Jump to content

Buy and hold for long term


Recommended Posts

Hi there just quick question i am about to buy shares i know which company's i am investing in.

I am investing for the first time don't want to make mistake by selecting wrong button if anyone can guide me when i am on the BUY AND SELL shares page simply what button should i use for buying and hold shares for long time? Thankyou

  

Link to comment
6 hours ago, TrendFollower said:

@Karamat,

It is good that you know which companies shares you are about to invest in. 

It is also good that you are investing before you are trading. Do you have an investment plan and investment strategy? If not then I would strongly urge you to think about having one.

I do not use IG's shares account as my shares are held with Hargreaves Lansdown. However, I assume once you have bought (BUY), you simply do nothing. This would meaning you are holding the shares as long as you do not (SELL). There would be no 'button' for holding. You simply buy and then do not sell which is the equivalent of holding. 

Please do consider looking into and researching in regards to a 'Investment Plan' and 'Investment Strategy'.  

Have a look at the following from IG:

How to start investing: what are the best ways to invest money?

https://www.ig.com/uk/investments/news/investing/2019/06/19/how-to-start-investing--what-are-the-best-ways-to-invest-money-

Investment strategies: how to research shares

https://www.ig.com/uk/investments/education/2019/04/03/investment-strategies--how-to-research-shares

Hi, Thank you so much for your help and sending me links about investment plan and strategy you are really helpful

Thanks again.

 

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 19/04/2020 at 09:21, Karamat said:

Hi there just quick question i am about to buy shares i know which company's i am investing in.

I am investing for the first time don't want to make mistake by selecting wrong button if anyone can guide me when i am on the BUY AND SELL shares page simply what button should i use for buying and hold shares for long time? Thankyou

  

Hello 

I only just read this so may be you have this sorted. However when you use the trade option you are presented with BUY and SELL boxes which are actually select buttons. 

I am puzzled myself about some features on IG such as their coloured circles. It would be helpful if IG had a FAQ to solve these issues as it is in their interests that you trade. 

I would like to see wben forms being able to be completed online as IG know your details although you can only sign digitally. That's more of an issue with the US Securities oversight though. 

I have found customer support very helpful though. 

Any way don't worry about clicking the wrong box you will get a preview for you to double check your order. 

Then the order sits waiting either for your price to be accepted or an available agent. You can check this under the trades > options menu items. 

 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Kilroywosear said:

I would like to see wben forms being able to be completed online as IG know your details although you can only sign digitally. That's more of an issue with the US Securities oversight though. 

Hi, the W8-BEN is available to be filled out online from your My IG web page > Settings > Trade US markets.

Which 'coloured circles' did you mean?

Link to comment
11 hours ago, JPoynton said:

But if you are 'holding' open positions, don't you get hit with the Quarterly Fee (AUD$50 for me) which is a major consideration I wish that I had known about 😒

Yes you are right and that's about 27.55 euros for me its too much im also considering different options. I might not go with this option. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, Fletch said:

Bear in mind that the quarterly fee is waived if you make three trades during the quarter. 

Which is fine ... but in the current economic climate, with many people off work due to Covid-19, 3 trades might not be feasible - I had hoped that IG may waive this condition until things improve ... but apparently not 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, JPoynton said:

@CharlotteIG Can you advise if IG is considering any reduction in fees due to COVID-19

 

4 hours ago, TrendFollower said:

@JPoynton,

May I ask why you think IG would consider offering any reduction in fees due to COVID-19? I am not saying they should or should not. I am just intrigued. 

Trading or using IG's platform is a choice which is not forced upon the client/customer. If IG's clients/customers are struggling financially, have lost their jobs or their incomes have declined then they really should not be trading in my view unless they are 'experienced / professional / consistently profitable' traders. Those people would not necessarily require a reduction in fees.

Hi, @JPoynton, a perfectly reasonable question and no reason why you shouldn't ask.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, TrendFollower said:

@JPoynton,

...If IG's clients/customers are struggling financially, have lost their jobs or their incomes have declined then they really should not be trading ...

Precisely my point
- Due to a complete stop in income I was only able to make 2 trades for the 1st Qtr of this year - I am holding 3 x positions in ETFs that are long-term holds - so was hit with the $50 fee
- I have no doubt that currently I won't be adding these positions is this Qtr so will incur the fee again

I cannot see how you feel this is warranted - I am being charged for NOT trading which is what you are saying I should not be doing!

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Fletch said:

Bear in mind that the quarterly fee is waived if you make three trades during the quarter. 

The whole point of buy and hold is that you do not trade frequently (for some people three times a quarter is frequent) - taking fees off you if you don't trade frequently isn't acceptable - one of the reasons why I don't use share dealing :(

 

Edited by dmedin
  • Like 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, TrendFollower said:

@JPoynton,

I did not state it was not a reasonable question, I was merely intrigued by your question. I also did not state that it should not be asked. If I have inferred that please do tell me where. 

I have shared live trades here on the IG Community and yes one was profitable and the other was a loss but share I did. I am not sure how many others have shared live trades on IG Community. 

I do not appreciate lies being spread as this can influence others on the IG Community. I am an investor first and trader second. My core foundation is as an investor. I supplement this with trading. 

Lies, no it's all on the forum for anyone to read. 

Early on you used to tell us about your commodity trading which was great fun until some spoil sport pointed out you clearly didn't understand how the platform worked and couldn't have been making any trades at all so that put a stop to that.

We remember well the 2 trades you shared live when at the end of December 2018 you jumped in FOMO no plan nothing just in time for price to suddenly reverse and you had to drag yourself out in a panic, great fun. An old trader read this and specifically joined the forum just to warn others not to ever do what you had just done, oh how we laughed. 

I think your main actions here though are of someone who perpetually makes formal complaints against other forum users. I lost count of the number of complaints you made against me to JamesIG and you've already made at least 2 that I know of to CharlotteIG and she's only been here a few months. 

Carry on.

  • Great! 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
44 minutes ago, dmedin said:

The whole point of buy and hold is that you do not trade frequently (for some people three times a quarter is frequent) - taking fees off you if you don't trade frequently isn't acceptable - one of the reasons why I don't use share dealing :(

 

Whether you trade frequently or not as an investor depends largely on your strategy. It may be true that you don't trade frequently, but it 'aint necessarily true. I largely adopt a drip strategy to investment (and especially so at the moment). However, irrespective of that, you'll find pretty much all brokers will charge some form of admin fee on top of trade commissions. Others will charge an inactivity fee. Some brokers will even charge both (and considerably more than IG charge). I'm not against people asking for the fees to be reduced, but ultimately when it comes to fees, IG are already at the cheaper end of the market. As to whether or not fees should be charged if you are not trading - you can make that argument, but equally IG can argue that they are giving you an ongoing service by holding your shares and administering dividend payments.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Fletch said:

IG are already at the cheaper end of the market

Yikes, they've all had it too easy for too long.  The computational/resource/administrative requirements of dealing with an individual's shares, even if they have thousands of them, is infinitesimal in the age of big data.

  • Thought provoking 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, dmedin said:

Yikes, they've all had it too easy for too long.  The computational/resource/administrative requirements of dealing with an individual's shares, even if they have thousands of them, is infinitesimal in the age of big data.

Yeh, especially when you're not the one that's paying for it. 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Fletch said:

Yeh, especially when you're not the one that's paying for it. 

Lol no chance, it's literally pennies for gigabytes at scale.

£50 a year for admin charges tops, unless you're a 'big boy'.

Link to comment

You think it's only about data? What is that data stored on? What does it cost to run? What does it cost to maintain? What does it cost to house securely? What does it cost to meet the regulations surrounding holding that data? What does it cost to employ people to answer queries relating to that data? The list goes on...

Yet, clearly, it can be done more cheaply as 'free' trading services wouldn't exist if it couldn't. But those services are usually only free if you trade within the set limitations. Any extras will come at a cost. Ultimately, you choose your model and you pay your price. The competition isn't currently strong enough to stop IG shrugging its cash-laden shoulders and telling you to go elsewhere if you think the grass is greener.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
21 minutes ago, Fletch said:

You think it's only about data? What is that data stored on? What does it cost to run? What does it cost to maintain? What does it cost to house securely? What does it cost to meet the regulations surrounding holding that data? What does it cost to employ people to answer queries relating to that data? The list goes on...

 

 

And it's my responsibility to feed and clothe all these fat-cat intermediaries, why?  :D

I don't even have the right to vote at AGMs and IG can force me to sell my shares.  So I don't really 'own' them.  Ripoff!

Link to comment

Not really sure that the majority of people within that chain could in any way be described as 'fat cats', but irrespective, no it's not your responsibility. That's exactly it. If you don't like it, go find somewhere whose service level matches the price you are willing to pay for it. I would anticipate that's what everybody would (or should) do whenever they entrust their money with a broker.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Fletch said:

Not really sure that the majority of people within that chain could in any way be described as 'fat cats',

 

 

Charging exorbitant fees is how people in the FS industry make their money, bub.

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, dmedin said:

They do seem to be the cheapest according to this comparison: https://uk.stockbrokers.com/compare

£96 a year - going to cut into your tiny drip of dividends :D 

Unfortunately, I suspect a 'tiny drip' of dividends will be somewhat of an exaggeration this year. Covid 19 has been an excellent excuse for many (though not all) of the real 'fat cats' to wriggle out of paying anything back. As to being the cheapest, yes I already know - I reviewed providers before joining. IG probably makes the bulk of its money from failed CFD traders rather than share dealing accounts.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, JPoynton said:

@CharlotteIG Can you advise if IG is considering any reduction in fees due to COVID-19

@JPoynton 

thanks for your post. There have not been talks of reducing the fees however I have passed this on as feedback as someone else mentioned it before. Unfortunately, these aren't decisions I can make but if this is passed on my myself and the client facing team it will be discussed. 

If I hear of any news on this I will let you know. 

All the best 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • image.png

  • Posts

    • Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge Daily Chart, 26 February 24, AAVE/ U.S. dollar(AAVEUSD) AAVEUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Zigzag Position: Wave ((B)) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave II of Impulse Wave Cancel invalid Level: 47.34 AAVE/ U.S. dollar(AAVEUSD)Trading Strategy: Correction of wave 2 in the Zigzag pattern. Price is currently pulling back in wave B before falling again in wave C. The overall picture is still in an uptrend but is correcting to continue upward. AAVE/ U.S. dollar(AAVEUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is above the MA200 indicating an Uptrend, Wave Oscillatoris a bullish Momentum. TradingLounge Analyst: Kittiampon Somboonsod, CEWA Source : Tradinglounge.com get trial here!         Elliott Wave Analysis TradingLounge 4Hr Chart, 26 February 24, Bitcoin/ U.S. dollar(BTCUSD) AAVEUSD Elliott Wave Technical Analysis Function: Counter Trend Mode: Corrective Structure: Zigzag Position: Wave ((B)) Direction Next higher Degrees: Wave II of Impulse Wave Cancel invalid Level: 47.34 Bitcoin/ U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Trading Strategy: Correction of wave 2 in the Zigzag pattern. Price is currently pulling back in wave B before falling again in wave C. The overall picture is still in an uptrend but is correcting to continue upward. Bitcoin/ U.S. dollar(BTCUSD)Technical Indicators: The price is above the MA200 indicating an Uptrend, Wave Oscillators a bullish Momentum.    
    • Naturally after the debut of ERC 404, it was only natural that developers would begin to take advantage of its ability to bridges the gap between fungible (ERC-20) and non-fungible (ERC-721) tokens. One such project is the Dancing Beans ($BEANS) which allows fractional ownership of hilarious meme-inspired creatures NFTs on the blockchain. About a week ago I wrote about the exponential rise of Pandora to 20,000% plus in just five days setting the bar high for competition! I also spoke about other NFT projects like CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club but Dancing Beans brings a fresh twist with. While Focusing on fun and interactivity and community-driven approaches the Dancing Beans team is constantly listening to their fans and creating new experiences based on their feedback... For me though, the question is if Beans can follow the successful dancesteps of Pandora and make players, NFT collectors and investors dance about the figures in their wallets. With my fingers crossed, I'm inclined to hold the Beans I bought on Bitget after the recent listing and it has already gone up by 24%... What are your thoughts guys? Pandora style or nah?  
    • In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the intricate world of Elliott Wave analysis applied to the NASDAQ stock market, with a special focus on trading strategies for major tech stocks including NASDAQ 100, Apple (AAPL), Tesla (TSLA), Amazon (AMZN), Nvidia (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT), Meta Platforms (META), Netflix (NFLX), and Alphabet (GOOGL). Our latest analysis, following the close on Friday, reveals a subdued ending that aligns perfectly with the peak of Wave i), indicating a dip in short-term momentum. This scenario sets the stage for the formation of Wave (c) of ii), marking a pivotal moment for traders to gear up for the upcoming long trade setup across the indices and specific stocks discussed in our analysis. It's important to note, however, that Apple (AAPL) may stand as an exception in this trend. Currently, we are maintaining open long positions in several stocks, with the strategic goal of further building these positions into Wave iii) and beyond. Our strategy includes adding to and adjusting our entries for Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), and fine-tuning the entry point for Alphabet (GOOGL). The latter presents a heightened risk in the forthcoming trading session, warranting a cautious approach. This analysis not only provides insights into the expected movements based on Elliott Wave theory but also offers actionable trading strategies for investors looking to capitalize on these patterns. Stay tuned for continuous updates and strategic adjustments to maximize your trading outcomes in the dynamic NASDAQ market and its leading tech giants. Video Chapters 00:00  NASDAQ 100 (NDX) SP500, JPM 06:15  Apple (AAPL) 06:53 Amazon (AMZN) 08:19 Meta Platforms (META) 09:51 NVIDIA (NVDA) 10:29 Netflix (NFLX)  11:09 Alphabet (GOOGL) 12:33 Microsoft MSFT 14:13 Tesla (TSLA) 16:40 End Analyst Peter Mathers TradingLounge™ Australian Financial Services Licence - AFSL 317817 Source: tradinglounge.com  Join & Learn Elliott Wave from Experts Stay ahead of market movements and make informed decisions with our comprehensive analysis.    
×
×
  • Create New...
us