Jump to content

JC vows to make Britain a socialist state


Recommended Posts

ūüĎć

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-election-corbyn/offering-real-change-labours-corbyn-vows-to-oust-conservatives-idUKKBN1XA1WK

 

The question is, do you think the international financial elite will let him even if he does get into power?  Would they allow a run on the pound, capital flight and a major humanitarian catastrophe on Britain, like they do on countries like Venezuela?

Edited by dmedin
Link to comment
14 hours ago, dmedin said:

ūüĎć

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-election-corbyn/offering-real-change-labours-corbyn-vows-to-oust-conservatives-idUKKBN1XA1WK

 

The question is, do you think the international financial elite will let him even if he does get into power?  Would they allow a run on the pound, capital flight and a major humanitarian catastrophe on Britain, like they do on countries like Venezuela?

Should the US be putting 'boots on the ground' in the event of a JC win?¬†ūüė•

  • Great! 1
Link to comment

Is China a 'Marxist' country?  I believe China has repressed Marxist protests quite recently.  Incidentally Marx's 'Capital' volume 1 is very good, I have studied it myself with some aids and it has also been recommended by the FT!

China has moved from being "moderately unequal in 1990 to being one of the world's most unequal countries," according to a 2018 report by the International Monetary Fund.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-50258307

 

It would be grand if Britain were more like Scandinavia and less like America, but we all know why that will never happen - cough south east of England cough.

Edited by dmedin
Link to comment
18 hours ago, dmedin said:

ūüĎć

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-election-corbyn/offering-real-change-labours-corbyn-vows-to-oust-conservatives-idUKKBN1XA1WK

 

The question is, do you think the international financial elite will let him even if he does get into power?  Would they allow a run on the pound, capital flight and a major humanitarian catastrophe on Britain, like they do on countries like Venezuela?

Hey @dmedin, 

Thanks for making this post. We will have some content coming out this afternoon regarding Brexit. 

I will make sure to post something in this Discussion to hopefully bring some more opinions in :) 

Link to comment

Interesting article: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-election-spending/britain-set-for-1970s-public-spending-levels-as-parties-woo-voters-report-idUKKBN1XE01D

 

Even the Conservatives are promising to spend lots of money (I suppose there are people gullible enough to believe them).

Article notes that the UK has lower government spending as a percentage of GDP than Germany and France.  Yet both of those countries have a higher overall standard of living than the UK.  Hmm ....

Link to comment

That's right.  Everyone is living beyond their means at present.  That is why government debt is so large.  In order to keep the gravy train rolling the politicos (of all stripes) promise the moon to buy the plebs off and stay in power.  They have to pay for it via money printing (debt creation) because their economies are not balanced and the tax take is down.  This is why Blair promoted immigration (more consumers, more tax take to keep his New Labour bandwagon going and stay in power).   Industry is getting sold off in the UK (e.g. Cadbury) therefore the tax take is down and also because they can't get tax from the predominantly US based internet companies (hence France attempts to change the rules unilaterally, hence the trade wars that Trump is pushing).  Personal taxation rates (typically via indirects) have climbed steadily to offset the tax take loss from corporates while all parties compete in a race to the bottom by seeking to take large groups of lower paid people out of the tax net altogether (like that is actually a good idea!) which results in the middle class squeeze the MSM keeps harping on about.  BTW, because of the decimation of hard industry the middle class is now huge but a high proportion of them are not well paid. 

Germany (and to a lesser extent France and Austria) is, at present, actually in a better position than most because of their extensive and powerful manufacturing base and associated positive balance of payments.  Of course they achieved this via an effective Deutchmark devaluation via the Euro and in the process screwed the poorer countries like Greece and Portugal; the quid pro quo being infrastructure projects.  However Germany is in a manufacturing recession (which for Germany means a recession) and the alternative parties are on the rise (Merkel has, what, about 35% of the vote?).  The German people don't want to pay out their hard won surplus to bail out the Greeks et al...  They have a bloated social policy regime to maintain after all...

But don't worry.  In the UK at least Corbyn will fix everything...  Err not for the much squeezed middle class he wont.  The battle ground in the election is the middle class swing voters.  Watch BoJo focus all his policy on them, plus the anti democratic referendum reversal agenda.  He has already assumed he wont get any joy in Scotland, hence the "no Indyref2 policy".

Battle lines are drawn, it is not just about Brexit, it is about the Union, and whether the British really want a marxist revolutionary in the driving seat or not.  Corbyn has already come out talking about "going after" various groups (mostly fictitious but it plays well to his base), which is pure Marxist revolutionary rethorice and designed to polarise the country not bring it together (the irony is that Corbyn himself is anti EU but his party is split on this issue).  Turns out the UK didn't need Brexit to have decisive politics, they just needed the socialist momentum movement.  If Corbyn wins one of the saving graces for the UK economy, in or out of the EU but especially out of it, is that the UK is still seen as a safe haven for assets in an increasingly troubling world.  A Corbyn led Marxist government blows that out of the water.  Never mind the question as to whether the so-called elites will allow this, will the people of Britain?

I guess we will know in a few weeks.  What are the odds on a hung Parliament and all hell breaking lose with everything unresolved.

  • Thought provoking 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
      21,176
    • Total Posts
      90,698
    • Total Members
      41,282
    • Most Online
      7,522
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    CFDBandit
    Joined 29/01/23 03:20
  • Posts

    • Capital, win loss ratio. If you have a trading edge and you can consistently win 50% of your trades, so your winning 5 trades out of 10. So if your risking 1% of your capital per trade, out of your 10 trades 5 would be losers, so that‚Äôs 5% loss and realistically out of the 5 winning trades, some would make small profits, some break even and 1, 2 or 3 could run nicely IF you can let your profits run, basically your making money out of 2 trades out of the 10 trades (80/20 Rule Pareto principle) So a $20,000 acct risking 1% is $200 per trade, this will keep the trader with his trade risk based on being able to win 50% of his trades. A long term trend trader can win with 30% wining trade. Basically you need to know your numbers. Rgds Pete
    • Investing in stocks can be a great way to grow your wealth over time. However, there are different approaches that investors can take when choosing which stocks to buy. Two of the most popular approaches are growth investing and value investing. Growth Investing Growth investing is an investment strategy that focuses on buying stocks of companies that are expected to grow at a faster rate than the overall market. These companies are often in industries that are growing quickly, such as technology or healthcare. Investors who use this approach believe that these companies will be able to generate higher profits in the future, which will lead to higher stock prices. One of the main advantages of growth investing is that it can potentially provide higher returns than the overall market. However, it is also riskier than other investment strategies, as these companies often have higher valuations and more volatile stock prices. Value Investing Value investing is an investment strategy that focuses on buying stocks of companies that are undervalued by the market. These companies may be in industries that are out of favour or have recently experienced challenges, but they have strong fundamentals and a history of profitability. Investors who use this approach believe that these companies are undervalued and that their true value will be recognized in the future, leading to higher stock prices. One of the main advantages of value investing is that it can potentially provide lower risk than growth investing. However, it may also provide lower returns in the long run, as these companies may not have the same growth potential as companies in the growth investing category. Comparing Growth and Value Investing Growth and value investing are two different approaches to stock investing, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Growth investing can potentially provide higher returns but is riskier, while value investing can provide lower risk but potentially lower returns. An investor may choose one approach or a combination of both. A portfolio that contains a mix of growth and value stocks can provide a balance of potential returns and risk. Conclusion Both growth investing and value investing can be effective ways to invest in stocks. The key is to understand the potential risks and rewards of each approach and to choose the one that aligns with your investment goals and risk tolerance. Analyst Peter Mathers TradingLounge‚ĄĘ¬†
    • I am a beginner, and I must say, there are a lot of rules to the trading game that one must abide by if they want to be successful.¬† ¬†Here, the writer mentions several basic rules for day vs swing trading.¬† However, I find that often times, the reasoning for these rules is not as¬† obvious for a beginner as it may be for an expert.¬† ¬†The 'why' factor if I may. For example, why must you have a large capital to trade with as a day trader? Because your positions must be large so that a small change in price will be augmented and turned into a large profit. Also, with such high risk, the margin will be specially high, given the trader is taking up large positions at a time.¬† Without a large amount of capital, positions may be forced to close due to funds being below margin requirements.¬† When this happens, you can expect to lose tons of cash, fast.¬† I learned the hard way. All the best, David Franco ¬† ¬† ¬†
×
×
  • Create New...