Jump to content
  • 0

Client Sentiment: Web page showing wrong number

Question

Hi,

I have just been looking at two pages on the IG site and they show different client sentiment numbers for AUDUSD:

https://www.ig.com/uk/marketanalysis/ig-forex/audusd1 : 67% long

https://www.ig.com/uk/forex/markets-forex/aud-usd : 50% short

The API is also returning 50% short so I presume the 67% figure is incorrect?

Can somebody from Support check please?

Thanks

 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post

12 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You only just noticed that?

 

IG 'DGAF' as usual.  At least the DailyFX w@nkers get access to the correct info though :D 

Edited by dmedin

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

Remember the data is indicative, if they give you incorrect info and you lose money because of it they don't give a f*k :D 

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0

- Hi honey, do you love me? 

- Of course I do

- I don't think so, you seem distant lately

- Well, love is just a sentiment

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
24 minutes ago, jlz said:

- Hi honey, do you love me? 

- Of course I do

- I don't think so, you seem distant lately

- Well, love is just a sentiment

 

It's not a problem for you, so no need to care :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
Just now, jlz said:

I actually use sentiment from one of the algos.

https://labs.ig.com/rest-trading-api-reference/service-detail?id=551

So, it is a problem for me. Bigger than it seems and unfortunately as you said, because it is indicative it shouldn't be used to make any decision. 

It's a problem for me also. IG just need to ensure the numbers are consistent, I don't know which number to believe as the API shows a different number to some of their webpages.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
4 minutes ago, jlz said:

So, it is a problem for me. Bigger than it seems and unfortunately as you said, because it is indicative it shouldn't be used to make any decision. 

 

Yeah just because a broker slaps the word 'indicative' on their data gives them a free pass to screw over their retail clients.

That's exactly how it works.

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
15 minutes ago, andysinclair said:

It's a problem for me also. IG just need to ensure the numbers are consistent, I don't know which number to believe as the API shows a different number to some of their webpages.

yes, the API shows different numbers. Until one of the sides reaches 80% I don't normally do anything, below that it can change quickly. You can blame the broker but you can't prove it. If we compare it with other sites, is IG's data wrong or the other site's data wrong? How can you actually prove it?

We are on moving sands. 

Edited by jlz
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
1 hour ago, jlz said:

yes, the API shows different numbers. Until one of the sides reaches 80% I don't normally do anything, below that it can change quickly. You can blame the broker but you can't prove it. If we compare it with other sites, is IG's data wrong or the other site's data wrong? How can you actually prove it?

We are on moving sands. 

 

Wtf are you talking about?

You *are* aware that DailyFX is a subsidiary of IG and gets it data from them?

Share this post


Link to post
  • 0
1 hour ago, jlz said:

We are on moving sands. 

Yeah, you work in IT all right.

Slimy office worker c&nt language.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Topics
      13,162
    • Total Posts
      66,786
    • Total Members
      89,596
    Newest Member
    Majawis1402
    Joined 01/12/20 14:39
  • Posts

    • There was another fork the other day - Bitcoin Latinum - the world's largest "insured" digital asset. One wonders if every time another variant is created it simply draws away potential investors from the original version. I bet committed Bitcoiners wish these variants would all just fork off 😉 I saw something the other day that happened to mention that a Bitcoin was worth about 10 ounces of Gold.......then it hit me - would I prefer to be offered one Bitcoin out there in the ether or ten ounces of physical Gold in my actual possession? 10 Bitcoin to buy a single ounce of Gold intuitively feels like the more sensible way around as I'm certain that Gold is safe but several times less certain that Bitcoin is - so we could be out by a factor of 100! But whilst fund managers all start allocating the odd fractional percent to get exposure to Alpha for minimal portfolio downside the price will probably hold or bubble up even more. It will be interesting though  if national regulators later turn round and ban funds from holding cryptos - then they will all have to rush for the exit at the same time. Maybe that's the ultimate expected outcome.  According to Wikipedia in March 2018 0.5% of bitcoin wallets owned 87% of all bitcoins ever mined. Imagine if  transferring that 87% to fund managers at peak prices is the intended end-game before it all collapses? It would make Bernie Madoff look like a mere pick-pocket.  
    • 3 Weeks to Flatten the Curve  -- Day 252 and counting:   A Dr writes, Yardley Yeadon @MichaelYeadon3 (PhD respiratory pharmacol) 1h "... The hallmark of a pandemic is excess deaths, such as the extreme event in spring. In the autumn, in excess of 10k deaths have been attributed to covid19. Yet the autumn all-causes mortality is barely above the 95% confidence interval for the 5y average. That’s not even an epidemic. For comparison, the degree of elevation of the last weeks all-cause mortality is the same as that arising from the first real heatwave we’ve had in U.K. (several days in Aug where temps exceeded 34C). Those were circulatory excess deaths & are familiar in Europe. Oddly though, now, non-covid19 deaths are apparently reduced. As this is most unlikely, there is significant overstatement of covid19 deaths, in turn due to the volume of false positives from PCR mass testing. Corrected for this, the dominant cause of total mortality is likely due to restricted access to the NHS for 8mo & counting. ..."  
×
×