Jump to content

Forced closing of remaining crypto balances, and margin increases to 100%


Recommended Posts

Guest Steve P

I have asked IG to explain why I have to now close my positions when they had already confirmed back in Jan if I had bets already open then they can continue to be open. 

Link to comment

I’ve seen a post on here stating that IG intend on removing around 1100 stocks from their platform. I’ve had a long position open for sometime which I suspect will be one of the stocks that is removed. I don’t understand if we make a contractual bet with the broker, how can they just close it when they lose. If we lose, we have to pay out. 
 

looking for advice and experience from people who’ve been doing this a while, whilst I do more research into how (if) I can keep my position open. Thanks..

Link to comment

Basically they reserve the right to close at the current price, if you are winning you can keep your gains but you can't gain any more. The only way to keep our positions is to go to another broker and buy the real stock, not a CFD.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Ben1LIT said:

I’ve seen a post on here stating that IG intend on removing around 1100 stocks from their platform. I’ve had a long position open for sometime which I suspect will be one of the stocks that is removed. I don’t understand if we make a contractual bet with the broker, how can they just close it when they lose. If we lose, we have to pay out. 
 

looking for advice and experience from people who’ve been doing this a while, whilst I do more research into how (if) I can keep my position open. Thanks..

 

Hopeless

We, retails losing money on a daily basis, being always in a disadvantaged position compaired with a broker... and for once, we manage to bet on the right direction, actually getting few bucks back from all our losses, and we are all forced to close down our poor wins. So typical ''of-course-you-will-die-poor'' behavior

Could somebody PLEASE at least help, write or link the list with the 1100 assets that we're not allowed to trade anymore?

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
2 hours ago, DarielRiera said:

 

Hopeless

We, retails losing money on a daily basis, being always in a disadvantaged position compaired with a broker... and for once, we manage to bet on the right direction, actually getting few bucks back from all our losses, and we are all forced to close down our poor wins. So typical ''of-course-you-will-die-poor'' behavior

Could somebody PLEASE at least help, write or link the list with the 1100 assets that we're not allowed to trade anymore?

Thanks in advance

Hey, 

As soon as I get a full list I will post it in this forum. As mentioned I will be passing all the feedback you're giving to senior members of staff in hope that if does shape the decisions we're making. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Ianp 

I totally agree. Having just recently told us that we could keep open positions until "we are ready to close them" this is a pretty poor turnaround. Disgraceful!  I have been with IG for more than twenty years and will be looking elsewhere in future.

Link to comment

Thanks Guys.  Yes, I got the same e-mail.  Really frustrating, and out of the blue.  Poor, poor show.   Can I just asked a technical question please ?  Is it right that currently, for Crypto IG provide 50% so basically the new margin requirement will be double the existing ??  Thanks, Spl183 

Link to comment

just plain unethical, regardless of their T&Cs - if you have CFDs running at a loss you're forced to take the hit.  No different to buying a car and then 6 months down the road the seller wants the motor back.  No problem denying new entrants if IGs exposure gets too risky, but surely they should honour the existing positions.

I have very small positions but they mean a lot to me.  Will look at Saxo and IB as I don't see them do the same thing to their clients as regularly as IG.

Link to comment
Guest Outraged

I would encourage all who are dissatisfied with this issue regarding forced closure of cryptocurrency positions or similar increase in margin requirements / forced closure of certain shares to formalise complaints in writing to compliance@ig.com as clients are entitled to do, explaining what actions you propose to take if they do not reconsider E.g. switching to another company, referring to Financial Ombudsman if complaints are not satisfactorily dealt with, seeking compensation etc. 

You may wish to refer to any previous correspondence such as the email on cryptocurrency positions sent on 4th January stating that " You can continue to open cryptocurrency trades as a retail client until 5 January 2021. After this, you’ll be able to hold any existing positions until you’re ready to close them, but you won’t be able to place new crypto trades. "

 

Also worth quoting FCA guidance:

 

  1. PS20/10: Prohibiting the sale to retail clients of investment products that reference cryptoassets

1.23 Retail consumers with existing holdings can remain invested following the prohibition, until they choose to disinvest. There is no time limit on this, and we do not require or expect firms to close out retail consumers’ positions unless consumers ask for this.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • What’s the average spread like, generally? How does it compare to current conditions? I’ve been using IG for over a decade, and I’ve noticed a growing sense of dissatisfaction, not just from myself but across various forums too. I think they really need to prioritize some core areas—like improving the iOS app and refining the API. While your issue may not be directly tied to the API, in theory, if you know how to use it well, it should offer a better experience compared to the web platform or the standard retail charts. Just my two cents. As for the problem, it’s definitely not about liquidity in these markets. I’d say it’s more likely due to the rise of algorithmic trading over the years. These high-speed algorithms can take advantage of price movements, often leading to short periods of slippage for regular traders as prices shift rapidly. Market orders, meant to execute quickly at the best available price, are more prone to slippage compared to limit orders. Since market orders prioritize speed, they don’t guarantee a specific price. If the market price changes in the short moment between when you place the order and when it's actually executed, your trade will go through at the new price, whether it’s better or worse than expected. This makes market orders riskier in fast-moving or volatile markets. By using the API along with a low-latency server, you can reduce the risk of slippage in some cases. What kind of latency are you experiencing with the API? Avoid using a home connection for this—opt for an affordable VPS, even a $5 one will significantly improve your experience.
    • Cardano’s 3.8% price surge might be from all the updates and partnerships they’ve been rolling out lately. I’ve noticed that every time they release some big news, like a new upgrade or collaboration, there’s always a jump in price. The community around Cardano is really strong too, which seems to play a role in driving things. A few weeks back, I swapped some tokens using https://stealthex.io , and I remember seeing a bunch of people talking about Cardano on forums. Maybe that hype is finally showing in the price. Either way, it’s nice to see some action in the market again.
    • Hi everyone, just a short post at this stage as I want to see if there is any interest in this topic first.  I’ll likely contact IG but wanted to see if there are other thoughts and experiences first as there are several issues I am seeing and it’s a bit complicated, so didn’t want to write some long rambling post. i trade the Dax and Nasdaq indices and use an automated strategy using the API.  I am effectively trying to do a trend trading strategy but on short timescales.  So i set fairly tight stops and then run those trades that leave the area to the plus side.  My win rate is low so have a lot of losers so slippage on stops is quite important to me. i have a database of trades and 5m data going back over 3years now - so have a lot of data to work with. i measured the stop slippage several years ago and it was fine for this method but have re measured it recently as I noticed the losing trades were a bit too large and it seems that the slippage has increased quite a lot for Nasdaq (not then Dax). I am trying to see what is behind this. Anyone interested or tackling similar issues? Thanks David 
×
×
  • Create New...
us