Jump to content

Indices


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, dmedin said:

The problem with the MA crossovers is that you don't really just want to get out of the trade if you reach a limit, you want to let it run until price closes beneath the 20 SMA.

 

I am looking at 5 books written by traders. One thing they have in common is that they mention specific setups or strategies and different market conditions ( range, retracement, breakout, trend, reversal). I tend not to trade crossovers or breakouts (although I do pay attention to them) but rather retracements and so I always have provisional stops and limits in mind.

  • Thought provoking 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, AndrewS said:

I am looking at 5 books written by traders. One thing they have in common is that they mention specific setups or strategies and different market conditions ( range, retracement, breakout, trend, reversal). I tend not to trade crossovers or breakouts (although I do pay attention to them) but rather retracements and so I always have provisional stops and limits in mind.

Isn't that an overload of information?  I feel overloaded.  If it's plausible and possible to make money from a relatively simple mechanical system, why would people invest so much time and effort into Elliot Waves and all the rest?  It truly boggles the mind.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, dmedin said:

Isn't that an overload of information?  I feel overloaded. 

How profitable any approach is varies considerably under different market conditions (reversal, trend, range ext) so it pays to assess what the conditions are and whether they are changing.

 

Link to comment
14 hours ago, dmedin said:

 

The problem with the MA crossovers is that you don't really just want to get out of the trade if you reach a limit, you want to let it run until price closes beneath the 20 SMA.

 

Five closes on a limit in a range in a row.

US30M15.jpg.cc2868b37f4948f74bca6b975acd8d02.jpg.7dbf5d55dee468c64ba5dca244ef3013.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, dmedin said:

 

The orange line doesn't seem to be quite so useful as the green one.

The 20 period MA  (red line)  was more useful on Wednesday and Thursday.

The higher the velocity of a swing the more useful the shorter MAs tend to be for a retracement trade.

US30M15.thumb.jpg.bc1438923e65aea48642385f5348de63.jpg

 

 

Link to comment

I am blocked by IG “the Market Maker” to come here to comment. I have not used IG so far as my main trading account for good reasons. It is no loss to them to ban me since I won’t let them make a dime from me.

This is my last comment to say goodbye to a couple of guys. Might see you in other forums. Let me remind those wanting to trade against my prediction. Be careful.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, dmedin said:

Back on track :)

 

how is your stats recording going. I'll do a piece on trading simulators for the trade planning and testing thread, sims make testing quick and easy though would still like a user review of the Trading Rush free app.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, dmedin said:

Haven't done it 100 times yet :D  

the Trading Rush videos uses 100 times but they are using a simulator so you are using past data, you fast forward to find your setup, trigger the trade and then fast forward to see the result.

You can do the same thing eyeball backtesting which, as per the 'trade planning and testing' thread do 20 times, then move to forward testing on demo and test 20 times, then onto live at min size 20 times but most won't survive the quick eyeball backtest anyway.

  • Great! 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • image.png

  • Posts

    • This analysis provides insights into the Elliott Wave patterns observed in major NASDAQ stocks, including the NASDAQ 100, S&P 500, and key companies like Apple (AAPL), Tesla (TSLA), Amazon (AMZN), Nvidia (NVDA), Microsoft (MSFT), Meta Platforms (META), Netflix (NFLX), and Alphabet (GOOGL). Currently, we assess that the Wave (4) low may have been established across these indices, signaling a potential shift to a "Risk On" stance. This scenario suggests that building long positions in most technology stocks could be increasingly viable. However, the inherent risk lies in the possibility that Wave (4) may not yet be fully in place. As a precaution, we continue to manage existing risks carefully. Should the market conditions confirm the placement of Wave (4), we will be better positioned to safely escalate our long trading positions in anticipation of the next upward movement. Video Chapters 00:00 NASDAQ 100 (NDX)  SP500 (SPX) 01:43 Apple (AAPL) 03:26 Amazon (AMZN) 04:18 NVIDIA (NVDA) 05:13 Meta Platforms (META) 05:54 Netflix (NFLX)  06:31 Alphabet (GOOGL) 07:20 Microsoft MSFT 08:00 Tesla (TSLA) 09:20 End Analyst Peter Mathers TradingLounge™ Australian Financial Services Licence - AFSL 317817 Source: tradinglounge com       
    • Would love to grab the gem at a little lower...
×
×
  • Create New...
us