The Virus and the Economy

[Caseynotes]

Follow the Money.

''Omicron variant 'made €9bn in week for top Pfizer and Moderna shareholders' 'lucy johnston  @thelucyjohnston

Omicron variant 'made €9bn in week for top Pfizer and Moderna shareholders' (breakingnews.ie)

 

'Notice the wording. Getting a booster will make your life ‘easier’. Not ‘safer’. Not ‘will make you more protected’. But ‘will make your life easier in all sorts of ways’.    @godblesstoby

'Prime Minister “Getting three jabs, getting your booster will become an important fact…. We will have to adjust our concept of what constitutes a full vaccination”. This will take 35 million people with two doses of a vaccine back to unvaccinated if happens.'

A jab every 3 months supposing the vaccines actually work on the variants (which it clearly doesn't).

 

 

 

 

[skyreach]

The Evidence countering covid variants prescriptions?

As members have posted above:

"(mRNA) is brand new technology and there were bound to have been some mistakes." 

"Israelis' have had enough of this nonsense, booster uptake levelling off at 46% as govt talks about a 4th shot".

"Follow the Money.

''Omicron variant 'made €9bn in week for top Pfizer and Moderna shareholders' 'lucy johnston  @thelucyjohnston".

WHAT IS GOING? IT PAINTS A BAD PICTURE OF VESTED INTERESTS MAKING A HUGE PUSH AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF GETTING MONEY OUT OUT GOVERNMENTS THROUGH FEAR AND HELL IS ABOUT BREAK OUT MANTRA!!!

AND ODDER STILL IS HOW NO ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE IS EVER CONSIDERED THAT DOES & USE TO WORK IN PAST AGES WHEN IT WAS USED WITH WORKABILITY. IT COULD HAVE BEEN STATED AND USED IN ADDITION TO THE DRUG BASED PRESCRIPTIONS.

SOMEONE TOLD ME THAT THERE IS A LAW TO THE EFFECT THAT YOU CANNOT SAY YOU CAN CURE ANYTHING IN THE USA. IT WAS PASSED LONG AGO TO STOP ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES AND HERBAL PRACTICES FROM USING THAT STATEMENT.  HOWEVER IF THAT IS TRUE THEN IT ALSO MEANS THAT ANY DRUG BASED MEDICINE CANNOT CURE BUT ONLY RECEDE ANY CONDITION (but only apparently). IF THE ALTERNATIVES DID THAT THEN MANY GOT BIG FINES OR WERE CLOSED DOWN ON SOME PRETEXT AFTER THE IRS COMING DOWN ON THEM.    DOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ON THIS?

GREED KNOWS NO BOUND.

ALL COMPANIES HAVE THEIR VESTED INTEREST. OFCOURSE THAT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN IT USED NEGATIVELY BY ALL COMPANIES, BUT SOME WILL.

 

[Caseynotes]

The hysterical propaganda to deliberately divide people and divert attention from the failing vaccines continues from main stream media, the figure is more like 35% and they know it (see Sunday's post).

 

 

"As wealthy countries react to Omicron with travel bans & booster shots, the WHO scolded them, calling the steps ineffective & unfair...WHO officials said there was not yet evidence that boosters prevented illness & hosp. in people inf. with variants"

W.H.O. Scolds Rich Nations for Travel Bans and Booster Shots - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

1nPr0p0rt10n2 @1Pr0p0rt10n2  23h

Given the pressure to get vaccinated or boosted, you might think that the countries that jabbed more would have lower c19 death rates. But on the whole, the opposite is true. (The big green dot is China, the big pink one is India, UK is blue at 215/68%)

 

Meanwhile,

'Scotland: Cardiac data. Below, the latest trend of cardiac attendances by Scottish Ambulance Service - this is *excess* above the 2018/19 norm. Huge spike in summer, 500 ambulance calls per week above normal, mainly age 15-64. Was settling, then spike up again since late October.'

 

[MongiIG]

Preliminary data about the severity of the omicron Covid variant is “a bit encouraging,” the White House’s Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said on Sunday, following early figures from South Africa that suggest it may not be as bad as initially feared.

Full article: CNBC

[skyreach]

WHO - NOT FIT FOR THE JOB?

COVID VARIANTS ARE LIKE THE FLU. EACH YEAR A NEW STRAIN WILL EMERGE .

WHO is quick to jump to hype  when in fact they should monitor and keep under control the new type that was in Africa. Have protocols placed more effectively. HANDLE IT SOURCE.

THE WHO SUPPRESSED MUCH INFO AS PER MKC86;S QUOTE:

"As before, so now, so in the future. A blast from the past!

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/jun/04/swine-flu-experts-big-pharmaceutical "

THE WHO FAILED TO HANDLE CHINA ORIGINALLY TOO, AND ITS CEO WAS PHRASING THE CHINESE LEADER INSTEAD OF GETTING FULL ACCESS OF THE ORIGIN OF COVID THERE AT THE BEGINNING, NOT MUCH LATER IN TIME WHEN THE EVIDENCE IS DESTROYED. NOT AN EFFECTIVE LEADER OF WHO.

BESIDES NO COUNTRY OR THR WHO EVER FINED OR MADE CHINA RESPONSIBLE AND PAY THE WORLD TOWARDS THIS DISASTER.

I DARE SAY MORE WILL COME OUT IN THE FUTURE, BUT THAT WILL BE TOO LATE FOR COUNTRIES THAT STOCK PILED AND NO ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS.

OH, GOVERNMENTS (POLITICIANS & KEY CIVIL SERVANTS) ARE TO BLAME FOR NOT RESEARCHING ALTERNATIVES., E.G.,

https://www.decon7.com/

And traditional head / nose / chest steam taking.

 

[skyreach]

WOW!!! THAT INTERVIEW BY RFK IS A REVELATION OF THE TRUTH.

 

 

[MongiIG]

The World Health Organization on Monday issued a strong recommendation against administering convalescent plasma to treat Covid-19 patients, citing research that shows no improvement in patients who received the treatment.

Full article: CNBC

[Caseynotes]

dear oh dear, where to start?

- the disinformation being peddled by the establishment to blame the unvaxxed for a seasonal rise in cases and order more vax mandates?

- the continued misuse of the PCR test to inflate the numbers?

- Let's start with the negative efficacy of the vaccines, are they causing deaths rather than stopping them? (yes).

 

Latest data from Israel and deaths increased hot on the heels of the booster rollout, just the same as after the initial vax rollout.

 

Ruminator Dan (Telegram: RuminatorDan) @RuminatorDan

''ISRAEL, Covid cases, deaths & vaccinations, 20 Feb 2020 to 19 Oct 2021. [owid data; unprocessed, apart from normalising.] grey = daily new cases; red = daily new deaths; blue = daily new V's; dotted = cumulative V's; totals in key.'

 

Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath

''This is going to sound utterly contradictory but it is true. Covid infections increase for a period before they start to fall. This is well established. SAGE and PHE have discussed the phenomenon.''

'SAGE commented on the phenomenon in March 2021 but have ignored it since:'

“The observation that a significant number of people developing [sic] symptoms within a few days of a first dose may suggest some behaviour change following vaccination (and before immunity has developed). It is important therefore that communications around vaccination reinforce the need for safe behaviours to be maintained. It may also be the case that some infections occur during the end-to-end process of vaccination (i.e. including journeys to and from vaccination).

It gets worse before it gets better – HART (hartgroup.org)

 

Then there are the people dying immediately after getting the vax but because of the < 14 day rule (now < than 28 days) they are listed as unvaxxed and therefore are unvaxxed deaths. The problem is it's not just a few 🤔

'In this interview Norman Fenton explains the results of a new report that analyses the latest ONS data on mortality of vaccinated v unvaccinated.'

Norman Fenton interviewed by Majid Nawaz, LBC Radio 4 Dec 2021 - YouTube

 

 

 

 

 

[skyreach]

MANKIND;S DISEASE?

WHAT IS IT THAT MAKES TOP OFFICIALS IN RESPONSIBLE POSITIONS NOT SEE THE TRUE FACTS OR HAPPENINGS THAT TAKE PLACE BUT ARE ADVERSE IN EFFECT?

IS IT JUST A VESTED INTEREST COMING IN THE WAY SO THEY FUDGE THE KEY DEFINITIONS AND ANY THEORIES OR ANY RESULTS OF SOME FINDINGS  TO FUDGE IN TURN THE FINAL RESULTS OR CONCLUSIONS?

OR, IS IT THAT THEY ARE VERY POOR OBSERVERS OF THE PHENOMENA TAKING PLACE IN THE FIRST PLACE?

OR, THEY LIKE TO PUT A SPIN IN THE WHOLE AFFAIR TO MAKE THEM SELF LOOK GOOD TO OTHERS FOR THEIR OWN PR VALUE AND TO CLIMB UP THE POSITION LEVELS OR RICHNESS LEVELS?

WHATEVER THE COMBINATIONS OF ABOVE, THEY ALL SEEM TO PLAY A PART. IT DOES NO GOOD TO THEM IN THE END, AS WELL AS THE REST OF US AT ALL TIMES.

IT IS LIKE, IN EFFECT, A SINKING "SHIP£ THAT WE ARE ALL IN, CAUSED BY RECKLESS BEHAVIOUR AT THE TOP AND MISJUDGEMENTS AND THE "SHIP" AND ALL ON BOARD WILL SINK, WITH NO ONE THERE TO COME TO RESCUE US AT ALL.

ARE SOME PEOPLE AT THE TOP THAT DESTRUCTIVE FOR THE GREATER GOOD OF MANAGING THE RUNNING OF THE "SHIP"?

[Caseynotes]

MSM keeping the same fake narrative running day after day after day.

(see Sun and Mon posts on this topic)  

It is a deliberate campaign of dishonesty.    

MSM think people are stupid and so truth is not necessary.

 

 

 

The absolute risk reduction (ARR) in transmission between the vaxxed and unvaxxed is negligible and has been since the start (see previous posts on Pfizer trials).

And totally ignoring immunity against reinfection after recovery is dishonest.

 

...  for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%).''

The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing - The Lancet Regional Health – Europe

 

Oh, so actually it's the vaxxed filling covid hospital beds then 🤨

 

Yet a member of the board of trustees for the WEF (Ursula von der Leyen) has call for EU countries to consider mandates and lockdowns for the unvaxxed. 🤔

 

Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath  43m

'Inexorable rise of covid deaths. Show me where vaccines reduced this trajectory? Asia started playing catch up with vaccines in spring.'

 

[MongiIG]

GlaxoSmithKline Plc said research shows its Covid-19 antibody treatment is effective against the full combination of mutations in the new omicron variant.

Tests done in-vitro against a pseudo-virus that recreates a synthesized version of omicron showed that sotrovimab, Glaxo’s antibody treatment, stands up to all mutations in the spike protein of the omicron variant and not just the key mutations, the drugmaker said in a statement Tuesday. The tests included all 37 mutations identified to-date in the spike protein. 

Full article: Bloomberg

[MongiIG]

[Provaton]

24 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

'Inexorable rise of covid deaths. Show me where vaccines reduced this trajectory? Asia started playing catch up with vaccines in spring.'

er, it's a cumulative chart which can only go up....and each line includes a wide range of countries with various vaccination rates, restrictions, infection rates etc.

How about these 2 charts (UK vaccination program started December 2020), or do they not fit your narrative?

 

[Caseynotes]

48 minutes ago, Provaton said:

ow about these 2 charts (UK vaccination program started December 2020), or do they not fit your narrative?

Yeah it does actually, see the start of the vax programme (arrow).

I did point this out at the time and also noted a twitter account that tracked the vax rollout coinciding with an increase in deaths that got up to 35 countries before twitter suspended the account.

Edited December 7, 2021 by Caseynotes

[Provaton]

4 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Yeah it does actually, see the start of the vax programme (arrow).

I did point this out at the time and also noted a twitter account that tracked the vax rollout coinciding with an increase in deaths that got up to 35 countries before twitter suspended the account.

How do you explain the drop in deaths as the vaccination program accelerated?

Deaths did increase as the vaccination program started, then once many of the most vunerable were vaccinated the death numbers started dropping:

[Caseynotes]

The PCR Test and why all the cases, hospitalisation, and deaths numbers are fake.

- does not test for covid and cannot be used to diagnose covid. 

- it is actually designed to detect the SARS-CoV2 virus but,

- if it is run at 27 cycle thresholds it could detect live SAR-CoV2 virus but,

- run at 40 cycles, as it is in western countries, it cannot detect any live virus at all.

- the PCR, as used, can only detect old, dead viral fragments.

 

* Therefore a positive PCR test only confirms the person has a properly functioning immune system and has immunity to the SARS-CoV2 virus, and therefore immunity to covid.

 

Because of this, the test in it's current form, using it to diagnose covid gives a huge false positive ratio.

Studies range from 61% to a massive 93%. I posted recently the Fenton study showing a false positive rate of 85%.

The larger ratios come from testing at schools and testing stations, the reason they have such a high rate of false positives is because they are testing mostly asymptomatics, you are not allowed in if you actually have any symptoms.

Symptoms define a disease, no symptoms = no disease. Nearly all positives of asymptomatics are false positives.

This is why, earlier this year, the WHO recommended a change in PCR testing, the new recommendation stated that a positive PCR should be confirmed by a lateral flow test and consideration of the person's case  history (do they have symptoms?).

Needless to say the govt of every country ignored the WHO's recommendation and carried on producing the fake covid cases, hosptalisations, and deaths numbers.

You really need to ask yourself why would they do that.

 

 

 

 

 

[Caseynotes]

19 minutes ago, Provaton said:

How do you explain the drop in deaths as the vaccination program accelerated?

Because covid is very similar to the flu and comes in waves just like the flu, and also has a very similar infection fatality rate as the flu ...

oh wait, where's the flu gone? Has anyone seen it?

 

 

[MongiIG]

LONDON — Covid-19 vaccine mandates continue to be a divisive topic of debate, and the subject remains as salient as ever while the world grapples not only with the delta variant but concerns over the spread of omicron, a mutation of the virus whose risk profile remains largely unknown.

As some countries struggle to encourage a voluntary take-up of vaccines — which are proven to greatly reduce the risk of severe infection, hospitalization and death from the virus — some governments are considering, or have already stated, that they will introduce compulsory vaccinations.

Only way to stop the virus?

The idea of compulsory vaccinations has been contentious in Europe for a long time, and levels of vaccine skepticism differ wildly from country to country. But the current Covid landscape has made the debate an increasingly prevalent one, and some officials believe mandating vaccines is the only way to stop the virus.

Full article: CNBC

[Provaton]

2 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

Because covid is very similar to the flu and comes in waves just like the flu, and also has a very similar infection fatality rate as the flu ...

Eh? So deaths dropped as cases rose because "Covid comes in waves"? You're not making much sense here @Caseynotes

It's clear that vaccinations have led to a much lower case/death rate. The charts show this quite clearly.

And in response to your "the hospitals are full of vaccinated people", maybe this will help:

[skyreach]

2 hours ago, Caseynotes said:

The PCR Test and why all the cases, hospitalisation, and deaths numbers are fake.

- does not test for covid and cannot be used to diagnose covid. 

- it is actually designed to detect the SARS-CoV2 virus but,

- if it is run at 27 cycle thresholds it could detect live SAR-CoV2 virus but,

- run at 40 cycles, as it is in western countries, it cannot detect any live virus at all.

- the PCR, as used, can only detect old, dead viral fragments.

 

* Therefore a positive PCR test only confirms the person has a properly functioning immune system and has immunity to the SARS-CoV2 virus, and therefore immunity to covid.

 

Because of this, the test in it's current form, using it to diagnose covid gives a huge false positive ratio.

Studies range from 61% to a massive 93%. I posted recently the Fenton study showing a false positive rate of 85%.

The larger ratios come from testing at schools and testing stations, the reason they have such a high rate of false positives is because they are testing mostly asymptomatics, you are not allowed in if you actually have any symptoms.

Symptoms define a disease, no symptoms = no disease. Nearly all positives of asymptomatics are false positives.

This is why, earlier this year, the WHO recommended a change in PCR testing, the new recommendation stated that a positive PCR should be confirmed by a lateral flow test and consideration of the person's case  history (do they have symptoms?).

Needless to say the govt of every country ignored the WHO's recommendation and carried on producing the fake covid cases, hosptalisations, and deaths numbers.

You really need to ask yourself why would they do that.

The W.H.O and governments have gotten themselves into a fix. The dilemma is 

can people have rights to decide to have inoculations or not.?

Health professionals rightly want all to be safe.

But vaccines are a contentious issue as their workability is limited and includes major side effects that are not clearly worked out and often have false reporting and sometimes from dubious studies conclusion. The hype and fear is inlaid to drive the sales and commit governments to act. So by the time the false conclusions or incorrect results are found out the Pharmas have made billions and locked in legal protections. SMART.

WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE -- SOMETHING MORE BASIC AND EFFECTIVE, IN ADDITION TO ANY VAXs IS enforce wearing of masks. Educate the public about keeping safe and immune enhancing foods and vitamins that will help and strengthen the safety bubble.

IN ADDITION WHY HAS THE TOP CIVIL SERVICE OF GOVERNMENT NOT RECOMMENDED https://www.decon7.com/ ?

This site shows the solution to NOT CLOSING ANY BUSINESS AND USING THE PRODUCT TO KILL ALL BACTERIA, GERMS AND VIRUSES TO 99.9999%.

WE CAN KEEP THE SOCIETY SAFE AND KEEP BUSINESS OPERATING.

WEIRD BUSINESSES HAVE NOT REALISED THIS!!!!! I LEFT OUT GOVERNMNTS, BUT THAT IS BECAUSE I DO NOT SEE THEM SOLVING ANY PROBLEMS THEY ARE CONFRONTED WITH -- I MEAN WITHOUT IT BEING A COMPLEX SOLUTION OR COSTS RUNNING INTO THE EXTREME LEVELS WHEN SIMPLER ALTERNATIVES ALWAYS ESCAPES THEM.

 

 

[MongiIG]

Study suggests Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine may only partially protect against Omicron.

By Michael Erman, 8th December 2021. Full article: investing.com

(Reuters) -The Omicron variant of the coronavirus can partially evade the protection from two doses of Pfizer Inc (NYSE:PFE) and partner BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine, the research head of a laboratory at the Africa Health Research Institute in South Africa said on Tuesday.

Still, the study showed that blood from people who had received two doses of the vaccine and had a prior infection were mostly able to neutralize the variant, suggesting that booster doses of the vaccine could help to fend off infection.

[MongiIG]

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on Tuesday said the omicron variant of the virus that causes Covid-19 appears to be milder than previous strains, but also seems to spread faster and could lead to more mutations in the future.

“I don’t think it’s good news to have something that spreads fast,” Bourla told The Wall Street Journal during an interview at the paper’s CEO Council Summit. “Spreads fast means it will be in billions of people and another mutation may come. You don’t want that.”

White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said reports over the weekend from South Africa suggest omicron is not as severe as initially feared, while noting that more data is needed to fully assess the risk posed by the variant.

The South African Medical Research Council, in a report released Saturday, said most patients admitted to a hospital in Pretoria who had Covid didn’t need supplemental oxygen. The report also noted that many patients were admitted for other medical reasons and were then found to have Covid.

Full article: CNBC

[Provaton]

Unfortunately it doesn't look like Omicron is mild: Severe Omicron cases in Gauteng (South Africa) hospitals are accelerating, increasing by over 25% in the last 24 hours.

Patients in ICU:
139 Dec 6
177 Dec 7 (+27%)

Patients currently ventilated:
41 Dec 6
51 Dec 7 (+25%)

https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/

[Caseynotes]

16 hours ago, Provaton said:

Eh? So deaths dropped as cases rose because "Covid comes in waves"? You're not making much sense here @Caseynotes

yes, just like the flu covid comes in seasonal waves which does actually make a lot of sense.

Also, Pfizer's own data showed an absolute risk reduction of vaccine over placebo in the 40,000 cohort study was just 1% (15 vs 14 deaths).

I used to use the FT's data and charts very early on in 2020 till finding out they were not honest and stopped. Do you know how much money they get from the Gates Foundation?

[Caseynotes]

Covid is still a disease of the elderly.

 

Russel Brand on Pfizer.

 

NZ's fascist PM declares the vaxx programme will never end and she's right, every successive shot depletes your natural antibody count and before long you will need continuous jabs to avoid death from the common cold.

 

 

 

 

And people are waking up to the fact that 5 dominate strains in just 20 months is not normal, think flu, 1 every couple of years.

Vaccine pressure speeding up the viral evolutionary cycle. The antibodies produced by the vaccines cannot see the virus at all any longer. Solution more of the same? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The only solution for highly mutable viruses is herd natural immunity while protecting the vulnerable, always was.

 

Bret Weinstein  @BretWeinstein12h

Every expert who told us escape variants were a problem caused by extra Covid cases in the unvaccinated (rather than selection on breakthrough cases in the vaccinated) was spreading misinformation. The question is: why did they do that given the logic was clear from the get go?

Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD

 

"By tracking the evolutionary trajectories of vax-resistant mutations in more than 2.2 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes, we reveal that the occurrence & frequency of vax-resistant mutations correlate strongly with the vaccination rates in Europe and America."

 

Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Revealing Vaccine-Resistant Mutations in Europe and America - PubMed (nih.gov)

.

[Provaton]

11 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

yes, just like the flu covid comes in seasonal waves which does actually make a lot of sense.

I was showing cases going up (a wave) but deaths not going up i.e. the vaccines are working as intended!

13 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

Also, Pfizer's own data showed an absolute risk reduction of vaccine over placebo in the 40,000 cohort study was just 1% (15 vs 14 deaths)

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-964291665925

Posts misrepresent Pfizer data on vaccine efficacy

Quote

Pfizer released updated data from its vaccine study showing that as of mid-March, the shots were 97% effective in preventing severe disease from COVID-19 up to six months later. The data also showed the shots’ efficacy against COVID-19 symptoms dropped slightly with time: it peaked at 96% efficacy 2 months after the shots were administered and fell to 84% after 6 months.

Quote

Pfizer’s study states that fourteen people in the placebo group and 15 people in the vaccinated group died before January 2021. The vast majority of the deaths were unrelated to COVID-19. Only two people in the placebo group died of COVID-19 and one person in the vaccinated group died of COVID-19 pneumonia, according to additional Pfizer data obtained by The Associated Press. The rest of the deaths were due to other factors, including heart disease and heart attacks.

The report states that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine.

 

[Caseynotes]

3 minutes ago, Provaton said:

The vast majority of the deaths were unrelated to COVID-19.

It's simple maths so I wouldn't bother with your fact checkers.

95% relative risk reduction but actually only1% absolute risk reduction.

Out of 40,000 people the vaxxed group only had 1 less covid death, hardly statistically significant.

Still to come, the latest FOI data release on the ongoing Pfizer trial is showing the vaxxed group have  5 x more deaths from heart conditions than the unvaxxed 🤨🤨

Helps explain how come vaxx efficacy has gone negative for most age groups.

[Provaton]

25 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

It's simple maths so I wouldn't bother with your fact checkers

nah, let's not bother with the facts, theories from "experts" on Twitter are much more interesting.

I'm close to giving up on this thread, I can't keep up with the cr*p posted here, I just hope not many people are reading it and getting led down the conspiracy path....

[Caseynotes]

18 minutes ago, Provaton said:

nah, let's not bother with the facts, theories from "experts" on Twitter are much more interesting.

I'm close to giving up on this thread, I can't keep up with the cr*p posted here, I just hope not many people are reading it and getting led down the conspiracy path....

you what? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 you're only ever trolled the thread anyway.

What 'experts' (you are misusing quote marks again). 

The 1% absolute risk reduction is from Pfiser's own data and comes from the Lancet ffs, common knowledge except to those who get their 'facts' from msm.

 

Meanwhile GMB having been pumping the public for 20 months, had a poll on mandates and were so shocked that their ceaseless propaganda was not working they immediately deleted the poll result.

😄😄😄😄😄

 

 

Edited December 8, 2021 by Caseynotes

[Provaton]

14 minutes ago, Caseynotes said:

you what? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 you're only ever trolled the thread anyway.

What 'experts' (you are misusing quote marks again). 

The 1% absolute risk reduction is from Pfiser's own data and comes from the Lancet ffs, common knowledge except to those who get their 'facts' from msm.

More misinformation: The ARR will always appear low as it depends on the event rate.

“Let’s say a study enrolled 20,000 patients into the control group and 20,000 in the vaccine group. In that study, 200 people in the control group got sick and 0 people in the vaccine group got sick. Even though the vaccine efficacy would be a whopping 100%, the ARR would show that vaccines reduce the absolute risk by just 1% (200/20,000= 1%). For the ARR to increase to 20% in our example study with a vaccine with 100% efficacy, 4,000 of the 20,000 people in the control group would have to get sick (4,000/20,000= 20%).”

Please step back for a moment and think about what you are posting here and how if your "research" persuades just one person to not get the vaccine and they die, how would you feel then?

It might seem clever and amusing to you but it's not without consequences.