Jump to content

Stop loss - Risk or Money management?


Recommended Posts

Saw a post by @Caseynotesfrom Sept 6 on podcasts about stop placement where a professional was discussing the % room allowed for stops as against long term returns.  Quite interesting, although I wasn't sure of the basis for the % calc but anyway it made me think about the stop placement question and what stops are really used for.  I flirted with this topic in discussion with @TrendFollower but we never really got into it.  We tend to be very focused on getting into a trade, understandably so, but not so much on exiting (whether cutting losses or maximising profits, which was the basic premise of the podcast - if you haven't seen it worth check it out).

So simple questions really:

  1. Do people view stops loss placement as risk management or money management (or is there any different)?
  2. How do people select stop placement (great to see an historic example or even better a current one)?

I'll start by attempting to answer my own question from my personal perspective (long term swing trader using short term charting - 1 hour - to trigger trade entry)

  1. I think they are different.  I think about risk management as assessing the risk that the trade you take is wrong (i.e. the probability of success vs failure) and assessing the potential returns across the various opportunities you have identified vs the potential cost to access them, but I guess it is hard to eliminate the quantification of the loss that would be suffered as a result of being wrong from the assessment/appetite for taking a risk.  Money management is about ensuring you don't risk too much on a single trade (or at a single period of time) thus preserving your capital to live to fight another day and wait patiently for the better set ups.  The latter is clearly about stop loss to me.
  2. My trading methodology is about minimising both the risk of being wrong and the potential cost if I am.  Therefore I wait until I see markets turning according to my road map projections at key support/resistance levels and place close stops below/above these level plus a bit to account for ST volatility.  In a high volatile period (e.g. NFP data releases) I need wider margin of error.  In a quieter time I can use closer stops.  Alex Elder said, "enter a trade when the market is quiet".  I think this is what he meant.  I do have an overall backstop rule to not risk more than 3% of my account balance on a single trade nor 10% total at any time (this assumes stops work and does not account for flash moves - i.e. I am not using guaranteed stops).

Using a recent example (see chart below). I entered the EURUSD Long when the 4 hourly Triangle was swiftly broken with stops below the recent lows.  My logic was that a reversal below this point (and creating a new lower low vs the 15 Aug low) negated my set up thus requiring a reassessment of the market direction.  I then entered a Long again when the market came back down to retest the Fib 62% and placed my stops below the Fib 78% (also the retest of the original breakout point).  If this level was broken my set up would be challenged and I was unwilling to take 2 positions below this point (my first position still being as per the original entry.  Once the market rallied up through the Daily Triangle I took another Long (actually a bit higher than shown on the chart  round the 11,440 point) with stops below the green line support level (circa 11,400 or a bit lower).  When I woke up and saw that my overnight trade was triggered I move my first two trades stops to break even to reduce my total account exposure.  This also frees me up to engage in a pyramiding strategy on a potential fast and long EURUSD rally.  My final trade so far (as signaled to @TrendFollower this morning) was a Long on the breakout of resistance at about 11,480.  My stop level on this one was below the second green line support level (and crucially below the Daily Triangle line but since then I have moved it to join my third trade stop level at about 11,388.

Love to get people's thought on Risk vs Money management and stop placement and also in flight management (i.e. do you move stops use trailing stops etc?)

EURUSD-1-hour_071118.thumb.png.f00e62a2a794138f83e6b8043d05b39d.png

Link to comment

@Mercury,  for me the definition of Risk management is simple, it is the risk you take when entering a trade and that is the stop loss, the size of your stop times your position size is the risk. Money management is where I clump everything else, amount of account risked on each trade, amount of account at risk in all active trades and the amount being risked to hold a trade open. 

For exits, I may use a target if price is refusing at a significant level or otherwise I will either just trail a long at the most recent higher low or I might use a stepwise ATR, both are very similar in any case.

Link to comment

Interesting responses guys thanks.  Let me ask a related question:

If you had 2 trade ideas where you were going to risk £100 on both but on one you stood to make £100 and on the other you stood to make £1000 which would you take?  That's easy with the info available so I will answer that one, obviously the larger gain.

Now what if I told you that the probability of the £1000 gain coming off was 5% (95% chance you lose your stake not it just doesn't quite make as much as £1000) and the probability of the £100 gain coming off was 95%, which would you take?

 

Link to comment

I would say that if you take 20 trades you can expect to win 1/20 (5% change) times £1000 and loose 19 times £100. So you will probably loose £1900 and win £1000. So this will give you a loss of £900. If you win 19 times a £100 and only loose £100 once you'll end up making £1800. I'll go for the £100 gain with a probability of 95%.

Link to comment

Correct of course @FGJB, thanks for playing along.  This is of course a simplistic illustration that seeks to show risk management is, in my opinion (and in my methodology), not just about the stake you risk but also about the chances of success (NP if others just use the stake - no skin off my nose) .  This realisation led me to conclude that it is far more profitable to seek to identify high "likelihood" of success trading ideas and to wait patiently for them to take shape rather than take ideas that "promise" big returns but are more risky.  I use the term likelihood because I do not employ actual statistical analysis to assess probability, rather I use technical analysis married to fundamentals and trend identification on long term charts.

That does not mean I do not trade the other kind (my current bias for Long EURUSD is an example) it just means that I have to be a lot more careful doing it (closer stops, faster scratching if the market moves against my set ups and positions).  However I know I would be more successful at building my account balance in the long term if I did just wait for the more likely ones...

To be clear, using the current EURUSD trade idea as an example, my overarching assessment rules on high likelihood of success comes from identifying the prevailing long term trend (that should resonate @TrendFollower) and having macro fundamentals supporting.  The fact that my Long EURUSD clearly goes counter to the prevailing trend and my fundamental view that the Euro is set for oblivion and USD is set for a strong rally makes it higher risk.  I counter this by having close stops and only entering a Long trade when all my criteria are met.  I also take far fewer and lower outlay positions on such retrace trades.  This is all about both risk and money management and both are important but to me Risk assessment and management is absolutely central to my methodology (and not just in trading either...).  I would not be flirting with EURUSD Longs if there were other better options in the market right now but I can't see any just yet.

I would be better off if I waited patiently for EURUSD to retrace and take the Shorts, but hey what is life without a little (little) risk?

Happy trading!

Link to comment
  • 1 year later...

Risk management would be more so the trade / position sizing. Making sure you are adhering to your maximum risk (1%, 1.5% etc) per trade, and making sure your reward to risk ratio is as it should be for your strategy and position.

money management would be capital preservation, accumulated risk, locating the stop position and trade management regardless of a long term or short term position. Accumulated risk is down to personal preference and your risk appetite, you may be comfortable with 6% or 8% etc. 

You should locate your stop by working out at which point your trade idea becomes ‘wrong’ meaning once the trade has hit your stop, this should be confirmation that this particular idea was in fact wrong and it will be consistent with your beliefs that the trade idea was wrong. 

you should also have a major and minor key level protecting your stop if possible, to increase the probability of your target being hit regardless of temporary drawdown. 

trade management In terms of manually trailing the trade, you could use (depending on your strategy) a 1hr or 4hr 50 EMA, and trial the 50 EMA with your stop, ensuring you always have that protective barrier, also if the markets do break the EMA and stop you out then that is consistent with the markets trend changing and the trade becoming ‘wrong’ at the point of being stopped out.  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • DOW JONES - DJI Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge Day Chart DOW JONES - DJI Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Orange Wave 2 Position: Navy Blue Wave 5 Direction Next Higher Degrees: Orange Wave 3 Details: The Elliott Wave analysis on the Dow Jones (DJI) daily chart indicates a counter-trend move within a corrective wave structure. This phase highlights Orange Wave 2, marking a corrective stage after the completion of the prior impulsive Orange Wave 1. Currently positioned within Navy Blue Wave 5, this phase suggests that Wave 2 is underway, creating a temporary pause or retracement within the broader upward trend. The next projected phase, Orange Wave 3, is anticipated to continue the primary trend upwards once Orange Wave 2 completes. According to Elliott Wave Theory, such corrective phases—like Orange Wave 2—serve as consolidation or pullback opportunities, establishing a foundation before resuming the main trend direction. An invalidation level is set at 38,531.48, marking a critical threshold for this wave structure. Should the price action fall below this level, it would invalidate the current wave pattern and potentially indicate a shift from the expected corrective wave. However, as long as the price remains above this threshold, the wave count is valid, suggesting a likely continuation into Orange Wave 3 upon Orange Wave 2’s completion. This setup implies that once Orange Wave 2 ends, the primary trend should resume upward, aligning with the anticipated progression into Orange Wave 3. The current wave count supports a bullish outlook beyond this corrective stage, provided the invalidation level is maintained. This structure points to a temporary pause before the market may continue its upward trend, completing the transition into the impulsive structure anticipated with Orange Wave 3.   DOW JONES - DJI Elliott Wave Analysis Trading Lounge Weekly Chart DOW JONES - DJI Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Orange Wave 2 Position: Navy Blue Wave 5 Direction Next Higher Degrees: Orange Wave 3 Details: The weekly Elliott Wave analysis of the Dow Jones (DJI) reveals a counter-trend corrective phase within Orange Wave 2. This stage follows the completion of Orange Wave 1, signaling a temporary retracement within the ongoing upward trend. Positioned within Navy Blue Wave 5, this wave reflects that Orange Wave 2 is currently active, representing a correction within the larger trend. Upon completion of Orange Wave 2, expectations are set for the index to transition into Orange Wave 3, resuming the primary bullish trajectory. This anticipated Wave 3 suggests an upward move after the corrective retracement of Wave 2. In Elliott Wave Theory, corrective waves like Orange Wave 2 often act as consolidation periods, allowing the market to build momentum before resuming its advance. The invalidation level for this wave structure is established at 38,531.48. Should prices dip below this level, it would invalidate the current wave count and potentially indicate a shift in the expected movement. However, as long as prices remain above this threshold, the structure supports the forecast of a continuation into Orange Wave 3 following Orange Wave 2's conclusion. This level serves as a checkpoint to affirm the wave count and the market's overall direction, sustaining the integrity of the projected corrective and impulsive phases. In summary, this analysis highlights a temporary corrective phase within the broader upward trend. Orange Wave 2 marks a pause before the likely progression into the impulsive Orange Wave 3. This corrective structure provides the market with an opportunity to stabilize before resuming its upward trajectory, assuming prices stay above the invalidation level. Overall, the wave setup maintains a bullish outlook for the longer term, with the market expected to transition back into the primary trend upon completing this correction. Technical Analyst : Malik Awais Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!  
    • A new GameFi token called Legend of Arcadia is trending, bringing together the best of traditional gameplay and Web3 GameFi 2.0 elements. This multi-chain, free-to-play, play-to-earn strategy card game emphasizes an immersive experience with deep strategic elements, allowing players to assemble and upgrade unique character cards, each with distinct abilities.   Set in a rich fantasy world, players engage in strategic battles, complete quests, and earn in-game assets, including NFTs. Beyond gameplay, Legend of Arcadia offers multiple income streams, enabling players to increase yields through staking, battling, and mining.   The token generation event is scheduled for today, and the token will be available on Bitget’s PoolX. I believe this game is promising new entry into the GameFi space, accessible for both traditional gamers and crypto enthusiasts.
    • USDCHF Elliott Wave Analysis - Trading Lounge U.S. Dollar / Swiss Franc (USDCHF) - Day Chart USDCHF Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Navy Blue Wave 2 Position: Gray Wave 3 Next Higher Degree Direction: Navy Blue Wave 3 Details: Navy Blue Wave 1 is complete; Navy Blue Wave 2 is currently in progress. Wave Invalidation Level: 0.83765 The USDCHF daily chart's Elliott Wave analysis highlights a counter-trend corrective structure, centering on Navy Blue Wave 2, which follows the completion of the preceding impulsive Navy Blue Wave 1. This corrective phase, Wave 2, signals a temporary consolidation or retracement within the larger trend. Positioned within Gray Wave 3, this movement suggests a pullback that allows for market adjustment before the anticipated trend resumption. According to Elliott Wave theory, corrective waves like Navy Blue Wave 2 typically offer brief counter-movements against the primary trend, presenting a pause or retracement. Upon concluding, the primary trend is likely to continue with Navy Blue Wave 3, indicating further upward momentum in line with the direction established in Wave 1. The wave cancel level is crucially set at 0.83765. A price movement below this threshold would invalidate the current wave structure, possibly indicating a deviation from the anticipated pattern. Sustaining price action above this level maintains the integrity of the corrective wave and the transition into the expected Navy Blue Wave 3, aligning with the broader bullish trend. This analysis underscores the significance of Navy Blue Wave 2 in preparing for the next phase. Should this corrective phase resolve without breaching the invalidation level, it opens the potential for the next impulsive wave, consistent with the higher-degree Navy Blue Wave 3. This setup hints at a bullish outlook post-consolidation, contingent on validation at the key wave cancel level.   U.S. Dollar / Swiss Franc (USDCHF) - 4-Hour Chart USDCHF Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Navy Blue Wave 2 Position: Gray Wave 3 Next Higher Degree Direction: Navy Blue Wave 3 Details: Navy Blue Wave 1 is completed; Navy Blue Wave 2 is currently active. Wave Invalidation Level: 0.83765 The USDCHF 4-hour chart Elliott Wave analysis reveals a counter-trend corrective pattern, with Navy Blue Wave 2 actively unfolding after the completion of Navy Blue Wave 1. This structure suggests a period of consolidation that may precede a resumption of the primary trend in the upcoming wave phase. Gray Wave 3 is nested within this corrective Navy Blue Wave 2, indicating a potential pullback or sideways price movement typical of corrective phases. Elliott Wave theory posits that such corrective waves counterbalance the dominant trend, offering a period of retracement or consolidation that sets the stage for the next impulsive move. The next higher degree move is projected as Navy Blue Wave 3, expected to resume the primary trend upon the conclusion of this corrective phase. This shift would likely align with the upward direction seen in Navy Blue Wave 1, implying that Navy Blue Wave 2 is a preparatory phase leading into further trend continuation. The wave cancel level, defined at 0.83765, serves as a key threshold for the current wave count. Should the price drop below this level, it would invalidate the current structure and may indicate a divergence from the projected wave pattern. Maintaining price above this level supports the validity of Navy Blue Wave 2 and sets up for a continuation into Navy Blue Wave 3, suggesting further potential upside following this corrective phase. Technical Analyst : Malik Awais Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!  
×
×
  • Create New...
us