is:

Partial fills are possible on SETSqx stock

Partial fills are impossible on SEAQ stock

 

Seems dealing desk's words were right. 

For me partial fills worked on the same stock in the same situation before (both SETSqx and SEAQ stock )but not working today.

 

I have to say Byebye to this feature.

Link to comment

The reason you wouldn't be able to get partial fills on a SEAQ stock is because these generally won't be available on the leverage platform. This is due to a small market cap omitting them from dealing on leverage, rather than the specific stock deal type. 

 

If there is a specific stock you'd like to discuss please call our dealing deal or use the new web trading platform to double check eligibility. 

Link to comment
  • 2 years later...
Guest Redback

. What is the "44"?  Is the price GBP 4,435.86 to sell?

. What is "size" units?  Is that the total amount of money you want to spend or the number of stocks?

. What does "per point minimum" mean?

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Guest Redback said:

. What is the "44"?  Is the price GBP 4,435.86 to sell?

. What is "size" units?  Is that the total amount of money you want to spend or the number of stocks?

. What does "per point minimum" mean?

Hi, it sounds like you are on the SB or CFD platform in which case you are trading the difference in price movement rather than actually buying stocks so the price configuration is shifted so that the first number to the left of the decimal point is 1 IG Point.

so if you buy at 4435.86 and then sell at 4439.86 and your trade size is £1 per point you will have made 4 points = £4 pounds.

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • What’s the average spread like, generally? How does it compare to current conditions? I’ve been using IG for over a decade, and I’ve noticed a growing sense of dissatisfaction, not just from myself but across various forums too. I think they really need to prioritize some core areas—like improving the iOS app and refining the API. While your issue may not be directly tied to the API, in theory, if you know how to use it well, it should offer a better experience compared to the web platform or the standard retail charts. Just my two cents. As for the problem, it’s definitely not about liquidity in these markets. I’d say it’s more likely due to the rise of algorithmic trading over the years. These high-speed algorithms can take advantage of price movements, often leading to short periods of slippage for regular traders as prices shift rapidly. Market orders, meant to execute quickly at the best available price, are more prone to slippage compared to limit orders. Since market orders prioritize speed, they don’t guarantee a specific price. If the market price changes in the short moment between when you place the order and when it's actually executed, your trade will go through at the new price, whether it’s better or worse than expected. This makes market orders riskier in fast-moving or volatile markets. By using the API along with a low-latency server, you can reduce the risk of slippage in some cases. What kind of latency are you experiencing with the API? Avoid using a home connection for this—opt for an affordable VPS, even a $5 one will significantly improve your experience.
    • Cardano’s 3.8% price surge might be from all the updates and partnerships they’ve been rolling out lately. I’ve noticed that every time they release some big news, like a new upgrade or collaboration, there’s always a jump in price. The community around Cardano is really strong too, which seems to play a role in driving things. A few weeks back, I swapped some tokens using https://stealthex.io , and I remember seeing a bunch of people talking about Cardano on forums. Maybe that hype is finally showing in the price. Either way, it’s nice to see some action in the market again.
    • Hi everyone, just a short post at this stage as I want to see if there is any interest in this topic first.  I’ll likely contact IG but wanted to see if there are other thoughts and experiences first as there are several issues I am seeing and it’s a bit complicated, so didn’t want to write some long rambling post. i trade the Dax and Nasdaq indices and use an automated strategy using the API.  I am effectively trying to do a trend trading strategy but on short timescales.  So i set fairly tight stops and then run those trades that leave the area to the plus side.  My win rate is low so have a lot of losers so slippage on stops is quite important to me. i have a database of trades and 5m data going back over 3years now - so have a lot of data to work with. i measured the stop slippage several years ago and it was fine for this method but have re measured it recently as I noticed the losing trades were a bit too large and it seems that the slippage has increased quite a lot for Nasdaq (not then Dax). I am trying to see what is behind this. Anyone interested or tackling similar issues? Thanks David 
×
×
  • Create New...
us