Jump to content
  • 0

Daily funded spread bet and quarterly (forwards)

Question

Hi

I tend to trade as a position trader and currently have open several cash funded spread bet positions on numerous shares (usually for several weeks or longer).

I have recently discovered that I can spread bet these positions as forward / quarterly funded positions and the IG academy suggests that this method is more cost effective than holding these longer term positions as Cash funded positions.

I understand that the wider spread reflects the increased cost and the material I have found on IG suggests this reflects the overnight funding charges for the quarter.

I can’t find anything that allows me to clearly see the difference in costs between holding a given long term position as a cash bet versus a quarterly bet and whether there is actually any benefit to be derived from doing so.

Can anyone help or advise. Does holding a quarterly position result in lower overall funding charges compared to cash and is there a cut off point where holding the position as a cash bet results in lower overnight funding charges.  I.e. If I open a quarterly position and then sell with a week would I of been better to open as cash funded position.

I don’t find the charge information particularly clear Andy helpful in allowing me to work out the differences (if indeed there are any)

Thanks
Justin

Share this post


Link to post

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Hey @Greeners - Let me try and break it down a little. As stated above this needs to be something you manually work out based on duration of trade etc. When you are looking at the DFB or Cash market for shares for example which have daily charges, you're going to need to consider...

Overnight funding if your deal is in GBP
Size × closing price × LIBOR +/- 2.5% ÷ 365
Based on LIBOR one month overnight rate

Therefore in this case you are looking at
£xxxxx X xxxx X (0.5% + 2.5%) / 365 = £xxxx a night 

You then need to add to cost to get in/out of the spot trade (i.e. the spread or commission)

If you are planning on holding a position for a number of days / weeks as you said it is worth thinking about using the Forwards contract which may be cheaper for you. You will pay a larger spread to open, however there is no overnight charges applied each night.

The cost on the forward will just be the spread or commission to get in/out of the trade. Both trades should incur the same FX charge if required. 

FX / commodities etc are slightly different but let me know if I can help on those. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Hi @Greeners, as size of bet is a factor in the overnight cost calculations and duration is a factor of total cost and these will be variable both by trade and by trader you would probably want to consider 'on average' am I better off with Spots or Forwards. Each trade and trading style will differ and make a publishable cut off calculation for all traders problematic and potentially misleading.

I haven't seen any such calculations on IG's web pages. One way to ascertain which would benefit you in particular would be to run a test on demo to find the on average best system though I do appreciate that will take time.

Anyone else with any ideas? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

@caseynotes 

Thanks for the response.  I did think about using the demo account but as it's free it doesn't actually show any historical charges from which to figure out the cost differences.  I decided to place a couple of live positions last night and interestingly the cost for one of the shares was minimal making a quarterly position  and as you say the overall cost is largely dependent on a number of factors so its not really a black and white answer to my question.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Thanks @jamesIG 

I assume trade size is the price per point. I’ve done some calculations and the result is within the range of what I’ve been paying so think I’ve sussed it out.  In addition if I go long on a position over the long term using the cash/spot price and it moves in my favour then the nightly interest I’m charged is also going to increase the more successful the trade becomes.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      7,237
    • Total Posts
      35,866
    • Total Members
      45,866
    Newest Member
    fefcoweb
    Joined 18/08/19 18:33
  • Posts

    • @Mercury, I see you have started to look at Coffee. Excellent. If you look at both Arabica and London (Robusta) then one could argue that we are witnessing oversold conditions especially if you look at longer term timeframes like the 'Monthly' and potentially the 'Weekly'.  For me it is about identifying potential breakouts. We may see that in the days and weeks to come but right now at this moment in time both on the 'daily' are trading below 20, 50, 100 and 200 DMA's so it is still bearish for me. It is one I am monitoring closely.  Commodities can offer some excellent trading opportunities and produce some of the strongest trends. I do not use or apply EWT but if you can use it to effectively increase your chances of success which leads to a greater chance of profiting then all the best. 👍
    • I was watching a TV series called "This Giant Beast That is the Global Economy " starring and narrated by Kal Penn, actor in "House" and speech writer with Obama.  It doesn't really cover any new concepts, although there were a few interesting observation in their, like what the most important commodity in the global economy is... (I wont spoil it for anyone who hasn't seen it yet and wants to but it was not that obvious and is blindingly obvious in retrospect). One thing that did pop out that I though was relevant for the forum was that the price of coffee is way too low for farmers to make money.  The logical conclusion of this is that they will farm something else and supply will be curtailed and then prices will go up, the basic perpetual cycle of supply and demand change.  This very basic fundamentals proposition motivated me to look at coffee on the charts to see if there was a building opportunity and I think there may be.  I will preface my analytical assessment with the statement that I know very little about the coffee industry other than how to select a great bean type as a consumer and make a great flat white. If I look at the long term charts (Quarterly/Monthly) I see that coffee trades in a large range from about 4000 to 34000 at the extremes (or $0.40 - $3.40 per US pound if you prefer).  This seems to represent the classic economics supply and demand curve in candle pricing form.  With the available data we can see a set of cycles between the market top and bottom zones that in the main run fairly directly between the zones.  At this point my thesis would be that if you catch the market right at either extreme you can hold until price reaches the opposite end of the range (net 30,000 points or so).  For best results you want a straight run rather than one with large reversals. If I apply EWT to the chart I see a series of 1-5s and A-B-C, although this is arguably less relevant than for markets that do not operate between such obvious ranges as the key is obviously to look at trading when the market enters, or more correctly, then exits the range extremes zones.  Still it is interesting to see that the run up in the mid 70s was a motive 1-5 that still marks the high point in price.  After that I see a series of massive A-B-Cs culminating in a slightly lower high extreme price in the late 1990s than that printed in the 70s (still went into the market top zone though). This high then produced a 1-5 down to the lowers price on the chart around 2002.  The next move up to 2011 could be either an A-B-C or a 1-5 and the current move looks decidedly like an A-B-C.  If the 2011 move is an A-B-C and the current move is also an A-B-C then I would expect the current move to be a larger wave B that ends higher than the previous low and spawns a massive rally that ends higher than the previous high and is a 1-5 that goes pretty much straight up.  Either way the current move is and A-B-C so will end higher than the previous low and as most of the bear moves end inside the market bottom zone I can reasonable conclude that this move will end somewhere between 4200 - 8000. Let's look at a shorter term charts to see if we can refine this.  I have 2 weekly charts attached, the first of which shows the bearish move down from 2011 and the second of which zooms in on the final wave C of C.  In the first chart I can see a clear A-B-C structure to all 3 of the larger A-B-C wave form of the bearish move.  This confirms an A-B-C and not a 1-5 and also confirms that the market is in a final wave C of C, which will spawn that Bull market.  I also have a nice upper resistance trend line and 2 possible lower lines (both may be valid) with a lot of good current (green circle) and prior pivot (purple circle) touches. If we look at the second weekly chart the wave C of the larger wave C (from the wave B pink) is cutting a clean 1-5 pattern and looks to have just completed the 3-4 part of this.  The rally to wave 4 (blue) is in a-b-c, which you would expect of a retrace so the next bearish phase should be a final wave 5 that will mark the end of the overall bear market.  I would be looking for price to hit one of the lower channel lines but inside or on the 8000 level ideally.  Note all previous moves that did not make it to the extremes zone were not wave Cs (As or Bs) and all the 5 did.  So the conclusion to this is that all wave Cs or motives 1-5s penetrate the extremes zones of the range but As and Bs tend not to.  Also 1-5 waves tend to run hard and fast and make more extreme price tops.  The current move looks line a Wave C that would spawn a 1-5. Finally looking at the daily chart the current bearish phase looks to have put in a 1-2 (green) of that final 1-5 I am looking for.  I will be tracking this for the 3-4-5 and other signals to see if I can spot the turn.  As and when price breaks out of the upper weekly trend line resistance I think a strong bull market will be in play that could be a motive 1-5 that makes it into the extreme market top zone.  In all of the bull turns through there has been a strong short term retrace so the best strategy might be to let the turn happen and spot the initial retrace turn.  In these agri type commodities getting in on such a range extremes turn has to be the way to play it.  I will be tracking this one with interest for a while but it will require some time still to mature I think. 
    • I last posts around 2-3 weeks ago on this thread and I have seen Litecoin go down towards the lower $70's. It is currently trading at $76-77 at the time of writing this post.  Litecoin's chart looks pretty ugly. It is currently trading below its 20, 50, 100 and 200 DMA's which is very bearish.  Only really Bitcoin (significantly) and Bitcoin Cash are trading above their 200 DMA's on the 'daily.  Litecoin will need some very bullish news or a big move from Altcoins / Bitcoin otherwise it could easily fall down into the 60's.  After the halving event, it seems, Litecoin has been heavily sold. This capital may now shift to Bitcoin. That is my suspicion and assumption and the price action will confirm this. I will be interested to see if the divergence between Bitcoin and Litecoin increases. 
×
×