Jump to content

Caseynotes

Community Member
  • Posts

    13,207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    556

Posts posted by Caseynotes

  1. 5 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

    oh ok, that's interesting, but never heard of any UK Dr proscribing it at all, just the opposite actually. Many report being refused and told it was banned.

    oh I see, the Dr must take full responsibility meaning they are not covered against any legal action that might occur unlike if it was govt approved.

    edit

    Also the 'non availability of other treatments' clause throughs them back into the vax treatments.

  2. 3 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    MISLEADING. Ivermectin is not "banned".

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-28-june-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-ivermectin-for-treatment-of-covid-19-foi-21-708

    There is also a clinical trial ongoing to prove its effectiveness.

    Ivermectin is currently not approved in the UK for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19, however clinicians may prescribe unlicensed medicines if, in their clinical judgement, there is no suitable licensed available alternative that is capable of meeting their individual patient needs. 

    oh ok, that's interesting, but never heard of any UK Dr proscribing it at all, just the opposite actually. Many report being refused and told it was banned.

  3. 3 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    Not a conspiracy. In highly vaccinated populations, where the MAJORITY are vaccinated, then yes when looking at raw numbers there will be more deaths in vaccinated people. It doesn't mean that vaccines are ineffective.

     

    https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/scicheck-why-its-easy-to-misinterpret-numbers-of-deaths-among-the-vaccinated/

    But again, those are raw numbers, among a highly vaccinated population. In its week 38 report, Public Health England — which has been replaced by the UK Health Security Agency — reported there were 3,158 deaths from COVID-19 from Aug. 23 through Sept. 19 and 2,284 of those individuals (72.3%) had received their second vaccine shot at least 14 days earlier. However, the same report shows vaccination rates approaching or exceeding 90% for age groups 60 and older, the group that accounts for 86.5% of all deaths in that time period.

    Overall, 77.3% of the U.K. population 12 and older had received two shots by Sept. 19.

     

    Where to start.

    The vid numbers are from the Pfizer study before the rollout.

    The ONS data is not looking at 'raw numbers' but RATE.

    Forget your corrupt factchecks, I already showed they are indirectly funded by Gates who is profiteering from the vaccines..

  4. Excellent and very important 30 minute video.

     

    Dr. Pierre Kory Presents the Evidence Base Supporting the Efficacy of Ivermectin for COVID-19

     
    November 2nd, 2021.
     
    Complete, up to date, review of Ivermectin, how it works, the evidence, the treatments, current official treatment protocols and the drug companies and their interference, misinformation and corruption.
     
    The UK govt still bans the use of ivermectin for the treatment of covid, they are complicit in the corruption and it is costing lives.
     
  5. 11 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    DEBUNKED. Not some grand conspiracy about the effectiveness of vaccines. In fact the picture you posted explicitly says "The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection."

    oh that's nice, more msm links but it is what it is, the change was made.

    So no comment on the video report on the Pfizer study then? No, just let all the big stuff slide by and pretend it doesn't exist.

  6. Ahh, someone has spotted the elephant in the room - what the data from the UK and Israel has shown clearly for several months now, that there are more deaths using the vaccines than not using them. 

     

    (and yes of course it gets the mandatory twitter warning as anything that dares to deviate from the official narrative does.)

     

    Next, we have covered this one before, but a timely reminder that the CDC had to change it's definition of a 'vaccine', after the rollout of these experimental vaxxes, removing the bit about how vaccines 'protect'.

     

    1c1.PNG.9f8425a9ca178492b965258797a10a7d.PNG

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. 1 hour ago, jlz said:

    Have they shut down your other post about the virus @Caseynotes?

    You have been insulting people for months and now they act on it. Interesting. You have been way ruder before, you and your minion, the clown.

    All the hard work that you have put into posting nonsense and memes from Twitter....They don't appreciate your purpose here.

    Finally there is some moderation on this forum and you get what you deserve.

    Frankieburgo is an unsung hero.

    haha, oh I see, so posting the latest data from PHE and the ONS is just ''posting nonsense'', well you just crack on with whatever it is you post meanwhile I'll continue to call out the sanctimonious clowns who pretend to hold the moral high ground and jump on the thread posting garbage but can't actually add anything to back up their delusions.

    • Sad 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Provaton said:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-9318-idUSL1N2P21CV

    "Posts are sharing numbers reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations and claiming that it proves the vaccines have killed people. This is false. Anyone can submit a report into the system and the reports do not imply causality."

     

    yes we've been here before haven't we.

    The same as a PCR test can't diagnose covid a VAERs report doesn't confirm death by vaccine but VAERS is a govt agency and they do check who has made the report and it's usually an attending Dr who probably wouldn't have bothered if they didn't have serious concerns.

    • Sad 1
  9. 2 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    As per my previous post, kids are vaccinated for diseases that have less occurance. It makes sense they are given the SAFE and EFFECTIVE vaccine that also helps reduce severity ,protects against long COVID and reduces the transmission period. 

    no, you don't know what you are talking about, to compare with other vaccines (that did actually complete their long term trials) was 'debunked' a very long time ago.

    No vaccine has ever worked against highly mutable diseases such as Influenza. They mutate far too quickly to achieve herd immunity and so the race is lost, just as has happened here. Boosters do not help as it's just more of the same.

    As with the yearly flu jab the vaccine makers end up forever trying to play catch up but are always at least 1 mutation behind.

    These vaccines are clearly not safe or effective.

    Latest US VAERS deaths data stands at over 17,000. 

    3e.PNG.85ac29e25b9b806b92c822ac7dddca2a.PNG

    • Sad 1
  10. Reminder, myocarditis and pericarditis leave permanent scaring in the heart tissue and in adults has a 50% mortality rate after 5 years. There is minimal data for children as it is normally so rare.

    No indication of cause in the news story below but across the world cases are rising.

    St John Fisher Catholic College: Two pupils dead at Staffordshire school | UK | News | Express.co.uk

     

    One weeks worth of data from Australia.

    1a.thumb.PNG.9e73c861fe7af194cc37c45bf6b62bc1.PNG

     

    1a1.thumb.PNG.8605e7d057b8cd44708153cd8b852f8f.PNG

    1a2.PNG.eee2aeb2ad0edd1e18032ce67c3be487.PNG

     

     

    • Sad 1
  11. Oh, Scottish Summer mortality up 14% this year  🤔🤔🤔🤔 What could possibly have caused that?

    Summer mortality Summer 2020 was +1.2% from 5yr average. This summer is 14.8% above, 3,178 higher deaths than would be expected. The trend is also worsening

    Scottish Unity - Edinburgh Group @scojw

    9b/ Here’s how that looks for the past 40 years. Each year has deviated from the norm, but typically +3 to -5%. This summer at 14.8% increase is a very unusual event.

     

    image.thumb.png.488bdd5be4a17ef7d598615c24e6003c.png

    • Sad 1
  12. 5 minutes ago, Provaton said:

    This is the real danger of this thread. Unsubstantiated nonsense which could have real consequences.

    You can't stand anybody questioning anything you write. You resort to insults and never address any points that anybody else makes on "your" thread.

    you guys are so funny, you delude yourselves that bit*hing is the same as disproving. None have disproved anything, just self delusion.

  13. 3 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    Over the last 18 months you've posted nothing but pics that you've copied/pasted from Facebook and Twitter, claiming them as fact without any kind of fact-checking yourself. These types have posts have been DEBUNKED by multiple sources/organisations.

    The fact you get so worked up and defensive when you are even half challenged by others just says it all really..

    No, I just can't stand sanctimonious gits who are self deluded into thinking they are the one and only arbiters of truth and no opinions other than their own can be tolerated.

    Not seen anyone debunk any study I've posted actually but keep dreaming.

     

  14. 4 minutes ago, Frankieburgo said:

    But don't you realise the impact you can have by trying to push this narrative of "the great reset" and your claims about vaccine ineffectiveness? 

    Go to Reddit and check out the Herman Cain award. 

    Misinformation like which is contained in your posts has a real impact on real people. Whether or not you look into your own links with a critical eye, the reality is that people read these types of posts without doing that, and take for face value these cheap claims. You could stop someone from getting the vaccine, or believing in the danger of COVID, and have real consequences.

     

     

    Look clod, over the last 18 months I've posted hundreds of scientific studies showing the official narrative is complete BS.

    People are smarter than you think and most are clearly smarter than you.

    ''Go to Reddit''  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣  what a joke.

    The govt and msm have been misleading the people from the start and most people don't get to see real science studies because they do not get any coverage.

    Of course I think that those who are not vulnerable in any way should not be locked down, should not social distance, should not wear a mask and should not get injected with experimental cloned spike proteins - when the chance of dying, if infected, for those who are not vulnerable, is less than one in a thousand (similar to common flu).

    Understand?

  15. 12 minutes ago, Provaton said:

    As soon as anybody argues against anything on Caseys thread the insults start coming....

    only to patronising Aholes.

    I don't care if you don't like science or other people having opinions, it's the pathetic attempt to pretend you are rebutting anything at all with lame msm bs. As I've said, why don't you just post what you heard on the telly last night, I'm sure everyone would really enjoy it.

    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...
us