Jump to content

The Virus and the Economy

Recommended Posts

To answer the riddle from the last post.

The article points out the problem of the vaccines is that they give a vaccine immunity that concentrates on only one part of the virus not the whole virus, so vaccine immunity is centered on one aspect, the spike protein, but variation of the spike fools this limited immunity, the immune system no longer recognises it as the virus and so doesn't destroy it.

On the other hand natural immunity gained by catching and recovering from covid covers the entire virus and the immune system will recognise the whole thing and blast it whether there is a small change on the spike or not.

To solve this problem from happening first stop the vaccinations and then the vaxed and non-vaxed must be allowed to mix to even out the variants and so prevent super variants incubating in a select protected group, the exact opposite of what the powers that be are doing which is to encourage/enforce segregation. And with continued booster shots guarantee the production of ever stronger super variants.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment



Israel PM Naftali Bennett:
”The most vulnerable population at the moment…are the ones who received two vaccine doses but not the third…they walk around feeling like they are protected because they received both doses…must quickly get vaccinated with THE THIRD VACCINE DOSE…”




  • Sad 1
Link to comment


Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers

A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.

Study: Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers Carry 251 Times Viral Load, Pose Threat to Unvaccinated Patients, Co-Workers • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)

  • Sad 1
Link to comment

3 headlines from Fauci within 2 days, just going round in circles. These people in positions of power as well as the politicians are not incompetent or even confused, they're just making sure you are!


Daily Caller  @DailyCaller  1d  Dr. Fauci says that if the majority of Americans get vaccinated, covid-19 will be under control by the "spring of 2022"


Disclose.tv @disclosetv  23h  NEW - Dr. Fauci: "I respect people’s freedom, but when you’re talking about a public health crisis ... The time is come, enough is enough."


Fox News  @FoxNews  23h  Fauci says he misspoke on when he believes US could get COVID under control


Meanwhile in Australia,

Registered health practitioners in Australia have been notified that they are not permitted to say anything that’s “anti-vaccine” and will be prosecuted for doing so.







Edited by Caseynotes
  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Following Fauci showing off how he can talk gibberish with no come backs now here's Ferguson. Previously had estimated Sweden would suffer around 90,000 deaths if the didn't lock down which turned out to be a ridiculous over estimate. Now he's saying they would have had half the number of deaths they did if they had of locked down. 

Peers are queuing up to rubbish the blatant nonsense 'research paper' but it doesn't seem to matter, there will be no real come backs.

The CDC meanwhile has long been criticised for poor or late data releases but went one step further yesterday when they issued recommendations not based on data but based on ''hope'', really, beggars belief.

So the push is on to get everyone vaxed before more data comes out showing the vaccines to be not only useless but actually harmful.


''Wow. New Israeli preprint shows natural immunity to #SARSCoV2 is FAR superior to the artificial kind - vaccinated people were 13x as likely to be infected and 27x to have symptomatic infections as a matched cohort that was previously infected. And this is with Delta dominant.'' Alex Berenson  @AlexBerenson

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections | medRxiv


When Will Neil Ferguson Admit He Got it Wrong? – The Daily Sceptic





  • Sad 1
Link to comment

The NHS completely lost the plot quite sometime ago (as did the govt).


The Telegraph  @Telegraph 17m

EXCLUSIVE: The NHS has drawn up plans to start vaccinating 12-year-olds from the first week schools go back


Law-or-Fiction @laworfiction  7m

Local authorities and media are ignorant and/or lying when saying children can consent to the vaccine. ‘Gillick’ competence was identified specifically in circs of a single child at risk in absence of treatment. It was nothing to do with the govt usurping parental responsibility.


Philippe Lemoine @phl43

It's really amazing to watch people freak out about what SARS-CoV-2 might do to their kids even though RSV is actually far more dangerous for children and they have never spent a second of their life worrying about it.


  • Sad 1
Link to comment

This is just so seriously wrong, has everyone lost their minds? The entire covid debacle stinks to high heaven.

talkRADIO  @talkRADIO


The NHS has drawn up plans to vaccinate 12-year-olds at school without any need for parental consent. UsforThem founder Molly Kingsley: "I am flabbergasted by this. The issues are staggering. Why are we doing this? Why do these children need this?"


Meanwhile  ''The US pharma company is reportedly asking for military bases and sovereign assets as guarantee for vaccines.''


  • Sad 1
Link to comment

6 months ago in Israel:

It’s 95% effective, herd immunity is coming, everyone get two jabs & we will beat this virus.

Now in Israel:

It’s 39% effective, get your n'th booster shot or you’re losing your passport, - & vaccine herd immunity is probably mythical.



Israel 90% vaxed.

Egypt 3% vaxed.

Is this what success looks like?







  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Toby Young  @toadmeister

Boris Johnson is said to have devised a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether he should plunge the country into another lockdown, with just under 1,000 Covid deaths a week enough to warrant further restrictions.


BUT THIS 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇.

Neil Clark@NeilClark66

If Covid deaths continue to be defined as deaths coming within 28 days of a positive PCR test (& the tests are run at high cycles) this makes further lockdowns this winter more or less inevitable.


The criteria used to label a case, an admission, and a death as 'covid' has been a total nonsense from the start.

Reminder that during flu season you could come into contact with the flu virus multiple times a day but never get ill when you already have immunity.

But each contact would leave dead viral fragments that would give a positive flu test if the same testing criteria was applied to flu as is applied to covid. 

The tactic was deliberately employed as part of project Fear, there seems no going back.

You must have symptoms to have a disease, symptoms are the definition of a disease. 


Meanwhile in France, see reason number 2 for winter lockdowns, to protect a suddenly understaffed NHS thanks to Johnson's vax mandates.


FRANCE: healthcare workers burn their diploma and take off their whites in front of the Besançon hospital to protest against the mandatory Vax and the Vax Pass needed to access hospital services.


  • Sad 1
Link to comment


'The spike proteins in the vaccines ARE toxic'.

''This is a poisonous attack on our population and it needs to stop now.''

Lab work studies showing the damage being done by the vaccines in multiple sites throughout the body.

Reiterating too that the damage done to the heart by myocarditis and pericarditis especially in the young does not repair itself but becomes scar tissue for life.

(17 min)


Dr. Ryan Cole – Post Investigational Vaccine Deaths (bitchute.com)


  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Nothing about the covid story ever added up right from the beginning.

Why did the Chinese make and distribute fake video of people falling dead in the street.

Why did the WHO abandon their pandemic plan and adopt a new untested plan.

Why were lockdowns, masks and social distancing backed by lies.

Why was the PCR test run at such a high cycle threshold as to guarantee a very high ratio of false positive.

Why is there still no proper diagnostic test for covid-19.

How did this virus suddenly have a spike protein that causes vascular disease (clotting).

Why has no other  corona virus ever shown such a trait.

Why has no animal reservoir for the virus ever been found.

Why has everyone stopped looking.

Why were other treatments shown to have good result all blocked.

Why does the WHO now dismiss natural immunity and only promote vaccine immunity.

How did a computer modelled virus similar to the SAR-CoV2 virus appear in 2016.

Why was this model then distributed to select to vaccine makers.

Why the insistence on 100% vaccination when the average age of deaths is 82 and risk of serious adverse reactions in children is 5X the risk of covid.

Why are western govts building permanent quarantine camps when covid is seasonal like the flu and has a similar fatality rate.

Why are no investigative journalists asking any of these questions.

Why are there no politicians of any party asking any of these questions.


Perhaps politicians think this will make them the new super elite, they're in for a shock.

If you want to know who really benefits this 2 min vid sums it up well.



The holy grail of drug companies for the last 30 years has been a global population addicted to a vaccine (physically and psychologically) that must be upgraded and administered annually.


In this 1 hour interview below with Dr David Martin he discuss his ongoing search covering the last 30 years of the drug companies and affiliates and explains how we ended up here.

Fast paced and concise and a real eye opener to the games big pharma have been playing.


Vaccine Choice Canada Interviews Dr. David E. Martin on COVID Vaccines as Bioweapons (bitchute.com)



  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Yet another highly qualified Dr says the vax programme must be stopped. 

There is no covid 'original' that the vaxes were designed for around anymore and all the current dominant variants have evolved to escape detection.


Excellent fast paced factual vid (30 min). Very good summary of recent events plus important new material.

Top American doctor: COVID shots are 'obsolete,' dangerous, must be shut down (bitchute.com)


Adds some additional info one being that the main stream media companies and social media companies have signed a pledge to only distribute info endorsed by govt agencies such as the CDC.

But we know the CDC is woefully behind the curve (about 3 months), this would explain why everyone quoting the latest research papers out of Israel are being systematically deplatformed.

Investigative journalism is dead.



Noga Tarnopolsky  @NTarnopolsky


#Breaking: Israel no longer considers people who have received 2 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines "vaccinated." As of September 1, only 3x vaccinated are considered immune.


The final pieces of the jigsaw are falling into place, more to follow



  • Sad 1
Link to comment

The final pieces of the jigsaw are falling into place.

Last year we were told by Geert Borsch 'it's immunology 101 you don't start a mass vax programme in the middle of a pandemic' - because it will highly likely lead to vaccine ADE which decreases the natural immune system while pressure cooking the evolution of vaccine resistant super variants.

And that's exactly where we are today because that's exactly what the drug companies wanted.

In a linked vid posted earlier the 'holy grail' of the drug companies for the last 30 years has been to have the global population addicted (physically and psychologically) to a drug that needed to be upgraded and re-administered annually.

And now they have it. There is no longer any covid 'original' that the vaccines were designed to combat, all the current covids (variants) are all vaccine resistant.

Because of vaccine ADE the vaxed are the largest ratioed cohort being infected and hospitalised by the variants.

So the drug companies again come to the, er, 'rescue'.

Pfizer CEO says COVID19 vaccine-resistant variant likely to emerge, but the big pharma company would be able to turn around a "variant-specific" new mRNA jab within 3 months (Fox)

Not too long now before the vaxed demand vax passports (for everyone) to prove they're up to date (and you're not).

And this is where the drug company's 'holy grail' dovetails perfectly with the ruling elite's 'holy grail', a digital ID (incorporating vax status) that can track and record everything someone says and does and where they go and what they purchase. And therefore a non-violent means to control the population, prevent dissent, protest, conspiracy or any kind of undesirable behaviour whatsoever.

No wonder politicians are pushing so hard for 100% vaccinations.



  • Sad 1
Link to comment

'The WHO have published a long comprehensive document on implementation of digital IDs. It may the the longest publication from them in the last 18 months.'

haha, they're just trolling you at this point,

the WHO say ' there will be absolutely NO discrimination between ---- those presenting the ID on a smartphone app or on a paper card.'

So there, well that's a ******** relief  🤣

h/t  Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath

Digital documentation of COVID-19 certificates: vaccination status: technical specifications and implementation guidance, 27 August 2021 (who.int)



Meanwhile a well written article on the horrid covid saga to date (pub 30th Aug)

The Masked Ball of Cowardice - Tablet Magazine

''Mass lockdowns of entire countries as a technique for fighting disease sprung into the world’s consciousness on the order of Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), who fomented a global propaganda offensive targeting Western governments and media. ''


''In the U.K. Government’s official Coronavirus Action Plan from March 3, 2020, discussing social distancing, school closures, and rapid COVID test and vaccine development, nearly every source the U.K. government cited was from China.''

  • Sad 1
Link to comment

The WHO now pushing for digital IDs.

'WHO private sponsorship is relevant. Coercing vaccination, contrary to aspects of WHO's charter and the UN Human Rights Dec, would be a potential windfall for companies and investors who have now replaced country-based funding for much of WHOs work.' The Gates Foundation are the WHO's biggest private sponsor.

Meanwhile, German news firm Welt report;

''JUST IN - Corona not likely cause of death in 80 percent of official covid deaths reported in Germany since early July, according to Prof. Dr. Bertram Häussler, head of the independent health research institute IGES in Berlin (WELT)

That's what happens when you stop relying on the fraudulent PCR test to diagnose covid.

Meanwhile (2), death by ''a short illness'' is becoming more prevalent than death with covid. ??!!???



  • Sad 1
Link to comment

If you inject someone full of cloned covid spike proteins as are in the vaccines and then test them for covid they must test positive for covid if using the PCR test, they can't not.

The incident below is obviously an adverse reaction to the vaccine but everyone would rather call it covid instead.







  • Sad 1
Link to comment

There is obviously a sadistical push across western countries for 100% vaccinations in spite of the fact that at least half the population of each country having the far superior natural immunity.

The reason for the deliberate blind spot is because the actual goal is for everyone to be carrying a vaccine passport (incorporating their digital ID).

And the reason for that of course is so that the govt can control every minute of your day.

The Wall Street Journal
'China is cracking down on youth videogame addiction: No gaming during the school week and one hour a day on Fridays, weekends and public holidays.'



  • Sad 1
Link to comment

'Israel now has the highest current case rate in the entire world. Oddly, Israel was also the first country to vaccinate the majority of their population and the first country to vaccinate 80% of adults.'

PLC @Humble_Analysis

It's because the current covid strains are vaccine resistant. More (boosters) is not better. Unblock treatments that have been proven to actually work. Ivermectin, HCQ, monoclonal antibodies.


Meanwhile the CDC reveals masks don't work - about 9 months behind everyone else.

''CDC study: Masks Mandates Don’t Work.''

Took their time coming to the conclusion 'they made no significant difference'.

 ''The study analyzed some 90,000 elementary students in 169 Georgia schools from Nov. 16 to Dec. 11.''

CDC study: School mask mandates don't work (wnd.com)


And Trudeau revels the next phase of the great reset. Must be meaning lockdowns for climate control. Good job he's doing badly in the polls.


And finally, never in my entire life have I ever seen all western leaders be so completely orchestrated and in step as for the last 18 month during this covid debacle.

Who could possibly be behind it all? If only there was some clue. 


  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Govts keep increasing the pressure to  force the vax passports on everyone but it may well all backfire ... on you!


''Unelected health bureaucrats (Canada) announce that they’re going to fire every doctor, nurse and orderly without a vaccine. In other jurisdictions, that’s 25 to 30% of health staff. If you thought the lockdowns cancelled a lot of cancer surgeries, you ain’t seen nothing yet. '' Ezra Levant   @ezralevant





ONTARIO - Obese politician says vaccine passports are mandatory in social settings. To protect people like him who refuse to take personal responsibility for their own risk.

 I’m just telling it how it is.  Bernie's Tweets @BernieSpofforth

Edited by Caseynotes
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
On 27/08/2021 at 08:02, Caseynotes said:

Isolate - lockdown.
Confuse - mix truth and lies and constantly change plans and goals.
Fear - unremitting campaign of fear through a complicit media.

'Australian states start extending lockdowns in spite of announcements no longer going for 'zero covid'.'

Who could have possibly seen that coming?? (actually it's the same old bs we've all been put through for the last year and a half).

Melbourne Australia’s lockdown extended to at least Sept 23, but “children and parents rejoice at playgrounds reopening.” Only one adult may attend and they must scan a QR code upon entry to the playground. Removing one’s mask to eat or drink is forbidden.  Michael P Senger @MichaelPSenger

COVID Victoria: Children and parents rejoice at playgrounds reopening (theage.com.au)


Meanwhile vax passports hardliner Trudeau sees his popularity falling, forced to run away from demonstrators, glorious, and elections not far away.


  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • General Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      10/06/21 10:53

    Newest Member
    Joined 06/06/23 18:53
  • Posts

    • HI can anyone tell me when IG will publish CTC for the 2022/23 tax year please? Cheers
    • EUR/USD had a look lower but is treading water for now; while the ascending trend has been broken, it might resume and there are bullish bearish and perspectives for EUR/USD. Which will prevail?   Source: Bloomberg   Forex Shares EUR/USD Market trend Euro United States dollar Daniel McCarthy | Strategist, | Publication date: Tuesday 06 June 2023  EUR/USD has recovered from the 10-week low seen last week at 1.0635. This was only a fraction below the 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement of the move from 1.0516 to 1.1096 at 1.0640. This may see the 1.0635 – 40 area set up as a potential support zone ahead of the prior lows at 1.0525, 1.0516, 1.0483 and 1.0443. The longer-term 200- and 260-day simple moving averages (SMA) are in among the cluster of lows between 1.0443 to 1.0525 and might lend support. Since breaking below the trend line established from a series of lows seen between September and November last year, the price has remained below the 10-, 21-, 34, 55- and 100-day SMAs. This could suggest that short and medium-term bearish momentum might be intact. On the flip side, the price remains above the 200- and 260-day SMAs, which may suggest the underlying longer-term bullish trend is yet to be undone. A break above the trend line axis has the potential to reinstate the ascending trend. It currently dissects with the 34-day SMA near 1.0875. The 34-day SMA has just broken below the 55-day SMA, creating a Death Cross. Similarly, the 21-day SMA has also created a Death Cross by crossing below the 100-day SMA. A Death Cross is a potential signal for an evolving bearish trend. In April and May, a series of highs were seen in the 1.1075 – 95 area and this might offer a resistance zone. In the bigger picture, a clean take out of these levels may confirm the resumption of the ascending trend. These tops created an extension of a Double Top formation that heralded the sell-off last month. It should be noted though that past performance is not indicative of future results. The neckline from this formation is at 1.0942 and it might offer resistance. The price action on Monday saw a Spinning Top Candlestick emerge which may indicate indecision in the market for EUR/USD direction, potentially setting up a range trading type environment. As laid out above, there are mixed signals in EUR/USD for now. As always, sound risk management is the foundation for trading.   Source: TradingView This information has been prepared by DailyFX, the partner site of IG offering leading forex news and analysis. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients.
    • Beginners' guide to fundamental analysis Use fundamental analysis to identify markets that are under- or over-priced, by looking at the economic and financial factors which affect their value. Learn about fundamental analysis and how to use it in your trading. Source: Bloomberg   Shares Fundamental analysis Investment Price Value investing Profit  Callum Cliffe | Financial writer, London What is fundamental analysis? Fundamental analysis is a means of measuring a company’s actual or ‘intrinsic’ value by assessing economic and financial factors, such as a balance sheet, macroeconomic indicators and management forecasts. Most companies’ share prices will not always reflect their intrinsic value, as market prices are driven by rational elements – such as a company’s ability to generate revenue and profits – as well as irrational factors, such as market sentiment towards a company and media perception. Fundamental analysis is used to estimate the intrinsic value of a stock, ignoring short-term trends and investor enthusiasm, to determine the true price that a company should be trading at. Once you know the intrinsic value of a stock, you can compare it to the market price. You’ll then be able to tell whether a company is undervalued or overvalued – giving you an indication of whether to buy or sell the asset. For example, if a stock was overpriced, it could decline at some point in the future and if the stock was undervalued, you could take a position early and profit if the market value changes to reflect the intrinsic value. Fundamental analysis vs technical analysis Technical analysis is concerned with the historical price movements of an asset. So, you’d need knowledge of chart patterns and what each pattern might mean for the future price movements of a stock. Learn about 16 candlestick patterns all traders should know Fundamental analysis, on the other hand, requires an in-depth knowledge of your chosen market and sector so that you can quickly and accurately identify viable companies based on news reports, financial statements or changes in company leadership.     Different types of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis’s primary goal is to estimate the intrinsic value of a company, or the value at which the price should tend to over time. This can be achieved using several methodologies, which are often divided in two categories: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative fundamental analysis methods look at a company’s viability as an investment in numerical metrics, such as profit and loss statements, cash flow statement and market share. A trader would use these metrics to assess how the company is being run, and whether it is capable of yielding a profit. It is with this analysis that the trader might decide to open or close a position, depending on how profitable they perceive the company to be. Then there’s qualitative fundamental analysis which assesses factors that affect the character or quality of the company, such as brand recognition, senior management or customer satisfaction. On the whole, fundamental analysis is focused on qualitative analysis. Popular qualitative analysis methods include: Top-down or bottom-up approach Porter’s five forces SWOT analysis Economic moats   Top-down or bottom-up approach To use a top-down approach, you’d look at global macroeconomic metrics – including gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment rates, inflation, and interest rates – to identify favourable countries and regions. Once the list is narrowed for the top performing countries, you’d identify stand-out industries within those economies, which will also involve analysis the number of companies, average net profit margin and price elasticity. Finally, you’d refine the remaining list to include only the best businesses in those sectors, in terms of price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, profit and loss and other metrics.     The bottom-up model follows an opposite filtering order, going from analysing individual companies and then widening your search to include relevant studies on the sector and country or region they are in.The bottom-up model follows an opposite filtering order, going from analysing individual companies and then widening your search to include relevant studies on the sector and country or region they are in. Porter’s five forces Michael Porter developed a framework that analyses the intensity of competition within an industry, which you can use to understand the likelihood of a company's long-term profitability. It is based on five key variables: Barriers to entry – the threats facing new companies, such as setting up costs Threat of substitution – how likely it is that a consumer could switch products easily Bargaining power of suppliers – the number of supplies available decreases the power of each supplier to make demands Bargaining power of customers – the high cost of switching supplier and low competition decreases the power of consumers who have few alternatives Competitive rivalry – intense rivalries can drive brand loyalty and encourage strategic concentration   SWOT analysis SWOT analysis is a method that’s focused on identifying a company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and any threats. Strengths and weaknesses are internal attributes of the organisation – such as talent or brand reputation – while opportunities and threats are based on the external environment, for example a country’s legislation or how fast the industry is growing. This type of analysis is designed to facilitate a purely fact-driven assessment of an organisation, avoiding any emotional and inaccurate decision making. It can help guide you toward businesses that are more likely to have long-term success in their industry.   Economic moats The term economic moats was first coined by Warren Buffett, as a way of describing a business´ ability to maintain a competitive advantage over its opponents over time. The metaphor of a medieval castle is used to solidify the idea of protecting a firm’s profits from outsiders. Investors should look for businesses that currently have, and will be able to maintain, a competitive advantage. This allows the company to outperform the market over the long term, and hopefully secure you a profit. The main ways of creating an economic moat are:   How to use fundamental analysis You can use fundamental analysis to identify buy and sell signals in the market of your choice. If your fundament analysis indicates the asset is undervalued compared to its intrinsic value, you could opt to buy the market – and if it was overvalued, you might see it as an opportunity to go short. The way you use fundamental analysis will depend on your style of investing and your trading goals.   Value investing Value investing seeks to identify potentially undervalued companies. Key metrics that are used include a low price-to-book or P/E ratio, economic moats and a high dividend yield. Value investors look to buy comparatively cheap companies with secure long-term prospects. Benjamin Graham is considered by many as the father of the value investing and wrote the iconic book ‘The Intelligent Investor’. He believed that in their search for undervalued companies, a value investor will prioritise the quality of the business over the market price. As summarised by Graham’s famous student, Warren Buffett, ‘It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price, than to buy a fair company at a wonderful price’. This investment style is generally intertwined with contrarian investing, as they both argue that going against the crowd or prevailing sentiment at the time (buy when everyone is selling, sell when everyone is buying) tends to offer positive rewards.   Growth investing Growth investing was developed by Thomas Price and popularised by Philip Fisher with his book ‘Common Stocks and Uncommon profits’. It focuses on companies with a high growth potential even if share price appears expensive in terms of metrics. Instead of investing in an already established company, the investor will take a risk on companies that have the potential to continue growing at a higher-than-average rate. Growth companies are found predominantly in the technology or pharma sectors.   GARP investing A growth at a reasonable price (GARP) strategy blends aspects of both value and growth investing, with investors seeking companies with exponential growth but at a competitive price. Popularised by investment manager Peter Lynch, and developed with his book ‘One Up on Wall Street’, it uses a financial ratio called price-to-earnings growth (PEG) as its main way to identify attractive companies. Once a company is analysed, it is divided into one of six different categories based on growth potential: slow, stalwart, fast, cyclicals, turnarounds and asset plays. A concrete metric is given to each, helping to identify growth shares that are trading at a reasonable price. Lynch also uses subjective criteria such as the customer’s satisfaction. As an example, he claims that his best investment in Taco Bell was driven by the fact that ‘he like their sandwiches’. Pros and cons of fundamental analysis Pros of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis helps traders and investors to gather the right information to make rational decisions about what position to take. By basing these decisions on financial data, there is limited room for personal biases. Rather than establishing entry and exit points, fundamental analysis seeks to understand the value of an asset, so that traders can take a much longer-term view of the market. Once the trader has determined a numerical value for the asset, they can compare it to the current market price to assess whether the asset is over- or under-valued. The aim is to then profit from the market correction. Cons of fundamental analysis Fundamental analysis can be time consuming, it requires multiple areas of analysis, which can make the process extremely complicated. As fundamental analysis takes a much longer-term view of the market, the results of the findings are not suitable for quick decisions. Traders looking to create a methodology for entering and exiting trades in the short term might be better suited to technical analysis. It is also important to consider the best and the worst-case scenario. While fundamental analysis provides a more well-rounded view of the market, it is possible for negative economic, political or legislative changes to surprise markets.
  • Create New...